UnknownPro
September 2017
editHello, I'm DMacks. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks. Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.
In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please, only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! DMacks (talk) 16:03, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
UnknownPro, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi UnknownPro! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:03, 2 September 2017 (UTC) |
My MMJ account
editCorbin Estep | |
---|---|
Also known as | PokéPlay |
I had PokéPlay as my Music Maker Jam account, which label I'm signed in into?
September 2017
editHello, I'm Jd22292. I noticed that you recently removed content from Monstercat without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not remove redlinks. These redlinks exist in case users wish to create articles in the future. Please do, however, continue to remove redirect loops. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 05:51, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:UnknownPro, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. When I created that last warning, I noticed the refactor. You are allowed to remove comments on your own Talk page, but please do not refactor them. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 05:52, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Monstercat WP:OR errors of wrong without new section
edit@JJ, there's none of this is false info of without this UnknownPro (talk) 16:00, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- I have moved our discussion from my User Talk page to the appropriate article, where other users can discuss the issues you and many other IP editors have about this topic. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 16:33, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Please also note that Wikipedia is WP:NOTAFORUM about the subject. Talk pages are meant to be a discussion about improving the article itself. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 16:34, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Hmm, what different backgrounds they use UnknownPro (talk) 16:35, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
WRLD's song By Design is having a rare background UnknownPro (talk) 16:36, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Welcome
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:UnknownPro, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. This includes changing images to look like something else. Please do not do this. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 20:43, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
September 2017
editThis is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 01:35, 27 September 2017 (UTC)- For continued explicit harassment ("invasion" of edits and falsely attempting to mark a user as blocked). No matter what editorial dispute might occur over the course of Wikipedia work, this sort of behaviour is never appropriate. Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 01:37, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Tornsado
editAre you Tornsado? According to this, that user (who is Tornsado on here) has admitted that their account is UnknownPro on Wikipedia. I might have said this yeah but I want to avoid making any false accusations if this isn't the same user. I'm trying to avoid making personal attacks founded on no evidence that I can prove (as we have policies against personal attacks), but it's also against the policy to make a sockpuppet. I'm personally familiar with the Tornsado sockpuppeteer who has caused problems on wiki sites. Cosmic Clone (talk) 21:23, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
No. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UnknownPro (talk • contribs)
Okay, then, but please cease claims about Porygon's episode being wiped internally - that's something Tornsado had done here months ago, and also claimed today's episode shouldn't exist because of the supposed "blackface" Cosmog. Also, please WP:SIGN your comments. Cosmic Clone (talk) 12:51, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
They claimed the porygon episode is recovered and its not banned anymore, In 2017, TV Tokyo deleted the Pokémon shock scene. UnknownPro (talk) 01:00, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
So Im a racer of Racing rivals as "Gittgiver" UnknownPro (talk) 01:01, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
October 2017
editThis is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Underwater diving, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I see you've done quite a bit of vandalism at Today's Featured Article; you're very close to losing your editing privileges here. RexxS (talk) 18:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
editHi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/UnknownPro, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.