Welcome!

edit
 
Hello, Venkat Chirumamilla!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

 Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, - SUN EYE 1 17:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


February 2022

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Meena (actress) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:38, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Anty meena fans removing genuine data

edit

Some one anty meena fans editing her genuine info. I believe google wiki is to provide all the important and genuine info about celebrities. Specially meena is a great achiver we want to provide all the important info about her. But some one wantedly removing that and degrading meena mam. Please help me Venkat Chirumamilla (talk) 19:09, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

That would be me, I believe. I reverted because the edits sometimes left the text garbled as here, and in general, I felt the edit was a bit of overkill. Her superstar status and accomplishments were adequately illustrated in the article already, I felt. I've left your contributions with a short revision [1], to improve grammar, and have the text match what the source says. signed, Willondon (talk) 19:32, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply