Hexamethyl tungsten

edit

Hi Tyler,

I've updated the images at WMe6 as you suggested on my talk page.

Cheers

Ben 18:12, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Excellent, thanks Ben!

Tyler Matthews 21:31, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Need help on linking to references

edit

I have created an article, Hexamethyl tungsten, and have suggested to readers that if they would like further information to consult a particular reference in the references section. Right now, I just indicate the reference number manually (see the Molecular Geometry section of Hexamethyl tungsten). Obviously this will cause problems if I go ahead and insert additional references before the one I'm commenting on, as the reference number will shift. In addition, I like to make multiple references to the same source, and am currently doing so with the 1 syntax. This too will break whenever new references are inserted. Is there a mechanism for linking to references in some manner other than using a number, say some internal comment or name that is unique? Is there are current standard way this is typically handled? How does one reference the same source multiple times without using the "ref" tag, resulting in duplicates? Tyler Matthews 04:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

I think your looking for this reference to Footnotes.
<ref name="multiple"/>
will be the tag you should use everywhere you use the number 1. The name inside the quotes will link all references to the same footnote. Vice-versa, using a different word would allow several references to a separate footnote. exit2dos2000 04:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Diana Hopper for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diana Hopper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Hopper until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:54, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Electric Hydrogen (December 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 22:59, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Tyler Matthews! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 22:59, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Electric Hydrogen

edit
 

Hello, Tyler Matthews. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Electric Hydrogen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 23:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply