Vega61

RETIRED

Block

Latest comment: 14 years ago14 comments8 people in discussion

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vega61 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hi I have only one account here, it's on my computer. I don't any other accounts, It appears that I have been linked to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yattum}. I have no connection to anyone or person, mention in that investigation. Through cross reference I have got one drawing, of many which I have converted to SVG, belonging to ANigg, If thats a crime doing work on another troubled account, than I'm sorry. I have spent countless hours on several articles, I think my contribution record should speak for itself. I have followed the wiki laws to the letter, fixed any copyright inaccuracies, and have work through any problems with all editors. I hope that this unfortunate error, can be fixed As soon as possible. Vega61 (talk) 05:14, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

The CheckUser result was a clear 'confirmed', not 'possible', 'likely', 'probable'. As such the evidence would appear to show that you have used multiple accounts - and as Magog the Ogre points out, your editing style is similar. As such, I feel that the block was correctly applied to this account and so I am declining this unblock request -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 09:11, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How do you explain the positive checkuser result, which indicates that you are editing from the same IP address as the Yattum as well as the same IP address to a very similarly named account? --Jayron32 06:04, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

What's more, your writing style is similar, and this coincidentally came just an hour or so after the decline on User talk:Viper 265. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:14, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vega61 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not as computer savvy as you guys, but I can't see how it's possible to for someone else to use my IP address, unless it was hacked, & I don't even know if that possible. Again If someone can show me, where I've committed, some major violations, other than alleged sock puppets, then I would agree. This is unfortunate snice I have in good faith contributed to Wikipedia, spent many hours uploading good lic "my own work" images. When I say my own work it means I spent hours working these articles. Does someone with bad intentions, do that? Finally if my user name is considered corrupt due to my IP Address, can I create a new user account, cause Vega61 is blocked, or is that considered being a sockpuppet? How can I get back to editing, if possible? Thank You Vega61 (talk) 14:58, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I would so like to help you here, and I will offer some suggestions, but your obstinacy makes it impossible for me to unblock now. "I can't see how it's possible to for someone else to use my IP address, unless it was hacked" ... right, that's what we're saying is that you used and abused the other accounts. "Does someone with bad intentions, do that?" Yes; the banned users list includes many once-productive editors. "How can I get back to editing, if possible?" State which account you will use and use only in the future, consent to the other ones being blocked permanently, and disclose any other alternative accounts of which we were not aware. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:14, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vega61 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok well thank you for you help talk, I guess I should be banned then. It would have been nice to continue editing and, now I must pay for my actions. If anyone out there has any suggestions to get me back, would appreciate it deepy Vega61 (talk) 15:23, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Well, I guess we're all in agreement, then. Smashville^talk 15:36, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vega61 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So how do I get back to editing? can I create another, User name, without breaking the sock puppet rule? If my suppose it accounts have been blocked then I wouldn't have multiply accounts? right? Vega61 (talk) 15:48, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 18:51, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vega61 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Absolutely understood, I would never want to do anything, to be disruptive, but only good faith edits. If someone looks at my contributions , you'll see as Vega61 I at no time did engaged in any misuse of my account. No swaying of votes, or try to persuade another editor for an article consensus. All my work has been to contribute in good faith. If unblocked I Guarantee you won't hear a peep out of me, except good edits. Now come someone, lift the iron drape off me. Vega61 (talk) 21:24, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Sorry, you seem confused. Your usernames were not blocked -- you, the human being who used the account User:Yattum, are banned from Wikipedia, and you are not welcome under any username. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:30, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vega61 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not him the human or user name, I would love to have someone show me my IP address under User:Yattum, there's no way, checkuser log is wrong! Vega61 (talk) 21:53, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Sorry, we don't do that; for perfectly understandable reasons. You've got this big "Retired" hed now; I think that means you'll be OK with me revoking your access to this talk page in addition to declining this as you just don't seem to get this. — Daniel Case (talk) 01:52, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

File:400px-Roundel of the Lebanese Air Force svg.svg listed for deletion

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:400px-Roundel of the Lebanese Air Force svg.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:05, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Dem, Congolese Air Force Roundel.svg listed for deletion

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dem, Congolese Air Force Roundel.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:38, 19 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:600px-Afghan Army Rpoundel.svg listed for deletion

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:600px-Afghan Army Rpoundel.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 11:36, 21 August 2011 (UTC)Reply