User talk:VanishedUser sdu8asdasd/Archive 12

Archive 5

←

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Do I know you?

Forgive me for asking, but do I know you from somewhere, possibly tt-forums.net? Many thanks ^Tom... _{the magic...} ^TomatoTalk 13:38, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

• I was indeed a member at TT-Forums, under the name of MrMann primarily, but I also used Lukeno1 or Lukeno94 on one account there, which I lost. Which member were you? :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 13:40, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

• Ahh, thought so. Myself, 47 407. Forgive my sig! Tom the Tomato ^Talk Pending namechange to Aycliffe. 13:43, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

• I don't particularly remember you, but I haven't been active for a long time there :) It only takes the slightest of British Rail knowledge to work out where that name comes from! Why that particular Class 47? :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 13:47, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

• Something random that I came up with really, more down to the "407" part which is one of the better bus routes near to where I live. Think of it as an amalgamation of the two things I like best: Trains and buses!! Also dates back to the time when Ive been playing with MSTS. Tom the Tomato ^Talk Pending namechange to Aycliffe. 13:50, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

• I've nearly bought MSTS a few times, but I'm too cheap to pay more than a couple of quid, and the eBay auctions often go beyond that :D Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 14:25, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

• To be really honest, you aren't really missing out on alot. Railworks is where it's at at the moment, granted I don't even use that too much nowadays. Tom the Tomato ^Talk Pending namechange to Aycliffe. 15:15, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Edit: Ive found out Ive been here longer than you and you have almost 9 times more edits than I have. Turns out I'm not so prolofic after all... Lol. Tom the Tomato ^Talk Pending namechange to Aycliffe. 15:20, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

• I go through phases of doing different things :) I've been through an article writing phase, through an AfD-only phase, through an ANI-only phase... pretty much most areas. There's quite a few LNER-related locomotives that could have articles written very easily, as there's a prevalent online source with information on most of them - maybe that's something for you to look into :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:25, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

• Hi mate, do you have a link to this source? Soulds like a plan!! Tom the Tomato ^Talk Pending namechange to Aycliffe. 09:14, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

• This is the source. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 09:23, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi there luke

How are you luke? Its been a long time since I spoke to you. Dropped by for a line, what are you upto now? little kid trapped in a man's body, XD. $oHƎM❊আড্ডা 16:09, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

• I'm not doing as much editing as I was a couple of weeks ago, but I'm still doing bits and pieces :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:14, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

If you are not into edting much now then what do you do when in Wikipedia, I mean I understand that your point of interest has changed but it should have relocated to a different location now what is it, helping out new users, editing, brushing up the appearance of your user page or busy in real life?$oHƎM❊আড্ডা 09:13, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

• I wrote quite a few new articles a couple of weeks ago, so I'm just taking a little bit of a break from that :) I'll be writing articles on and off though :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 12:36, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Rollback I appreciate you getting rid of vandalism on my talk page but I actually prefer to keep all of the comments: even the cranks. I rolled you back but I definitely want to thank you for intervening. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:11, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

• Fair enough :) Your edit count is absolutely staggering, by the way. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:14, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you

It is annoying when page gets linked but then archived and I can not find it, is there an easy way? I will probably leave wikipedia anyway, I do not seem to adjust well. Thank you, MarioNovi (talk) 08:48, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

• Well, there's a link to the archive pages on the top right of the WP:AN page - it'll be in one of the most recent two archives. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 12:38, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC Reviewer permission

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC Reviewer permission. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:20, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Minorview

Oops, I meant to restore that myself; thanks for helping.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:27, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

• I wouldn't have done it if I didn't think you'd meant to :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 17:38, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Profanity

Profanity will be a breach of WP:PERSONAL. Are you saying cursing or calling someone a layer is OK? Michael Haephrati (talk) 19:58, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

• Profanity is NOT a breach of WP:NPA automatically. If I called you a fucking arsehole, then it would be. Saying "this article is shit" is not a personal attack. Also, calling someone a "layer" is fine, because it means nothing. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:26, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Article sources at AfD

Sorry. My mistake. Kindly please don't place your angry response to my mistaken edit in the sources section header.. --Michael Haephrati (talk) 21:34, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

• I'll place it wherever the hell I want. I have very limited patience right now, and you've completely broken through it. Do not post here again. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:37, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	You are receiving this barnstar for a comment you made in this edit. $oHƎM❊আড্ডা 09:45, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

• Thank you. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 09:56, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Email

Hello, VanishedUser sdu8asdasd. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

JamesBWatson (talk) 13:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you

I used the Wiki thank button but I thought I'd also add a note -- thanks for filling out the references in this diff. I really appreciate your attention to detail and doing the work that's not necessarily glamorous. Have a nice day. CaseyPenk (talk) 17:18, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

• I do everything from gnoming to writing whole new articles. It just depends on my mood :) and not a problem! Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 18:46, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Editor deja vu?

Hi.

I hope I am not bothering you but I was hoping perhaps you can help. Something about this edit and its editor has a strange air of familiarity. I strongly feel I have seen this style before. Doesn't it remind you of someone or something?

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 20:34, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

• It's no bother, but unfortunately I have no idea who that IP is, so I can't help. Sorry! :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 20:37, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Hmmm. Do you have any recollection of a recent vandalism or POV in an article or area related to DRM? Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 20:39, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

• I can remember removing a DRM-related section back in May, but that had been tagged as unsourced since 2012, and I have no idea who added it. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 20:41, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks anyway. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 20:44, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Gigablast AfD

Hi Lukeno94. Thank you for your points about personal attacks and abuse here. I've toned my previous words down a bit and apologized. Keeping in mind these arguments, do you feel that I've still left any inappropriate personal attacks or abuse anywhere? Cheers, —Unforgettableid (talk) 02:48, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

• Firstly, G11 only applies if the article is unrescuable and totally promotional, and is rarely valid for notable companies. It can be used, obviously, for notable companies, but I don't think it's really valid here. However, you cannot dismiss academic sources in the way you have, and even limited-scope sources can have big circulations - although, being unfamiliar with these ones, I can't assess if that is satisfied or not. Finally, thank you for toning down your comments, and I'm not quite sure how this guy, who, even if they are a promotional SPA, appears to be acting in genuinely good faith, has riled you so much. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:26, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Minority rights violations in Kosovo

A while ago, in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persecution of Serbs and other non-Albanians in Kosovo, you said the subject was sourced, but didn't address the issue of improper synthesis. Would you be interested in working on that subject in a less contentious scope? I noticed we don't have a human rights in Kosovo article yet, and a lot of that content sounds like it might fit there. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 10:55, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

• Sorry, but I'm not looking to stick my head in the hornet's nest that article would be, I'm afraid - and my knowledge is also quite limited on this subject. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 11:32, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the thanks

Luke, I have been watching the Premier League's limited coverage on ESPN here in the States over the last few years. Now with the extensive coverage that is being carried on NBC Sports Net on cable and on NBC, I'm very excited about the "league" and European football in general. Love the show "ESPN (Press Pass)," the guys are hilarious. I noticed on your user page that you have an interest in railroads, it reminded me that although I have an interest in it, I have not made a single edit on that subject in over 5000 edits. I have a bunch of old atlases from the heyday of the railroads but they have been misplaced in my house. One from the World War I era I have not seen in twenty years, I believe a friend of my brother may have lifted it from the house. So thinking about railroads makes me think of that atlas and how I wish I had it in my hands at this very moment. Freddiem (talk) 14:30, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

• Although a huge proportion of railway-related articles have been written (a proportion of which is only rivalled by a few WikiProjects) there are still a few left, particularly in the pre-1920s periods. I've written a couple on locomotives myself, and rewritten many others, but it would be great if you could find your atlases and improve the existing articles, or write new ones! I'd be more than happy to lend a hand :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 14:34, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
  • If I ever find the atlases I will definitely consider helping out on articles. BTW, which is your favorite Premier League club? Freddiem (talk) 17:22, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

• My fave Premier League club? Norwich City, simply because Chris Hughton manages them, and Nathan Redmond plays for them. As the names may indicate, I'm a Birmingham City fan. What about you? :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 17:26, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

• Everton is my number one (Fellaini definitely wanted to leave as evidenced by the last match as he stood three feet from the goal motionless as the ball passed by. They got rid of an obviously unhappy player, they got the money they were looking for from Man U and by the end of the day they obtained some pretty good players added to the club. All in all a good day to close the transfer window. I also like Arsenal, I get a big kick out of Arsene Wenger. Following Arsenal is like following my favourite baseball club the New York Mets. Both never spend any of the huge amounts of money they have and both wind up giving away their best players for next to nothing. The only thing different is that Arsenal finishes much higher in the table than the Mets do, year in and year out.Freddiem (talk) 00:50, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

• At Birmingham, we also know the meaning of "giving away their best players for next to nothing" - it happens regularly. I'm still shocked that no one has pinched Chris Burke. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:58, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Glen Johnson ..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDFNEEY86_A&feature=c4-overview&list=UUbkwbJJ0oljrQ5BN21SIXgg

Glen Johnson appears after 1:10 ... Clearly states PFC goalkeeping coach. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.164.117.79 (talk) 15:54, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

• That's progress, for certain, but could you provide a link from the club's website or something that says he is? YouTube isn't a reliable source. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:05, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

That is from the club's official youtube channel ? http://www.youtube.com/pfctvonline

Here is link from Springfield Demize ... http://www.demizesoccer.com/pdl/staff/index_E.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.164.117.79 (talk) 16:10, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

• Even official YouTube channels don't count as reliable sources, I'm afraid. The Springfield Demize source is good, but it states that he is still coaching for them. I'll instate that edit, with the information that he is coaching the Springfield Demize, unless you can provide a Pume FC source, or an Indian media source. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:56, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Stockport County F.C

I reference that was there needed to be kept as it confirmed ALAN LORD'S head of Development role at the club - the second reference I then put up was the announcement that he was caretaker manager. I had to revert your edit and save before putting the new reference in. The two reference are correct . I have done nothing wrong I'm basically the main person who edits Stockport County's pages as I'm a fan of the team so I know what I putting on the pages and what is necessary part of the articles. wna247 (talk) 16:17, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

