User talk:Ultraexactzz/Archive 7
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ultraexactzz. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
This archive includes edits to User talk:Ultraexactzz from October 2008 through August 2009. I had withdrawn from editing during much of this period.
Deletion
Under other circumstances I'd tell you you have an awesome page.
After creating my account and looking through all the myriads of options and pages involved in being a new Wikipedian, part of that is looking at userboxes, and as I don't have my own computer, I simply saved the list of possibilities under hidden comment until I had time to go through them all. So, because I save my work-in-progess on my own page under hidden comment, which nobody is ever going to look at when there's no text on the page, the page was deleted. That is, I noticed the link to my page was red, said to myself "what the hell," and clicked the link which brought up a blank page and a deletion notice.
However, I am also confused, because clicking on "RayvnEQ" at the top of the menu bar shows me a page, and when I hit the edit button, it also shows me a list of hidden comment. Yet, the link to my page on my watchlist still appears red. I have no way of knowing whether the list of user boxes under hidden comment when I click "edit" from my menubar is complete. This whole thing is confusing but I need to make sure that 1) my page exists and 2) every userbox I had choosen for consideration to eliminate or keep from my user page when I finish it is kept within the hidden comment. (I do not own a computer, so I cannot keep a notepad file on said non-existent computer.) Also, some of the userboxes were on a hidden comment on the talk page of my name, because I mistakenly put them there, so I need to make sure those are still there as well. (And if so, I will move them to hidden on my actual page.) Please help.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=RayvnEQ
~ Rayvn (talk) 22:46, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Reply:
- Yes please add the deleted content to whatever is already on my user page. It will be easier to sort it out then it will be to start over. (Put in under the hidden comment with everything else as it is just a list of userboxes that I am trying to narrow down, and maybe a few other things). I must have gone to the wrong area when I submitted it. Thank you.Rayvn (talk) 09:52, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
RfD nomination of Cat:Language icons
I have nominated Cat:Language icons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 02:41, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
RfA
Hi Ultraexactzz! Thank you very much for your support in my RfA, which passed yesterday. I hope not to let you and the others down, and use the tools for the benefit of the project. Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 22:51, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello
Just a question, how is it going with the Recommend phase of the RfA review, specifically when will each person's response be posted as in the anonymous responses. Where will you post them? Thanks Monster Under Your Bed (talk) 13:09, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
I moved the page to Family Online Safety Institute from my userpage. I just wanted to ask if you could double check to make sure it is successfully moved and appears to be working. also, thank you so much for all your patient help/edits with the page. I really appreciate it. Pastadog42 (talk) 02:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
RfA thanks
|
Thank you for participating in my RfA, which recently passed with 126 in support, 22 in opposition and 6 neutral votes.
Thanks for your support in my RFA!!
|
regarding 79.73.115.236
I see you posted, lifting an autoblock. I'd suggest waiting a bit longer next time, or asking the blocking admin. This IP has not been used for anything other than Tom Sayle socks, as far back as CU can see. So there's no reason to lift the block, and no risk of collateral damage. The newest user is yet another sock. ++Lar: t/c 14:44, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
ArbCom elections
Hi there,
I'm writing an article for the Signpost newspaper, and would like to ask you if you could just check my work so far, on the process part of the elections. I've just been in a discussion where someone said questions wouldn't be open until the 17th, and I wasn't aware of that. Since you've been quite active on that talk page, I thought you'd be able to help me and let me know if my work is accurate. Thanks. – How do you turn this on (talk) 21:11, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi
Hi Ultraexactzz, pleased to meet you. Thank you for reverting the vandalism on the Jat people page.
The Jat people page has been under heavy anon vandal attack. The Sikh article (I also worked on the Sikh article last year) was under similar anon heavy vandal attack last year but a administrator semi protected the page indefinitely and us editors were able to create a very nice article. Please can you semi-protect the Jat people indefinitely so we can do similar job of producing a very good article without these constant vandal attacks.
