User talk:User1389/Deletion discussion
Your position is highly biased. The list contains data of the year when IOC recognized particular committee and not the year of creation. 1911 is the best choice even if 1912 would be even better. And you very well know why!
I will repeat once more. The list at the article National olympic committee contains years when IOC recognized. Serbian Olympic Committee was formed in 1911 and most likely recognized that same year. But nobody can find any data that the recognition happened in Stockholm so you better refrain yourself from changing the data back (1911 to 1910). The only thing worth discutting is marking the recognition in 1912 when Serbia competeed in the Olympic.
Stop your edit-war on National Olympic Committee (article)
editThe list contains countries listed by their year of recognition by the IOC. NOT their year of foundation. I have been very kind to the "issue" when listed Serbia in the year 1911 - WHY? (You would say!)
Because the OKS explained on their history web-page that there are no documents to colaborate this theory that OKS was recognized in 1911.
The best choice would be to write that the recognition happened in 1912 - because Serbia participated in the Olympic Games that year.
If you would insist in violating this list by inserting Serbia in the year 1910 - I would have no other choice - but to report your doing to the administrators.