Userpsy
Welcome!
Hello, Userpsy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 21:27, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Please don't delete other people's comments from Talk pages, such as you did at Talk:Torsion field. Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 21:27, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Please don't add your own opinion to articles like Torsion field. Discuss your problems with the article on its Talk page. Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 21:29, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torsion field. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 21:30, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Torsion field, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Torsion field was changed by Userpsy (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-11-27T21:30:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:30, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
November 2008
edit
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Torsion field. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. DiverseMentality 21:50, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Torsion field. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 21:57, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Welcome! Here are a bunch of tips for you!
edit
Block notice
edit
{{unblock|Please unban me because i cannot unblock myself THE BOT NEVER ANSWER ! And please tell if someone can check my source before i add it to torsion_field page because i really dont want to get banned again ! Thank you !Also please tell me the exact sentence wich i was blocked for so i wont add it again !}}
- As far as I can see, you have been blocked for diruption of the article torsion field by wanton removal of content, posting your opinion in the article, and promotion of pseudoscience as a fact. In addition, self-published content on various websites, let alone discussion boards, does not constitute a reliable source. (You should probably have a look at Wikipedia guidelines on coverage of fringe theories.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:42, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Userpsy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
How can you say that me is douing a promotion of pseudoscience? when torsion_field is not present and explained clearly in any 3`rd part newspaper as a pseudoscience? PLease read the sources that admit torsion_field as pseudoscience!! THe only sources to admit that there really is pseudoscience are only skeptic and pseudoscience based sources! Here are your sources: http://humanism.al.ru/en/index.phtml - personal website - where Ehduard Kruglyakov image is everywhere - he is the only one to admit that torsion field is pseudoscience - read on google why he is douing that ! - personal interests ! http://www.skeptik.net This can only suggest Attack! Please delete the subject until Serious academic journals prove that torsion field are pseudoscience !
Decline reason:
Nothing in your Reason for unblocking gives any rationale for unblocking. Please see the guide. —Travistalk 22:05, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 01:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
December 2008
edit
The recent edit you made to Torsion field constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 01:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Torsion field. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. siℓℓy rabbit (talk) 01:41, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
{{helpme}} Torsion field is a new information for the people on earth! Its clear that for a long time noone will come to make things right on the page!
I am new here (4 days) and i really didnt thought that there are so many rules! I didnt read any ..and that was a big mistake as i now realize, so i want to sincerely apologize for everything, first i thought to delete everything and replace with my sources..:)cant be called vandalism if someone really consider that everything about the subject is an error.. but here the rules are very clear and i must respect them! Also didnt knew that i must not edit more then 3 times a day the contents..but i payed more attention now and i saw the warning after reading closer...so i got into reading seriously the rules!
I noticed that the rules apply only to me... and that makes me sad! I saw on the first paragraph error definition of Torsion Field, that a lot of rules are broken as Attack -fraud word use to describe torsion field paragraph!!?? - non-Neutral point of view and non academical newspapers, unreliable sources(skeptic and pseudoscientific based sources 1,5 links-references the only one to sustain the claim of pseudoscience) but when i posted my sources..they were all deleted because they dont follow the rules! I am really confused why the rules are applied only to me! So now i am afraid to even post anything because i will be banned again - its clear that doesnt matter the source, it always will be a way to consider it unreliable and deleted by admins!
What can be done about this page? We just leave it like this 1 line on google with the biggest lie as definition? I just want to help wikipedia and improve informations with reliable sources! I have sources wich presents 3 countryes (France, Romania, Ukraine) with Video sources, international expositions, University of Defence,unesco etc. involved and selling this devices of generating torsion field,so its clear 100% that is not a pseudoscience!
The only thing i care now are the rules! but i prefer to leave if they are respected only by me! So i have this request: THe subject to be deleted because there is noone to vote for apart skeptics and me because is very subtle,new information or just help me present my sources without being every day in front of the computer and thinking why i am banned when i respect the rules!! also modify and keep the real definition from the patent website sources! so noone can ever change it! at list only the definition (so to be neutral)without any other data for the moment until the world will use the technology everywhere.. Note: torsion field - KGB Russia - minimum 500million rubles for this project.. so is not pseudoscience at all! The user definition is bad intention!
- Make your case on the talk page of the article and convince them that you are correct by referencing WP:Reliable sources. If you need specific help, perhaps seek out advice from one of the Wikipedia noticeboards. If you cannot convince them you are correct, then accept defeat. DoubleBlue (talk) 06:33, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edits
editHi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:26, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
publicity of your product in talk pages
edit Please don't post to Talk:Torsion_field promotions of your website or of the product that you sell at your product. Also, don't post conferences that don't contribute towards making changes to the article, and that are actually being used as promotion for your product. --Enric Naval (talk) 17:26, 3 December 2009 (UTC)