• You reverted me, used a source that was already present in the article that directly contradicted the IP's edit, and then had the arrogance to mouth off in the edit summary. And the references still contradict each other. And you need to sign your posts with four tildes. You violated WP:V with your immediate blind revert of me, particularly as what I did was correct in the first place; checked an unsourced edit, found that it appeared to be factually incorrect, and reverted it. It also sounds like you need to read WP:OWN. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:21, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

• Look the article is correct now. The person does have 2 roles at the club and both are referenced. CAN we leave it there? I was just trying to make the article look right, I wasn't trying to mouth off or anything I just wanted it to be correct which it now is. .wna247 (talk) 16:28, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Too much

You removed In Ictu's comment along with that of the sock NE Ent 14:30, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

• Oops, sorry. Fixing :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 14:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Informal helpdesk

Hey man, long time no see. I needed someone to function as an informal helpdesk and thought of you. I didn't want to throw this on to a noticeboard immediately, so where do you think would be the best place to put out a general request for feedback on an article I am working on by myself? Don't worry, this isn't a subtle request for you to volunteer your own time, as I might need to know a centralized place for editing assitance requests in the future as well. MezzoMezzo (talk) 10:05, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

• I can certainly give you my tuppence-ha'penny's worth :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 10:07, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Well, it's about Al-Khalil ibn Ahmad al-Farahidi. I've done a whole lot of work on that during the past month and I noticed that compared to other bios on Wikipedia, the lead is a bit heavy with inline citations. I doubt anyone will challenge the statements there, but it just seemed like a natural place for them (plus, many of those sources are cited again but with other pages further down on the article). WP:LEADCITE doesn't seem to give a clear picture on how much citation is acceptable. I've literally spent hours working on this thing, so I'm hoping that either the lead stays as-is or we just shift the citations down into the body of the artlcle. I would hate for them to simply be deleted after all this work. MezzoMezzo (talk) 09:32, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

• Cites in the lead are fine; having four or five cites for one bit seems excessive, and I doubt that'll be needed. I'd shift the cites elsewhere in the article, if at all possible. You forgot to cite the sentence "In the modern era, the book has been printed by Maktabah Al Hilal, having been reviewed by Dr. Mahdi al Makhzūmi and Dr. Ibrāhim Al Samirā'ì in eight volumes." which I believe does need one. Most of the cites look good, but this is far from my area of expertise (as I'm sure you know!) "In his old age, the son of Habib ibn al-Muhallab and reigning governor of the Muhallabids offered al-Farahidi a pension and requested that the latter tutor the former's son." seems a little clunky, although I couldn't necessarily write it better myself. I'm rather tired at the moment, so I'll probably take another look at it again tomorrow :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 11:13, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Harry Styles

Please see: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 September 11#Harry Styles

Cheers, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:13, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Sunbeam Tiger info

Luke,

Your sources are incorrect.

Just because it is in print does not make it correct.

Even the following books have some errors, but they have more correct information.

I would suggest you read the following:

TIGER the making of a sports car by Mike Taylor.

Also, The BOOK of NORMAN by Norman Miller.

I can provide information to support my points.

Let me know were you want to start.

Spmdr (talk) 03:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

• I think User:Eric Corbett's response summed things up nicely. You have NO idea of how much work went into this being made as accurate as possible, but I do, I saw it happen. Your sources disagree with the majority of the ones we found, and some of the things you changed to utterly inaccurate figures. This article is a "Featured Article", which means it is about as accurate and well-written as they get. Not only did you introduce factual inaccuracies based on YOUR incorrect sources, you also messed up some of the formatting, and you decreased the quality of the prose. I strongly suggest you refrain from reverting again, because that WILL be vandalism. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:43, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Driver Nationalities

Hi, I noticed you have done some edits at various points on the 2013_British_Touring_Car_Championship_season page.

I have been criticised in the past for using "home nation" flags for drivers and have been told they should be British.

I was wondering why this page is any different and who decides on what is allowed or not.

Not having a pop - I am genuinely asking a question.

Thanks.

• I understand your concern, and I think the reason is because this is a national-level championship, and the British flags would be too generic. That said, it's not a standard procedure for most series, so I suggest you open a thread at WP:MOTORSPORT's talk page, and see what the reason is. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 17:26, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Languages the WMF people speak

Erik Möller probably speaks German.—Kww(talk) 22:51, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

• Fair point; and that may even be why the German wiki got preferential treatment... :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

iphone touchid hacked

could you please elaborate a little bit why you think breaking the iphone finger sensor is spam, coming from one of the most renowned White hat (computer security) organization world wide? --ThurnerRupert (talk) 16:56, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

• Look at the way you wrote it, and try telling me that it's neutrally worded. Also, it's their own claim, and you didn't provide anything to back it up from a third-party source. AND you used a YouTube video as a reference. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:58, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

the report on the ccc homepage + the video was linked. ccc is largest european club in this domain, one of the oldest and most reputed, even organising a yearly congress with more than 4000 persons attending. allow me to rervert your edit for that reason. i'd love from wikipedia author to thoroughly research if something is plausible, cross check how often it is cited, check if they did it before before calling something spam. you might consider to abstain editing contents, if you feel that you have no time to properly translate and understand the reference or find an english source. wikipedia is international and NPOV, which includes bad and good things about a subject. --ThurnerRupert (talk) 18:53, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

• If you add an edit that looks spammy, I will remove it as spam, simple. NPOV means that you don't use the highly biased language that you do. WP:RS means that you don't use YouTube sources, and that you should select third-party sources, which this one wasn't. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 19:01, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

you are right, am sorry for this, i now copied the text from iphone 5s which properly quotes what they published, and put it into vulnerabilities. . --ThurnerRupert (talk) 12:32, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

• Not a problem. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 12:38, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

an aside

Just watched the thing on Amazon Prime. Hilarious film that belies its low budget. I am inspired to dig further. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 02:08, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

• From what I'd read, a lot of people didn't enjoy it, so I'm a little surprised! WP:ILIKEIT is a good motivation to find sources, at least. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:09, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not remove citations or information sourced through citations simply because a link to a source is on the inaccurately-named spam blacklist. Such links should not be deleted purely for being on the inaccurately-named spam blacklist. Instead, please repair or replace the link, if possible, and ensure properly sourced information is retained. Often, a live substitute link can be found, or the link should be whitelisted. Many sites that aren't spammy are on the list, like examiner.com - which is there because it's typically not considered a reliable source. Links not used as references, notes or citations are not as important, such as those listed in the "External links" or "Further reading" sections, but bad links in those sections should also be fixed if possible. Thank you. Likewise, use your head. The link you removed is to a perfectly valid source that provides multiple mirrors, including http://users.erols.com/rwservices/pens/biblio05.html Elvey (talk) 06:38, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

• If you're going to spam a template onto my talk page, then firstly, tell me what you're talking about in the first place, and secondly, actually look at why I removed the link. Cyberbot II tagged the page with a message about the blacklist; it clearly is not a valid link. Blacklisted links should be removed on sight, and claiming that they shouldn't defies the point of the blacklist, and is utterly bullshit. Make sure you actually pay attention to what you're fucking doing before templating a regular user, and doing so with such trumped-up bullshit. And I've now fixed the link, since you were too lazy to do so having reverted me (the WP:BURDEN was on you to sort it out, since I was following policy by removing blacklisted links) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:44, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Don't word, read WP:TTR. See this? The bot fucked up by saying the link was spam, so you were misled. That excuses your deletion, and yet ideally, you'd have done what you've now done - repair the link - with your first edit. I'm guessing in future, you'll be more likely to repair than delete. And I'd already suggested that the bot be disabled, and it's just been disabled. So he encyclopedia is improving. Go us. --Elvey (talk) 08:41, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

• If something gets tagged as being on the spam blacklist, I will remove it, pure and simple. Rather than get into a pointless editwar, I used the redirect this time. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:46, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

I hope you get a clue about what the expected false positive/collateral damage rate is of the current blacklist system, and reconsider your decision to edit blindly. --Elvey (talk) 21:40, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

• If a fully legal bot is doing the tagging, then I will act on what the bot says, until the time that the bot is found to be flawed and blocked/decommissioned. Also, I'm not pleased to have been referenced on the bot's talk page without being informed of it. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:02, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Question concerning an article I started...

Why nominate the article for the Exablock typeface for deletion? ~~LDEJRuff~~ 17:26, 28 September, 2013 (UTC)

• Please go to the AfD discussion for my rationale. Unfortunately, I'm tired, and haven't got time to discuss this further, and won't have until tomorrow night, or Monday, I'm afraid. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:36, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Re: Gordon Banks' appearances for Hellenic

You're right. The newspaper report claiming that Banks broke his finger on his DEBUT is wrong. But are you positive that he made 3 league appearances for Hellenic (rather than two?) I have compiled NFL line-ups from various sources. Although seasons 1963-1971 are nearly complete, there is the odd match missing.

Looking at Hellenic FC's stats for 1971, I found the following:

• May 28 v Cape Town City (home) - drew 2-2 with Tony Lupton in goal
• June 4 v Jewish Guild (home) - drew 2-2 (line-up missing)
• June 11 v Highlands Power (home) - lost 0-1 with Banks in goal
• June 19 v Germiston Callies (away) - lost 1-2 with Banks in goal until injured (replaced by Kenny Allen)

Please let me know if you have any indication whether Banks played against Jewish Guild on June 4th or not?

Cheers

85.165.90.249 (talk) 23:13, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

O.E. Jenssen, Oslo, Norway.

• I'm afraid I'm not the person to ask about this :) You should look on the talk page and check who conducted the Good Article review; they may well know. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:25, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

The Sims 4

Hello,

How do you know that The Sims 4 is coming out in March 2014, is there any references or any official proof. And is it real 100% Announcement from EA. That The Sims 4 is coming out March 2014.

