Tygew

Antichrist

Please do not readd this edit to the Antichrist article. It is against Wikipedia's point-of-view guidelines, and deviates from the manual of style. If you'd like, I can help you make it more encyclopedic by pointing out what could be changed. Cheers, Master of Puppets ^{Care to share?} 05:54, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

your userpage

Could you please remove it? WP userpage guidelines allow limited personal information, but not personal essays, and this one is reading a bit preachy to be honest. Ironholds 08:23, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Tyge

A tag has been placed on Tyge requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Icewedge (talk) 18:13, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Antichrist

Your changes to the article have been reverted (by another editor). You need to carefully read our policy on no original research, which says that editors may not argue from their own personal knowledge. If you want to argue that something should be written differently in the article, you must provide a reliable source, such as a journal article, that makes the argument for that change (that is, has different wording). You are not an authority, I am not an authority, and no one else editing Wikipedia is an authority, as far as our rules are concerned.

If following this rule is a problem for you, please consider contributing at other places on the Web rather than Wikipedia. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 01:36, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Antichrist, you will be blocked from editing. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 15:36, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 20:35, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Please do not use talk pages for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 09:22, 24 April 2009 (UTC)