Victor foli
Your submission at Articles for creation: Siyaram's (October 16)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siyaram's and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! Victor foli,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:10, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Siyaram's has been accepted
editThe article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
FeatherPluma (talk) 04:24, 31 January 2015 (UTC)Hi, Victor Foli. This is a reply to your message on my talk page, as a courtesy to you, but can we keep the conversation there, please? Yes, sorry about the revert. I would like to emphasize that I appreciate the work you have contributed to the article. The Draft:Siyaram's page is one of many subjected to a "mass revert" back to Draft status. None of your content is lost. I am very sorry your article is caught in the middle of this "mass revert". Several excellent articles have already been returned to mainspace as time and re-analysis permits. There are references from all sorts of reasonable sources in the Siyaram's proposal, including Economic Times (Indiatimes), thehindubusinessline, and Deccan Herald. In my opinion, and you need to understand that it's my personal opinion at this point and not consensus at this point on this article, based on the guidelines as written (which are supposed to drive Wikipedia community decisions and facilitate consensus) the revert to Draft status may have been incorrect. Unfortunately, I recommend that we now need to patiently work through the system. First, may I extend an apology to you - I think I understand how you probably feel. Second, I will work on Siyaram's as soon as I can. I think the best way to get this article advanced is for me (or another helpful editor) to go through it line by line, and make sure it's as good quality as we can both get it. There are also resources at Teahouse and a Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron - you could ask for help from either resource. I do thank you in hopeful anticipation of your understanding and patience. I am not promising anything, but let's see what can be done. Realistically, this may take a day or two. As a reminder, let's use my talk page as the venue for further interaction. Regards. FeatherPluma (talk) 14:40, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Siyaram Silk Mills, Ltd has a new comment
editYour submission at Articles for creation: Siyaram Silk Mills has been accepted
editThe article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Huon (talk) 00:34, 2 February 2015 (UTC)- Hi, Victor foli. Your article has been returned to mainspace. In its present form, there is now a trail of support for it from numerous high volume editors. I hope you are comfortable with the trimmed content. If you feel that re-introducing the brand names is culturally appropriate in the pan-Indian setting, could you let me know? The consensus seemed to be that it wasn't neutral to have a section on the brand lines. I'm not sure I agree with that consensus, but the Wikipedia process plays out step by step. There may be ways of phrasing content inoffensively for those who cringe at "branding". I'd also appreciate you letting me know if you ARE happy with it as it now stands. Also, may I suggest you try your hand at another article? Again, sorry about the to and fro. Warm regards. FeatherPluma (talk) 01:26, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Siyaram Silk Mills
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Siyaram Silk Mills, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:20, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of ARQ (Investment engine)
editHello Victor foli,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged ARQ (Investment engine) for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.