Thank You - Joe Parkinson joeparkinson@live.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joe Parkinson (talk • contribs) 19:21, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

• No, but you completely botched the edit (removing some bits that were required, and leaving in other bits that were relevant to what you were removing). Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 19:58, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

OK, Apart from that how do you know when The Sims 4 is coming out, March 2014. Where's the proof/reference that The Sims 4 is coming out March 2014. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joe Parkinson (talk • contribs) 12:19, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

• I just said I didn't. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 18:35, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Merge discussion for British Racing Motors V16

An article that you have been involved in editing, British Racing Motors V16, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Spiderlounge (talk) 13:13, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

• Well, that's amusing, Spiderlounge; I posted my comment on that RM a minute before you sent this :p Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 13:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

AN reply

I agree with you, I should have been more proactive and stopping such behavior early on. As an academic scholar some of Wikipedia's processes go right against the very conventions I have been taught. Namely, when someone misrepresents, dismisses or challenges an assertion I am told to respond with the reasons why their argument is wrong and persuade others who would make similar claims to closely examine the text. If my argument is bested or I cannot appropriately address the concerns than I yield. Peer reviews and interacting is the core of academic advancement, but when you insert bad-faith and POV pushing bad things happen. On here the questions are dodged or reiterated without addressing the initial argument, sidetracking to TLDR territory. Such as copy-pasting objections to opposite POV without addressing why they are wrong; simply regurgitating the mess or finding more and more contrived ways to make objections to distract from the matter at hand. I need some mentoring to better prepare myself against such things and not get sucked into them. Like it or not, part of Lucia's behavior is because I enabled her by continuing to discuss in the belief that reason, logic or consensus building would occur. I regret my response and frustration with her because it's made such a problem from the community. I spend very little time in Anime and Manga subjects as well. So the drama is far out of proportion of anything I expected or seen before. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 18:04, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

• If you were to get mentorship, and took on board exactly what your mentor said, then it would do you a world of good, and also remove a lot of the ammunition your opposers have against you. I'm rarely here on Wikipedia any more (certainly compared to what I was doing), and am considering semi-retiring due to time constraints, but until I make any firm commitment, I'll continue my aimless wander around the place. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 19:23, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

  Do you know a place where I can get or find such a mentor? It would be for the best, and I have been taking to heart the advice that I am given, but actual mentoring is the difference between someone commenting on your actions and refinement and culture teachers at a finishing school. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:04, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

• Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area may help you. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 20:06, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks. I picked Steven Zhang to ask first, he seemed like the best to ask given my situation. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:19, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject volleyball - invitation to discussion

This is an special invitation for experienced editors to the discussion in WikiProject Volleyball about the proposal for Notability Guide for Volleyball Players. Your wise and kind participation will be highly appreciated. Osplace 20:35, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Peter Brock

Hi,

I noticed that you removed my edits on the Peter Brock page. I am new to Wikipedia, and have not edited before. I have spent much time researching Peter Brock, I do however understand that I need to reference my contributions. Most of my contributions come from books. Could you please explain to me how I can reference my contributions particularly references that are books. I also am aware that my writing is not unbiased, but that is something that will improve the more I contribute.

I would most like to contribute as I do have quite an extensive knowledge of This topic (in Australia which is where I live he is the most revered driver in history).

Thanks Sardiene — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sardiene (talk • contribs) 07:19, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

• Please read Wikipedia:Citing sources and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view carefully (preferably more than once), and try experimenting in your sandbox, so you can get the references to work without damaging an article. If you need any more help, you know where my talk page is now :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 10:07, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Very Much,

Like I said I do want to make positive contributions and I certainly feel I have lots of valuable information, on Australian Motorsport and Football (Soccer). I will have a read and try to work it out, If I need any more help I'll come to you.

Thanks

Archiving AfDs

Hello, just to let you know that you archive closed AfDs here in the Deletion archive rather than just delete them from the list of Nominations for deletion and page moves as you did here Diff. I've added the latest deleted AfDs to the archive already. Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 23:17, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

• Ah, my bad :) Thanks! Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:09, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

With compliments! Mootros (talk) 08:36, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks, what is this for? :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:40, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Request for comment

As you previously participated in related discussions you are invited to comment at the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC for AfC reviewer permission criteria. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:08, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Ford G7

Hello! Your submission of Ford G7 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —David Eppstein (talk) 01:44, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Batmobile

Jeg2357 (talk) 02:18, 23 October 2013 (UTC) Hi Luke, I'm sorry my edit seemed like advertising. I didn't mean it to sound like, or imply, advertising or for promotional purposes. I haven't built or sold a BatRod in over 10 years. I was just kinda tooting my own horn. The link I provided was just for the pictures. I have no affiliation with anybody at or with that website. Jim Jeg2357 (talk) 02:18, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

• Unfortunately, because you have built and sold BatRods, then I'm afraid you shouldn't be adding in the information. Besides, the addition was poorly sourced (please read WP:V and WP:RS; blogspot sources should not be used) and there was no evidence of the BatRod being notable in any way. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 09:18, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi

"Obvious trolling?"[1] I was just trying to end that section by expressing how ridiculous it would be if Hasteur really was correct. Sry for misunderstanding DontClickMeName _talk^{contributions} 19:00, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

• Which is pretty clearly an attempt at trolling... I disagree entirely with Hasteur's position as well, but that was just unnecessary. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 19:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Wouldn't trolling be a low level of argument? I was trying to destroy the accusation. I probably shouldn't have made a joke of it, though DontClickMeName _talk^{contributions} 22:42, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

[2] does this work then? DontClickMeName _talk^{contributions} 00:59, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

• Apart from the fact that I'm either "Luke" or "Lukeno94", yes, that's much better. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 09:40, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

It's hard to remember your number!

