im not sure if you are aware of this but your edit to William Wasz is considered vandalism please stop or you could be blocked possibly Indefinitly from Wikipedia please use the Sandbox for future tests Saturn star 20:14, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

July 2007

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to William Wasz, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DearPrudence 20:14, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Reply


Why is the truth vandalism? Did you get proof of anything when you allowed this to shown on your website? You have no proof, and this situation has caused tremendous grief for the children he left behind, who are struggling with such lies. The person responsible is an OJ supporter, trying to make money off of this story. This is only hearsay. I can prove concretely that most of the statements in the article could not possibly have happened. Where do you get off lettin g lies be written? How could you impose such authority? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vasteph (talkcontribs)

I'm not sure if this comment was addressed to me, but I'll reply to it anyway. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, and therefore we can only present what facts are known. Opinions have no place in an encyclopaedia. See WP:FORUM and WP:SOAP for more information. --DearPrudence 02:56, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply