N Júnior
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Far Cry - Shooting.gif
edit
A tag has been placed on File:Far Cry - Shooting.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:26, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
1983
editHi there, I don't understand why you thought it necessary to twice mention the movie 1983 in these edits, so I have removed the content. It seems gratuitous to mention the other project as if we're trying to inflate Shine via association to another project. The claim of "success" was also not sufficiently supported and just came off as puffery. There were other changes I had to make, like removing the detail about how long it took to write and produce. I don't see how that's relevant in the lead. I've also had to clean up some of the syntax and grammar. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:53, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry. I don't know the style of how to write an article on wiki. Most part of the article was copied from Maheshinte Prathikaaram, simultaneously my English is also not good. U+20B3 (talk) 17:09, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 20
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Inspector Dawood Ibrahim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asif Ali. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
N Júnior (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't know why you blocked me. I didn't done any vandalism. I seen Inside the Valley stating that i used graphic signature. It was a copy of User:Vensatry's signature (If you don't think check his signature), when i seen it i also feel to make one like that. I changed its colour through HTML colour codes because i know it before i came here. I am working as a photographic artist. He also said i have comparison with those blocked users. One blocked user have 18 edits on Action Hero Biju and i have 32. If wiki is like this you have to block all user who have a similar compare to every article. He said i replaced a poster of some film. If it is like this you have to also block User:Charles Turing who also uploaded one. The account creation, many people create a user account on wikipedia on a day maybe i will be one of them who created on that day. I used sandbox because i came to know that it can be used to make test edits when i read through the wikipedia guidelines.
If you think i am a bad one then i didn't done any bad works on wiki. User:Nairspecht also tanked me for my contribution here. I will claim that i don't know that guys. True!!
Decline reason:
Remember when you used to edit as DuplixD? You were blocked for abusing multiple accounts then. When that account was blocked, it meant that you, the editor behind that account, was no longer welcome to edit at Wikipedia. So please stop editing at Wikipedia and find a more constructive hobby. Maybe something in your hometown that benefits other people. You are welcome to request an unblock at the first account you used that was blocked, but we will never unblock a sockpuppet account. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:30, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
N Júnior (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Remember when you used to edit, who me?. How you claim that it is me tell me that also and first account whose first account this is my first. Infact User:Inside the Valley picked up some edits by those blocked ones and compared it with me. He will have some jealous of my contributions that i give here.
Decline reason:
See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DuplixD. Can you explain why there is technical evidence confirming a connection between this account and that of User:DuplixD? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:16, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Help
editCan anyone please help me. Is there any way to get unblocked. I don't know of what basis admins blocked me. I can't even make a new account. Anyone please tell me what is happening here. Is my system is hacked by admins!.
UTRS Account Request
editI confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. Júnior N
Last & Final words - സൗകര്യം ഇല്ല
editLooks like i have nothing more to do here. My 6 months journey in Wikipedia is ending here. Being an innocent they blocked me in the name of sockpuppet.
But i have something to say on Cyphoidbomb
editHello bomb you reviewed my unblock request and declined it, it's okay but you said another thing "So please stop editing at Wikipedia and find a more constructive hobby. Maybe something in your hometown that benefits other people." — the response for this is i have no facility. You are not supposed to talk me like that especially pointing about my interests. I think you are not Larry Sanger or Jimmy Wales (creators of Wikipedia) to command me. You are not my warden to obey your things directly and i am not your slave dude. Don't think that you are something great or perfect because of your admin rights. I will visit and edit Wikipedia if you have dare then block me. My account is only blocked i have my IP i will edit through it. You are just a user like me who started off here and became an admin. It doesn't mean that you have right to order people to stay away from here.
- Our CheckUser confirmed that you have been abusing multiple accounts. If you are under administrative sanctions, then you are not welcome to edit at Wikipedia. This is a community rule, not just my own. Per WP:REVERTBAN, any edit that can be attributed to you may be reverted by any user, regardless of whether it is constructive or not. This is a community rule, not just my own. Any article you create while you are under administrative sanctions may be deleted. This is a community rule, not my own. Now, as noted, you are welcome to request an unblock of your first account, but we will not unblock a sockpuppetry account. It would also require that you come clean about your block evasions, but based on your responses so far it seems you'd prefer to maintain the deception. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:06, 24 August 2016 (UTC)