Sadaputa Dasa (Richard L. Thompson)

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sadaputa Dasa (Richard L. Thompson), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.afn.org/~bvi/people.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:27, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Vedicsciences, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Abecedare (talk) 11:54, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

March 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article History of astronomy, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Abecedare (talk) 11:55, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Heart. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. We can't use our own articles as sources. This would be a circular reference and should be avoided. Dawnseeker2000 19:12, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Loka. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Uncle Dick (talk) 00:43, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Richard L. Thompson. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Dougweller (talk) 06:41, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tatastha

edit
 

The article Tatastha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Borderline gibberish.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 16:56, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Airavata Das

edit

I have nominated Airavata Das, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airavata Das (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Wikidas© 01:08, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Richard L. Thompson for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard L. Thompson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard L. Thompson (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 19:19, 3 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Bhuu for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhuu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhuu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MJLTalk 00:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply