Getting started
|
|
Finding your way around
|
|
Editing articles
|
|
|
Getting help
|
|
How you can help
|
|
|
|
Hi, VS 78. I just wanted to warn you of a policy here called the three revert rule. Typically, users are not allowed to revert, either in whole or in part, other people's contributions more than three times within a 24 hour period, if it is not vandalism. When tensions are high on controversial topics, like The Great Global Warming Swindle, it's always best to bring your contentions to the talk page. I have no reason to believe you have or will break this policy, and I agree Corwin8's contributions are slightly disruptive. Cheers, ~ UBeR 19:28, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
- Thanks for the heads up, UBeR. I guess this is where it gets hard to tell the difference between a revert and an "improvement." For today I would say that I truly reverted portions of Corwin8's contributions only twice, but it could have been three times or more. For the most part I tried to improve the contributions, since a fair amount of the time valid input was suggested. -VS 78 19:56, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
- Yes, I agree. ~ UBeR 21:43, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply