Unknown

Wikipedia:Babel

enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.

Search user languages

Are you a real user?

This is a rather confusing username! MrBeast 20:08, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I am.

Yes, I know. Unknown 23:26, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Whee.

Unknown (talk) 21:24, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

==Sockpuppetry case==

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lawlar for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. moɳo 00:04, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

This was a mistake by user:mono - you have been removed from the case. Sorry about that, Airplaneman ✈ 21:39, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

I'm sure that you are very fond of your user name....

...but I think you also might agree that seeing "Unknown" might be confusing to people, making them think that somehow the editor involved couldn't be identified. Since your account was created so long ago, and because it doesn't violate any of the specific rules about usernames, I don't think that if I brought it to the attention of WP:UAA anything would happen, but I thought you might be amenable to changing it in some way that ameliorated the problem. I don't think you're under any obligation to do so, but it sure would be community-minded if you did so. Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:15, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

I really do like my username

... and I have been using it for quite a while. I don't think it's causing any problems. Unknown (talk) 18:26, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/unknown, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Hearfourmewesique (talk) 14:11, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I used Twinkle to report the other editor and instead of an unknown user, it marked you because of your username . Feel free to ignore the SPI altogether. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 14:18, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Unknown, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

CatcherStorm ^talk 17:05, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

As before, you are mistaken. Unknown (talk) 20:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Unknown, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Legacypac (talk) 19:05, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Miracle of Lanciano

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Miracle_of_Lanciano#%22Scientific_tests%22_-_a_joke

would you like to look at that page again?Mr. bobby (talk) 09:29, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

bjjrank

hey @Unknown! wanted to share w you the doc for the template to try to keep it consistent, thanks! RGNROK- (talk) 17:45, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll keep that in mind. Unknown (talk) 17:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Laputa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laputa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laputa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Natg 19 (talk) 20:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)