Thanks for your first revert, you probably kept me out of a mess. I think you have a nice integrity--even when you disagreed with Hasteur, you still knew it was plainly harmful for me to make a laugh out of his opinions on the matter (which were serious input).

You also knew not to shy off when I said "I was just trying to end that section by expressing how ridiculous it would be if Hasteur really was correct. Sry for misunderstanding" ... It was very wrong how I worded that sentence: I talked as if I fully expected you to agree with my behavior, and made it look like you couldn't possibly disapprove it unless you didn't get the sarcasm. That's terrible--I swear it wasn't conscious, but maybe my learned automatic behavior...

I did, in fact, hope you merely didn't understand my sarcasm, but it was my nasty bias that made me behave as if I fully expected the hope to be true.

Wikipedia needs more people like you... DontClickMeName _talk^{contributions} 03:58, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

• I could read it as being sarcastic, and I could read it as being serious. The main thing is you've realized that there is a time and a place for those sorts of comments - and that wasn't in that discussion. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:36, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Ford G7

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

Sorry that you had to put up with their behaviour. PantherLeapord|My talk page|My CSD log 00:53, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

• I chose to get involved, knowing the tendencies of this user; your apology is appreciated, but not necessary. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 00:55, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Hows it going?

Sohambanerjee1998 12:07, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

• Pretty busy thanks, due to University :) I see you're sort-of semi-retired, but still seem quite active? Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 13:12, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Contemplating retirement my friend thats why but its hard to leave. Sohambanerjee1998 06:39, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

South Coast football

Luke, I know your teams are Birmingham City and Norwich City, but I noticed you are from the South / South West. So it had me thinking about Southampton's sudden rise to the upper echelon of the table. It made me wonder what is happening with their would be rivals Portsmouth, and I noticed they are down in League Two. It was not too long ago that I remember them being in the Premier League, have they been relegated nearly every year since they dropped from the top flight? Also, are you a fan of thoroughbred racing and if so did you watch the Breeders' Cup? The Europeans did fairly well. Freddiem (talk) 08:10, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

• The Portsmouth story is a depressing one. The most obvious comparison is Rangers - except that Portsmouth weren't liquidated. Portsmouth went into administration two or three times due to a combination of slightly crooked owners, overspending, and chronic mismanagement. They were relegated from the Premier League at the end of the 2009–10 season, and then suffered back-to-back relegations in 2011–12 and last season - coming very close to being liquidated in the latter season, when basically their entire senior squad had to leave. They seem to have stabilized in League Two for now, but quite low in that league. As for horse racing, I'm afraid I have next-to-no interest, or knowledge, in that sport. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 11:37, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Quack quack bang....

I wonder if you'd like to update your NAC[3], just for the record, to indicate that the OP was indeed blocked[4] as a sock of that long-time stirrer and malign stalker DeFacto? But if you'd rather leave it, that's fine too - I'm glad to see it closed and done. Thanks. NebY (talk) 17:09, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

• I'm not seeing the need to; DeFacto's attention seeking has already succeeded this time around, sadly; no need to keep feeding it. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 17:27, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I misread it as not saying the OP was actually blocked. Very silly of me. I was coming back here to revert myself - but you answered first. You're quite right. NebY (talk) 17:36, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

• I'm completely sick of these long-term sockmasters disrupting everything, at least their accounts usually don't last long. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 17:39, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

• Quite. Ah well, at least my watch-list looks better now without ANI. NebY (talk) 11:44, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

• I've never watchlisted AN/ANI; I wander around there when I feel like it. I should probably get back to writing articles at some point soon... I have time, sort-of, just not the willpower to do so right now. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 11:47, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Re: 2013–14 West Ham United F.C. season Rounds

Ok, Thanks for informing me. After having a look I can see I was wrong. I'm still fairly inexperienced with Wiki. I will always try to update their position after they have finished their game. I'm always updating this page and enjoy doing it too as West Ham are my passion. Cheers. Pegley1990 Talk 5 November 2013 13:43 —Preceding undated comment added 13:43, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

• Hello Pegley, are you sure you've sent this to the right person? I've never edited the page that you're referring to, and I think you may have meant to send this to QED237; in fact, I'm not even sure how you ended up at my talk page! :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 14:56, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Mistaken Gross

I had to revert the addition of this NDTV source because it did not clearly explain Thuppakki's overall collections (it said "reportedly fetched over Rs 80 crore at the box-office"), without saying whether domestic or international. The majority of other sources in the article mention that the film domestically earned 180 crore (Times Of India and EROS International), and because the NDTV source didn't seem to fit anywhere in the article, I preferred to go with what the other sources say. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 16:45, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

