January 2007

edit
 

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Middleware. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. — Isilanes 15:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Common Object Request Broker Architecture. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. — Isilanes 15:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Model-driven architecture. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. — Isilanes 15:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Firewall (networking). It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. — Isilanes 15:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Object request broker. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. — Isilanes 15:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

February 2007

edit

Hi Ulrich,

You ask me why I deleted your January 21st contributions. Please take a careful look at them.

You made a 20 minutes rampage of editions, in which you added links to the same web site to 5 different pages, plus a reference to a work authored by yourself. These editions are your only contribution ever to Wikipedia.

Did you consider that Wikipedia is not a place for self promotion? What is to stop anyone from thinking that you created an account with the sole purpose of inserting these links? While anyone is prone to think that the jobs of oneself are great, Wikipedia's policy prefers linking sources considered relevant by third persons. Please read the Wikipedia policy on how not to be a spammer, and rethink of how correct your editions and my reversions were.

Anyway, you are gladly welcome to make further corrections, additions and any improvement you see fit in the Wikipedia, and you could regard my reversions as incorrect as I regarded your editions. If you think an article misses relevant links, and some dimwit (as myself), reverts your additions, please comment the subject in the talk page of the given article, and ask people for their opinion. — Isilanes 12:37, 12 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: ObjectSecurity (December 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Primefac (talk) 02:39, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Draft:ObjectSecurity concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:ObjectSecurity, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 24 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:ObjectSecurity

edit
 

Hello, Ulrichlang. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "ObjectSecurity".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:ObjectSecurity}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:46, 6 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:ObjectSecurity has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:ObjectSecurity. Thanks! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:40, 21 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: ObjectSecurity (July 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JMHamo was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JMHamo (talk) 15:18, 21 July 2015 (UTC)Reply