Many anon users have been vandalising the article including the following user who keeps on vandalising the article by adding uncited information which is not correct. He has done this on the Kashmiri people article and many others, see his talk page. Here are the separate occasions:
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jat_people&diff=prev&oldid=250150102
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jat_people&diff=prev&oldid=249391904
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jat_people&diff=prev&oldid=249324466
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jat_people&diff=prev&oldid=249170946
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jat_people&diff=prev&oldid=249170820
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jat_people&diff=prev&oldid=249106294
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jat_people&diff=prev&oldid=248718489
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jat_people&diff=prev&oldid=248601778
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jat_people&diff=prev&oldid=248392048
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jat_people&diff=prev&oldid=248182938
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jat_people&diff=prev&oldid=245434438
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jat_people&diff=prev&oldid=244989711
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jat_people&diff=prev&oldid=244120140
He has been warned and blocked on many occasions but still continues, blocking him has no affect. He just changes ip:
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3A24.185.128.31
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:24.185.128.31
The only long-term solution is a similar one to the one done by an admin on the Sikh article Semi-protect indefinitely this allow users to build a nice article without it being destroyed by anon vandals. Once the vandal disruption is gone someone can ask for un-protection. Please can you help us out here. Thank you.--Peter johnson4 (talk) 15:27, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you about Jat people
Thank you Ultraexactzz, it has helped but if this anon or others come back in 1 months time to vandalise again. We will need your help again and I will make a similar request for help. P.S. The reason why you have these anons vandalising the article is because it is about an ethnic group so similar reasons to why the Jewish people article is protected indefinitely, it is a high risk article for vandalism just like this article. Its a big set of people. It needs to be kept an eye on like the Jewish people article. I will come back to you if in 1 months time it starts up again. Thank you once again.--Peter johnson4 (talk) 15:47, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Hi Ultraexactzz, thank you for your reply. Yes, agreed, we can take your "wait and see approach" if the article after 1 month is Ok with no anon vandal attacks then this is a acceptable situation. However, if after 1 month the same thing kicks off again with anons vandalizing the article and adding uncited information, then I really see no other responsible option but to semi-protect indefinitely to solve the problem once and for all. P.S I think your cat is very beautiful, Is it a girl or boy?--Peter johnson4 (talk) 19:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Request
Could you proffer some sage advice for a lady at my talk page User_talk:MBisanz#Could_you_be_my_knight_in_shining_armour, much thanks. MBisanz talk 22:01, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)
The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:15, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Misdirected soft redirect?
From looking at your contribs, where you were redirecting candidate question talk pages to the candidate vote talk pages, I think you might have copied and pasted the wrong link here. I think you meant to direct people to here, not here. If I have that right, would you be able to fix it? Carcharoth (talk) 01:36, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Look Man or woman
Look man or woman quit deleting other people stuff.I put alot of time in trying to develope the WCW Smackdown.So leave my page alone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khooks0315 (talk • contribs) 15:43, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
My Rfa
|
|
Ultraexactzz, thank you very much for participating in my Rfa, which was successful with 80 Support, 5 Oppose, 6 Neutral. The comments were overwhelming, and hopefully I can live up to the expectation of the community.
I would also like to thank my nominator Realist2 and my co-nom Orane (talk), and special mention to Acalamari and Lenticel (talk) for the kindness from the start. Regards, Efe |
Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.
Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 42 | 8 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 43 | 10 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 44 | 17 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 11:06, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello
Can you please add the general questions to Gwen Gale. Thank You 211.30.109.24 (talk) 04:48, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Election questions
Hi - are you a 2008 ArbCom elections officer? I need some help and advice about the way my election questions page is being edited. I assumed that one section is one thread is me and one other editor, rather than a free-for-all forum. For the third time this threading discipline is not being respected. Please advise or refer me to someone else, if you can? Charles Matthews (talk) 14:39, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Charles's questions page
Hi Ultra, thank you for your note. I don't want to seem argumentative for the hell of it, but Charles did post some serious inaccuracies about me, e.g. that I was sending him "nuisance mail," which I wasn't, and that he e-mailed me information about the issue under discussion yesterday, which he didn't. Removing my response allows those inaccuracies to stand uncorrected. I feel that voters should be allowed to read comments and responses and judge for themselves. Does it explicitly say somewhere that threaded discussion is not allowed on questions pages? SlimVirgin talk|edits 19:35, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, that's just ridiculous. On my mail "to" you, it is coming via Jimmy Wales as you would expect, no? I have explained this now on the talk page over there. Whatever made you think that "candidate questions" was the right place to raise a single missing email?
