Validvt

Neutral point of view

Hello! Wikipedia has a policy of trying to present a neutral point of view on any controversial topics, including politics. I've reverted an edit of yours on the Anthony Pollina page, which seemed to include Pollina's platform verbatim, which is a fairly clear violation of the neutral point of view policy. If you want to include verifiable facts about the candidate that don't violate the neutral point of view policy, please fell free to do so. If you want to quote from his platform, that is OK, as long as you make it clear that you are presenting a quote rather than stating something that is an arguable opinion as fact. For most of his platform, however, simply linking to his website would probably be better than trying to include it as quotes on Wikipedia. Let me know if you have any questions on the policy; you can click on my "talk" link and contact me there! — λ (talk) 19:16, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Maurice Doubleday. Thank you. — λ (talk) 15:05, 30 October 2008 (UTC)