UnicovW

UnicovW, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi UnicovW! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ...Modernist (talk) 18:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your last edit to this link is not acceptable: [1]...Modernist (talk) 18:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Try writing an article without making mistakes, numbskull.... UnicovW (talk) 18:11, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Pieter Bruegel the Elder shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. freshacconci talk to me 18:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Piss off with your regulations. Try writing an article without using wrong information and sources. Unbelievable. What a bunch of numbskulls.... UnicovW (talk) 18:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Talk:Pieter Bruegel the Elder. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. freshacconci talk to me 18:26, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Tell that to your friends. Are you people's ego's too big to admit you're wrong? This is beyond pathetic. UnicovW (talk) 18:29, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:UnicovW reported by User:Freshacconci (Result: ). Thank you. freshacconci talk to me 18:33, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Can I protest against this? I consider myself to be invaluable for the Wikipedia-project. UnicovW (talk) 18:49, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

"If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}." MereTechnicality ⚙ 20:03, 17 February 2017 (UTC)