Val.kueh

Welcome!

Hello, Val.kueh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as YieldAds, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 09:38, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of YieldAds

A tag has been placed on YieldAds, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 09:38, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

YieldAds

How I do improve this article so that it does not get deleted?

Appreciate the help.

Val.kueh (talk) 09:54, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

First read WP:ORG for hints on how to determine whether this organisation is notable enough to merit a Wikipedia article. Then add references from reliable, independent sources that back up this notability. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 10:01, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

I've removed most of the unambiguous advertising parts. Does this article still violate section G11?

Thanks.

Val.kueh (talk) 10:11, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Apparently so, as it's been deleted. Speak to the admin who deleted the article, ask them to userfy the article so you can continue to edit it in your user space. You really need to be able to demonstrate that the company is important by referencing newspaper and magazine articles etc. that talk about the company in a non-trivial way. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 10:26, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

YieldAds

I have userfied this for you at User:Val.kueh/YieldAds - work on it there and when you are happy, ask an Admin to replace it in the workspace for you.

Good luck Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere! ^(Whisper...) 15:52, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Ah, thanks a bunch. :)

Val.kueh (talk) 02:38, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi. Can you review the article again and see if it's ok to go live this time?

Thanks.

EDIT: Ah, nevermind, just saw what you wrote on your talk page. Thanks.

Val.kueh (talk) 06:43, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

• What you really need to get in there is some reliable sources that are fully independent of the subject. If this company is indeed notable, somebody somewhere will have written about them. Newspaper articles are great indicators of notability... have a look on Google News Archive for example, or use a site specific Google search on newspapers that you think are likely to have articles about this company. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 09:46, 5 October 2010 (UTC)