Vanished User 13579
March 2012
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:14, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Vanished User 13579 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have not violated any policies that I am aware of. No evidence that I am abusing multiple accounts has been provided. Therefore I can only conclude that this block was made in error and should be undone. Vanished User 13579 (talk) 23:28, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Users who have exercised account renaming as part of their RTV may not continue to edit - they have, after all, left Wikipedia for good (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 23:43, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Oh really? Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:32, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- Please state your point clearly. --Vanished User 13579 (talk) 23:35, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Vanished User 13579 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Sorry, won't do. Have I renamed this account? When? Please show me the log. Otherwise I reiterate my previous request rationale: I have not violated any policies that I am aware of. No evidence that I am abusing multiple accounts has been provided. Therefore I can only conclude that this block was made in error and should be undone. Vanished User 13579 (talk) 23:48, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
At best you'll be unblocked and immediately reblocked as a misleading user name, and a disruptive one at that.--jpgordon::==( o ) 00:04, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- It looks to me like this account was created with this name, and has not been renamed from a previous account name. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:03, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- You are correct. --Vanished User 13579 (talk) 00:10, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Question for Jpgordan: Can you point me to the applicable policy that forbids having a user name claiming to be a vanished user? If you can substantiate that I will not continue to request an unblock. As for being disruptive, how so? --Vanished User 13579 (talk) 00:10, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- Subtlety hinting at your previous username, in addition to a clear knowledge of Wikipedia, is pretty strong evidence. As such, I've blocked you from editing your talk page. Please wait out your block, or if you are who I suspect you are, please stop editing and sockpuppeting if you'd like to even have a chance at the standard offer. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:12, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
You asked Jpgordan above Can you point me to the applicable policy that forbids having a user name claiming to be a vanished user? . Here you go:
- There are four kinds of usernames that are specifically disallowed... Misleading usernames imply relevant, misleading things about the contributor. - Wikipedia:Username policy
And just to make sure there's no further confusion on this subject, I've gone ahead and specifically added claiming that you are a returning user to the list of prohibited usernames. Raul654 (talk) 20:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC)