26 February 2015 Malik, I'm sorry about the changes to the MLK page. I am a writing instructor and was teaching a lesson on why Wikipedia is great for housing research but can be unreliable when it comes to actual content (in other words, you wouldn't necessarily want to quote it). I was showing them that pretty much anyone can edit articles, and I guess I forgot to log out. I apologize for this oversight. -Guy Spriggs
- No problem.
— Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:35, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
August 2010
editPlease do not add material to Wikipedia pages in violation of copyright, as you attempted to do at University of Kentucky College of Arts and Sciences, but were prevented by an edit filter. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:24, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
James,
Thanks for your response to my issue. I must say, however, that I am still confused. I understand that your filter caught something, but is there any way to know what it caught? I don't know what copyrighted information was contained in the Wikipedia entry I tried to save. I understand that you are busy, but is there any way you could explain further for me?
-Guy
- Unfortunately I don't really understand edit filters, and I too have no way of knowing what it objected to in your attempted post. I saw that it had caught something, and so I looked at what you had tried to post, and discovered a copyright issue, so I thought it might help to let you know about that. However, I have no idea what triggered the edit filter. Sorry I can't be any more help. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:20, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- One of the names in the text you were posting is that of a figure who has been harassed and libeled by a banned editor with a distinctive style. That alone wouldn't trigger the filter, but the style of text you were using also did. If you want more details, please reply to the email I've sent you (the filter details are private so that the methods will be difficult to evade; the explanation will seem almost unbelievable anyway). Also, I want to make sure that there is not a copyright violation in here. If you are sure there is no text copied directly from another source or closely paraphrased, then I will be happy to post the information for you, butI think it needs to be cleaned up in other ways as well (the formatting of the section headers will come out looking strange, for example). I'm not sure it's adequately referenced either, but you seem to understand the need for references so that is a comparatively minor problem, Im sure. —Soap— 23:37, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- I will help you post the article if I can be sure there is no copyright violation there. I've asked JamesBWatson to explain what it was. If he was mistaken or if the newer version has no copyvio then there should be no problem. —Soap— 10:10, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- One of the names in the text you were posting is that of a figure who has been harassed and libeled by a banned editor with a distinctive style. That alone wouldn't trigger the filter, but the style of text you were using also did. If you want more details, please reply to the email I've sent you (the filter details are private so that the methods will be difficult to evade; the explanation will seem almost unbelievable anyway). Also, I want to make sure that there is not a copyright violation in here. If you are sure there is no text copied directly from another source or closely paraphrased, then I will be happy to post the information for you, butI think it needs to be cleaned up in other ways as well (the formatting of the section headers will come out looking strange, for example). I'm not sure it's adequately referenced either, but you seem to understand the need for references so that is a comparatively minor problem, Im sure. —Soap— 23:37, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, I meant to post back here earlier. I started a section at User talk:JamesBWatson#Ukguyspriggs and he replied with what looks like a pretty convincing argument. I would not be willing to endorse the re-creation of a page that contained even a little bit of text from a copyrighted webpage; perhaps if you haven't got time to go over the whole article now you could post just a stub and expand it slowly? This would allow the other people viewing the page to help (though there's no guarantee anyone would; some articles sit for years with basically just one author). —Soap— 00:02, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
August 2010
edit
Your addition to University of Kentucky College of Arts and Sciences has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. -FASTILY (TALK) 00:37, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
February 2015
edit
Hello, I'm Malik Shabazz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Martin Luther King Jr. because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:33, 25 February 2015 (UTC)