• What you should've done is a partial reversion - which I probably should've done as well. The reason for this is using the "crore" is more helpful than using million/billion, since it seems that this is the appropriate thing for Indian films (and is generally used in the sources as well.) This also has the added bonus of keeping things in the same units. This is what made the edit, on the face of it, appear to be valid. As a result, I've changed things to crore :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:57, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

question about which revert(s) you wanted to see discussion about

You entered phase two of WP:BRD with this diff.[5]

Did you actually mean to revert the second edit, which got rid of the weasel wording, or did you only object to the footnote-expansion, and twinkle-limitations caused the double-revert? I'll go add the footnote-expansion to the talkpage to see if anybody objects to the wording, but I'd like to stick the weasel-fix back into mainspace if you don't mind. Thanks for improving wikipedia.

p.s. Does twinkle not leave template-stuff on user-talkpages like some of the other tools do? I'd appreciate a note if you revert my edits in the future, if the wiki-tool permits it. I just caught this one by luck. Danke. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 00:02, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

• I can't see any particular weasel words in there, and you've added a lot of things in there that are clearly your own opinion - such as the bit on the notability of a venue. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:40, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

I am working on it

I understand. I am working on it: integrating original reference links into the article's reference fields. Bammesk (talk) 19:02, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

• Removing old talk posts shouldn't ever be done, unless they're pure spam and/or otherwise inappropriate for Wikipedia. The majority of things on there that you removed were neither your posts, nor were inappropriate. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 19:07, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
  • "Removing other talk posts" Agreed. I was not sure about that. Thanks for clarifying. It should be safe now to remove the list of original dead references from the talk page. Bammesk (talk) 19:21, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Gedion Zelalem AFC submission

Thank you for your work on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gedion Zelalem.

Would you be willing to do a copyright-infringement review of it, and rewrite any verbatim-quotes or close paraphrases that you find? I would strongly discourage any administrator from un-salting Gedion Zelalem until 1) the copyright review is done by someone (I'll eventually do it if nobody else does) and 2) there is a consensus by non-involved editors (i.e. not you, and not me) on WT:WikiProject Football that this person's notability as a football (soccer) player won't be called into question or he clearly meets WP:NFOOTY based on game-play alone (his 17th birthday - late January 2014 - at the earliest). The second issue likely won't be decided for a few days yet, so there is plenty of time to take care of the copyright review. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:14, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

• Given that 90% of the text in there was written by me, I can guarantee that copyright infringement will not be a problem with it. He clearly fails WP:NFOOTY as he is still a youth player, and is yet to make a fully professional appearance (this may, however, be literally a couple of months away at most); however, I'm pretty sure he meets WP:GNG, which is more important. Also, note that his age is actually completely irrelevant; he doesn't have to be 17 to become notable, he simply has to play a professional game for Arsenal (which will probably come in either a short Premier League run-out, or an FA Cup round, at a guess.) There are a lot more sources out there than I used in the article as well. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 20:56, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

My Username

I do agree that my username is to I work for Disney like, how do I get my username changed? Toon Disney HD (talk) 22:25, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

• Firstly, thank you for taking the notification in the right way; I'd hoped you'd respond like this! Toon Disney HD, if you visit Wikipedia:Changing username, you can request to have your username changed to something that makes you look less like a corporate stooge, or something similar. I suggest you read WP:USERNAME prior to selecting your new name, but if you generally avoid corporation names (unless it's something like "Disney fan" or similar), and anything that is obviously inappropriate, you should be A-OK. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 22:27, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

I actually found it very confusing; Toon Disney HD (talk) 22:45, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

• Which bit did you find confusing? :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 22:48, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Basically everything. Toon Disney HD (talk) 16:29, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

All-terrain Vehicle

Mind telling me why you decided to revert my work? I cited everything, no need to when it's clearly adding to it. Regardless, I've got a separate page waiting now anyways. ~Slashfan7964

• WP:UNDUE, due to the excess amount of detail, is relevant here. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:06, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Virsliga's non-fully-pro status

Section 5.2 of the document sourced by LatvianFootball lists a series of documents to be submitted by club to the LFF. The list includes work contracts of professional players and amateur contracts of amateur players. Given that the league rules specifically provide for the registration of amateur players, it's pretty clear that the League is not fully pro. Google translate provides a reasonable English translation. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:23, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

• Good job I reverted it! It was as much a skepticism as anything else, and I prefer to see either rock-solid sources, or a clear consensus, for any such addition(s). Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 23:48, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
• Those are the regulations set out by the Latvian Football Federation that clearly divide players into those who have professional contracts and those who have amateur contracts. Therefore, I put the league in the not fully professional category. You can even check this info on the LFF website, where there is info about the contract of every registered player. As an example, I give you the entry of FK Liepājas Metalurgs, where there are professional and amateur players in the squad mixed. http://www.lff.lv/lv/virsliga/klubi/liepajasmetalurgs/ LatvianFootball (talk) 00:09, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

I could use a review

Hi.

