UNLiMiTED TRUTH

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Bilderberg Group appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. ×××BrightBlackHeaven^(talk)××× 17:35, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Bilderberg Group, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:38, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:05, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

^^^^Seriously. It's not difficult. :) ×××BrightBlackHeaven^(talk)××× 20:37, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31h for edit warring. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

— Coren ^(talk) 23:32, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

• Your previous block was indefinite. If this request is declined, at least now it's only 1 day and 7 hours. mechamind90 23:52, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

It looks to me as though you are editing Wikipedia as an advocacy platform rather than to build an encyclopedia. I suggest you read up on our policies and see if your objectives are compatible with ours before proceeding further. I'm leaving your unblock request to be evaluated by another administrator, but for the record I will not object if they unblock you under supervision. — Coren ^(talk) 23:54, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

I was asking for assistance/advice on my 1st draft, didnt even post anything anywhere else, I was given the link by a kind member: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:UNLiMiTED_TRUTH/Bilderberg_Group Where I was told I could create a draft to check I was following Wiki guidelines before posting it.... Instead of giving me some guidelines you just block me??

Well, you started on the wrong foot, but seem to be trying. Just be extra careful to not edit other people's comments in the future, and be careful with advocacy. I'll unblock you now. Please read the policies I've linked to in my previous message. — Coren ^(talk) 00:15, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

• The only edit I made was to the Bilderberg page aprox 7h ago, I didn't edit anyone else posts, I simply added my own unaware of Wiki's policies. The post was subsequently deleted and I started talking on Orange Mike's talk about how I can create the post in a neutral informative manner with proper sources to back my post up unaware of these policies previously. I thought I was on the right track creating a draft and asking members for advice, its now apparent I am not. In regards to my post I sincerely tried including as much information as I can whilst remaining neutral and also including some positive statements to balance out the topic. As this post would be sectioned under conspiracy theory I thought there might be some allowance to the story. Trying to be balanced to a secret backstabbing is not easy and I did try hard to not let my own voice take over, In fact most of my post is simple copy paste for now from major news publications. I would really like some advice because I am now really confused as towhat is going on. All I want to do is share some information not many people know about, all of it RS and not promote a particular agenda but rather intellect and questioning. If your website doesnt support this, then I am in the wrong place, if it does I am sure we can find a way for me to create an informative neutral post with WK:RS. Thanks for any feedback, UNLiMiTED TRUTH (talk) 00:28, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

• • You removed other people's comments here on Orangemike's talk page, I think that was the problem. ×××BrightBlackHeaven^(talk)××× 07:30, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
  • The phrase A remarkable speech of courage, most likely the one that cost him his life does not show any kind of neutral point of view; instead, it reeks of conspiracy-theory thinking. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:47, 18 May 2010 (UTC)