Valmataro
Welcome!
editHello, Valmataré, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! -- Wywin (talk | contribs) 16:01, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
{{help me}} Thanks Wywin. It's my first day and I am rather confused. I'd like to contribute content in editing, especially editing for academic and scholarly publication. I've already drafted a few pieces in my sandbox (language professional, author editing, developmental editing). The problem is that the most likely place to start, Editing, is edit-protected. Should I ask for my pages to be created, or wait until I can contribute to Editing?--Valmataré (talk) 16:09, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hey! I haven't really dug too deep, but you should be able to edit it in 4 days and 10 edits :) Aside from that, if I may, I'd like to ask about your username. I'm not sure if it's intended, but in Spanish it comes out to mean I will kill Val. If that's not your intent, my apologies. If it is, might I suggest requesting a change in username? gwickwiretalkedits 20:24, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Valmataré, you are invited to the Teahouse
editHi Valmataré! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Disambiguation link notification for February 26
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Academic writing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acknowledgments (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:50, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
editYou are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Kilopi (talk) 04:28, 16 March 2013 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation
editYou are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Kilopi (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2013 (UTC)Your AfC drafts
editYou seem to have a pretty good sense for what makes a good Wikipedia article. As a registered user, you don't even need to get approval to create articles in mainspace. And as I'm sure you noticed when looking at other drafts, there's a lot of authors whose work is more worthy of AfC quarantine than yours. If you have any other drafts that need to be moved, let me know. Or just move them yourself - if you think they're ready, they probably are. Kilopi (talk) 13:58, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for putting my pages in mainspace! (I'm still learning how to navigate inside Wikipedia...) Valmataro (talk) 17:18, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Dear Valmataro, I have noticed that you improved the article Editor-at-large significantly. Do you mind to have a look at Corresponding Editor? There is no such an article so far. Kind regards, Hemeier (talk) 15:58, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Valmataro. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Author editing
editHello, I'd like to explain myself regarding this edit. MOS:HEAD states that "Headings should not refer redundantly to the subject of the article", which I took to mean that if the heading "Author's writing skill" was in an article about author's editing, it would be assumed that the section would be about how writing skill relates to the subject and vice versa. That seems to be the case in other articles. If this interpretation seems wrong, or if the original heading seems more clear, I will leave it alone; if not, I'd like to ask permission to change it back. Have a nice day! Me, Myself & I (☮) (talk)
December 2016
editYour recent edit to Clarkstown High School South appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. You have added this person three times now. I pointed out in two edit summaries and in my response to your question on my talk page that the alumnus needs to have a wikiarticle showing his notability, and you restored it again. Your source showing that he is an actor is insufficient to show his notability per WP:NACTOR. Please read WP:WRITETHEARTICLEFIRST. You should also read WP:EDITWARRING. Meters (talk) 17:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Valmataro. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Valmataro. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)