- I brought in a neutral umpire, on all that business, for a good reason. Arguing with the match officials is rightly frowned upon. Pressurise Ultraexactzz all you like. It doesn't actually give you the slightest right to dictate in the matter here. We can go into you spamming me another time. And why ElinorD seems to know a great deal about a private correspondence, and so on. I somehow doubt this is of quite as much interest to voters as you make out. Charles Matthews (talk) 21:29, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- Charles, you've got the cheek of the devil. :-) You ask Ultraexactzz to do something, and it's perfectly legitimate. I ask him, and I'm "arguing with match officials." You start an e-mail correspondence with me, but I'm spamming you if my responses deviate from your idea of an acceptable exchange. (I asked if I could post them on a subpage — may I? — then people can see for themselves.) You feel free to copy my e-mails to a journalist without my consent, but if ElinorD appears to know anything about the matter, I must have sent her e-mails illicitly. Come on ... what's sauce for the goose etc. SlimVirgin talk|edits 21:47, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply, Ultra. What I'd like to do, unless you have strong objections, is copy my post into the section of the question page that I started for my questions to Charles (one of which was about the same issue). I only added the post to Elinor's section because I felt Charles had posted some things that weren't accurate. SlimVirgin talk|edits 22:14, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- Who's joking now? I make a random choice of election official and ask for a view. I'm a candidate and this would be the right thing to do. It's my page you're scribbling on, you know. And which part of "formally terminated" do you not understand? Yes, of course you can put questions in sections on the page, as long as you don't jump into other people's and start a three-ring circus while you're at it. Please read the message at the top of the page and conform to it. Charles Matthews (talk) 23:03, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Vote stats
See Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2008#Vote_stats. Can you help? — Rlevse • Talk • 22:00, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)
The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:44, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:AfD Debates withdrawn by nominator
I have nominated Category:AfD Debates withdrawn by nominator (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 23:43, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Disclaimer editnotices
Hi. I see you added editnotices to the disclaimers (MediaWiki:Editnotice-4-General disclaimer, etc). We realized some times ago that only users who are able to edit the page can view the editnotice, and those are fully protected. So we have the choice between rewriting them so that it is addressed to sysops if needed, or deleting them. What do you think ? Cenarium (Talk) 23:44, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009
Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 45 | 24 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 46 | 1 December 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| ArbCom elections: Elections open | Wikipedia in the news |
| WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System | Features and admins |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 1 | 3 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)
The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:14, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 2 | 10 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 20:48, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Request
Hey, Ultraexactzz. Some other admins and I are working on a project here that we'd like to work on a bit before we bring it to the wider attention of the community. Would you mind taking a look? Hersfold (t/a/c) 05:46, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 3 | 17 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 01:11, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 4 | 24 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Delivered at 05:29, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable)
Happy Birthday!
|
Happy Birthday, Ultraexactzz/Archive 7, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! |
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
|
|
Wishing Ultraexactzz/Archive 7 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Willking1979 (talk) 14:25, 31 January 2009 (UTC) |
Wikipedia Signpost, January 31, 2009
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 5 | 31 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 22:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 6 | 8 February 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:20, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)
The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:40, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 08:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:
- Philosophers analyze Wikipedia as a knowledge source
- An automated article monitoring system for WikiProjects
- News and notes: Wikimania, usability, picture contest, milestones
- Wikipedia in the news: Lessons for Brits, patent citations
- Dispatches: Hundredth Featured sound approaches
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Islam
- Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:22, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
- Books extension enabled
- News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's role in journalism, Smarter Wikipedia, Skittles
- Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)
The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:06, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:36, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
- News and notes: Commons, conferences, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Politics, more politics, and more
- Dispatches: 100 Featured sounds milestone
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Christianity
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 01:29, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009
— 16 March 2009- News and notes: License update, Commons cartoons, films milestone, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Manufactured scandal, Wikipedia assignments, and more
- Dispatches: New FAC and FAR appointments
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:29, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 07:22, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
: 23 March 2009
- From the editor: Reviewing books for the Signpost
- Special report: Abuse Filter is enabled
- News and notes: Flaggedrevs, copyright project, fundraising reports, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Alternatives, IWF threats, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:45, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
: 30 March 2009
- From the editor: Follow the Signpost with RSS and Twitter
- Special report: Community weighs license update
