Uinio89

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tulleys Farm has been accepted

Tulleys Farm, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 02:30, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

January 2021

Hello Uinio89. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Uinio89. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Uinio89|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 15:13, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

I have disclosed my affiliation on my user page. Uinio89 (talk) 16:25, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you but that's not enough. As per WP:PAID you are required to provide links to your profiles on all sites where you "advertise, solicit or obtain paid Wikipedia-editing services" to fully comply with the policy. Also, please don't create the same draft under different titles and edit Draft:Surfshark instead but before that, you need to fully comply with the paid editing policies. GSS ^💬 17:22, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

I don't have any profile, Surfshark asked me to create the page. I work for them as an SEO consultant.Uinio89 (talk) 17:57, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Are you sure? because there is evidence off-wiki that it came from Upwork and I'm open to sharing those details with an admin. GSS ^💬 18:03, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I don't have a profile on Upwork. Provide details if you have.Uinio89 (talk) 18:06, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Uinio89, while it's good that you have disclosed your COI on your user page, the disclosure is supposed to also include a mention of the fact that you are being paid (and by whom), and also needs to be restated at the talk page of the affected article(s). Note as well that you should not remove any maintenance tags from these articles, and should leave that to editors who do not have conflicts of interest. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:56, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Surfshark has been accepted

Surfshark, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 15:44, 27 January 2021 (UTC)