You have more experience than me in topics like Talk:Comparison of S.M.A.R.T. tools § Inclusion criteria. Do you mind pitching in? I could use a fresh opinion or a third course of action.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 11:33, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

• I'm afraid I wouldn't be of any help in this discussion, as my knowledge is very minimal, and my fiery nature would only make things worse! Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 13:30, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks anyway. It seems I was not fully aware of the true fiery nature of the discussion to which I am inviting you. For that, I apologize. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 07:53, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 16 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the List of Bolton Wanderers F.C. players page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 02:20, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

For your help with my German stalker. I wish I spoke enough German to be able to explain to him how the C20 and C120 names apply to the Nissan Vanette, which is the misunderstanding underlying all of his ill will. Sadly, and judging by the way he's responded to other German editors in the past I don't think his kind of crazy can be chalked up to language differences. Anyhow, thanks again for the help!  Mr.choppers | ✎  06:38, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

• Unfortunately, my German extends to guten tag and scheisse, so I can't help anyway. It's very weird; some of the edits (at least, the basic edit, leaving the edit warring aside) at least appear to be misinformed-but-in-good-faith; and yet some of them are pure spam and/or addition of promotional bullshit. However, the rather pathetic vandalism of your userpage, and the attempt there of taking over my talk page... this is why I don't like IPs being able to edit, especially those on mobile networks. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 11:23, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, he has a lot of energy and is very prolific - he just completely lacks the ability to collaborate. No conversation, totally refuses to listen, no willingness to accept that he has misunderstood something, just revert revert revert. Not a good editor overall. I feel like you do about IPs editing; but maybe in a few years every last IP will have been rangeblocked for vandalism and then we will be able to focus on writing stuff again... Mr.choppers | ✎  23:35, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

• Problem is, those rangeblocks can also take out good editors (or good new editors, which in some ways is even worse), all because one pratt decides that it's "cool" to disrupt Wikipedia. And I can't see how we'll ever get rangeblocks on mobile providers, since so many use them; despite the fact that they're the easiest things for vandals to use. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:41, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Pierre Webó

Hi there LUKE, AL "here",

lost battle apparently, this article (and many many more) is lost in the wilderness because the are so many beasts out there (in other words the vandals and the idiots that won't leave us to work in peace!) that this can't be stemmed.

In this case, this "user" is saying "My team does not have bad fans, only the rest, we are great!". In a similar case (would not be the least surprised if the same person was the culprit, with another IP), referenced stuff regarding Bruma (footballer born 1994)'s debut in the UEFA Champions League was summarily removed why? Because Galatasaray (another Turkish team, as in Webó's case) lost 1-6, and the fans are having none of that! Pityful...

Happy editing, happier weekend, from Portugal --AL (talk) 00:43, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

• I can see where they're coming from with Pierre Webó, but it seems to be a fairly clear consensus to keep that passage of text in that article, hence why I revert the removal on sight. However, there's literally no excuse whatsoever for any removals of sourced content on the Bruma article. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:20, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Re: RFPP

Whoops not sure why I did that. I think I may have been looking at the wrong tab accidentally. I protected it for a month. Sorry about that. Thingg^⊕⊗ 17:12, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

• No problem, Thingg; you did so many at once that it's not surprising this happened! :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 17:18, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Next matchday scenarios

Hi. Thank you for participating in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Next matchday scenarios. I have proposed a conclusion that addresses the concerns of many participants regarding reliable sources. Would appreciate a comment. Ivan Volodin (talk) 10:52, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Tigers

Hi, I have removed the internationally capped players list as the information is already shown in the current squad section with internationally capped players in bold. I have added a note to that effect after the squad list. noq (talk) 14:18, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

• Now that it has been explained by you, it is fine; the other user, however, was refusing to give a reason for doing so. It also looks like they have a history of removing things without ever explaining themselves. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:36, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Australia national association football team". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 01:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

List of current Formula One Grands Prix

Hi Lukeno94. FYI, I have started a discussion about List of current Formula One Grands Prix at the Formula One WikiProject. You are welcome to participate in the discussion. Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 03:11, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

I've nominated the article for deletion. You are welcome to comment at the deletion discussion. DH85868993 (talk) 02:21, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Greaves Motorsport

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Greaves Motorsport you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb (talk) 17:32, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Marijuana

• Hi Luke, I understand that you're frustrated, but this kind of comment should be avoided in the future. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

• You're right, it should be. I think "frustrated" should be replaced by "outraged by the way I'm being misrepresented", however. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:18, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. No worries. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:44, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Hakulin

Yeah I am that guy from there :D. You can tell if you look what I edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hakulin (talk • contribs) 12:41, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

• As I thought, Dan. :p I'm sure you can work out who I am ;) Incidentally, when you're using a Wikipedia talk page, please sign your posts at the end using four tildes (~~~~), and you can create section headers by putting two equals signs around whatever you want the heading to say. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 12:44, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikiproject Brands

This project is tagged on a vast number of irrelevant articles (Hydropneumatic suspension?). AIUI, it was no more than a 'bot run gone bad. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:57, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

• I wonder if there is an automated way to remove them, Andy? Otherwise it's easier to just leave them there than to remove them one-by-one (and relatively harmless). :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 23:04, 5 December 2013 (UTC)