- News and notes: End of Encarta, flagged revisions poll, new image donation, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Censorship, social media in schools, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)
The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 06:47, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
: 6 April 2009
- Special report: Interactive OpenStreetMap features in development
- News and notes: Statistics, Wikipedia research and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikia Search abandoned, university plagiarism, and more
- Dispatches: New FAC and FAR nomination process
- WikiProject report: WikiProject China
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:56, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of User:Andreawestrich/Sandbox
A tag has been placed on User:Andreawestrich/Sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Alexius08 (talk) 11:15, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
: 13 April 2009
- License update: Licensing vote begins
- News and notes: WMF petitions Obama, longer AFDs, UK meeting, and more
- Dispatches: Let's get serious about plagiarism
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Color
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 17:06, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
: 27 April 2009
- Book reviews: Reviews of Lazy Virtues: Teaching Writing in the Age of Wikipedia
- News and notes: Usability study, Wiki Loves Art, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia Art dispute, and brief headlines
- WikiProject report: Interview on WikiProject Final Fantasy
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 05:01, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)
The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:32, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
: 11 May 2009
- News and notes: Wikimania 2010, usability project, link rot, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Quote hoax replicated in traditional media, and more
- Dispatches: WikiProject Birds reaches an FA milestone
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Michael Jackson
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:34, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
: 18 May 2009
- From the editor: Writers needed
- Special report: WikiChemists and Chemical Abstracts announce collaboration
- Special report: Embassies sponsor article-writing contests in three languages
- News and notes: Wiki Loves Arts winners, Wikimania Conference Japan, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Arbitrator blogs, French government edits, brief headlines
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Opera
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:44, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
: 25 May 2009
- License update: Licensing vote results announced, resolution passed
- News and notes: New board member, flagged revisions, Eurovision interviews
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia: threat or menace?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject LGBT studies
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
: 1 June 2009
- From the editor: Browsing the archives
- Book review: Review of The Future of the Internet
- Scientology: End of Scientology arbitration brings blocks, media coverage
- News and notes: Picture of the Year, Wikipedia's first logo, Board elections, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Tamil Wikipedia, Internet Watch Foundation, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 23:12, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)
The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:19, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Please comment on political straw polls
The article Straw polls for the 2008 United States presidential election and its associated pages were deleted as of 9 Nov 2008, and the deletions are now being reviewed. Because of your prior involvement, please comment at Wikipedia:Deletion review#Straw polls for the 2008 United States presidential election. Thank you for your consideration! 20 involved editors are being notified. JJB 19:13, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
: 15 June 2009
- Book review :Review of Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes
- News and notes: License update, Google Translate, GLAM conference, Paid editing
- Wikipedia in the news: In the Google News, London Review of Books, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Chemistry
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:30, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
: 22 June 2009
- Special report:Study of vandalism survival times
- News and notes: Wikizine, video editing, milestones
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia impacts town's reputation, assorted blogging
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
: 6 July 2009
- News and notes: Commons grant, license change, new chapters, usability and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia and kidnapping, new comedy series
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Food and Drink
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:49, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)
The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:25, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
: 27 July 2009
- From the editor: Welcome to the build-your-own edition of the Signpost
- Board elections: Board of Trustees elections draw 18 candidates for 3 seats
- Wiki-Conference: Wikimedians and others gather for Wiki-Conference New York
- Wikipedia Academy: Volunteers lead Wikipedia Academy at National Institutes of Health
- News and notes: Things that happened in the Wikimedia world
- Wikipedia in the news: Assorted news coverage of Wikipedia
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Oregon
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 14:40, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
: 3 August 2009
- News and notes: WMF elections, strategy wiki, museum partnerships, and much more
- Wikipedia in the news: Dispute over Rorschach test images, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 06:45, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)
The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:21, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
: 10 August 2009
- Special story: Tropenmuseum to host partnered exhibit with Wikimedia community
- News and notes: Tech news, strategic planning, BLP task force, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Shrinking community, GLAM-Wiki, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 06:09, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
: 17 August 2009
- From the editor: Where should the Signpost go from here?
- Radio review: Review of Bigipedia radio series
- News and notes: Three million articles, Chen, Walsh and Klein win board election, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Reports of Wikipedia's imminent death greatly exaggerated, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:46, 18 August 2009 (UTC)