Your submission at Articles for creation: Siyaram's (October 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:10, 16 October 2014 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Victor foli, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:10, 16 October 2014 (UTC)Reply


Your submission at Articles for creation: Siyaram's has been accepted

edit
 
Siyaram's, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FeatherPluma (talk) 04:24, 31 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Victor Foli. This is a reply to your message on my talk page, as a courtesy to you, but can we keep the conversation there, please? Yes, sorry about the revert. I would like to emphasize that I appreciate the work you have contributed to the article. The Draft:Siyaram's page is one of many subjected to a "mass revert" back to Draft status. None of your content is lost. I am very sorry your article is caught in the middle of this "mass revert". Several excellent articles have already been returned to mainspace as time and re-analysis permits. There are references from all sorts of reasonable sources in the Siyaram's proposal, including Economic Times (Indiatimes), thehindubusinessline, and Deccan Herald. In my opinion, and you need to understand that it's my personal opinion at this point and not consensus at this point on this article, based on the guidelines as written (which are supposed to drive Wikipedia community decisions and facilitate consensus) the revert to Draft status may have been incorrect. Unfortunately, I recommend that we now need to patiently work through the system. First, may I extend an apology to you - I think I understand how you probably feel. Second, I will work on Siyaram's as soon as I can. I think the best way to get this article advanced is for me (or another helpful editor) to go through it line by line, and make sure it's as good quality as we can both get it. There are also resources at Teahouse and a Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron - you could ask for help from either resource. I do thank you in hopeful anticipation of your understanding and patience. I am not promising anything, but let's see what can be done. Realistically, this may take a day or two. As a reminder, let's use my talk page as the venue for further interaction. Regards. FeatherPluma (talk) 14:40, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Siyaram Silk Mills, Ltd has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Siyaram Silk Mills, Ltd. Thanks! --L235 (talk) As a courtesy, please ping me when replying. 23:41, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siyaram Silk Mills has been accepted

edit
 
Siyaram Silk Mills, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Huon (talk) 00:34, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Hi, Victor foli. Your article has been returned to mainspace. In its present form, there is now a trail of support for it from numerous high volume editors. I hope you are comfortable with the trimmed content. If you feel that re-introducing the brand names is culturally appropriate in the pan-Indian setting, could you let me know? The consensus seemed to be that it wasn't neutral to have a section on the brand lines. I'm not sure I agree with that consensus, but the Wikipedia process plays out step by step. There may be ways of phrasing content inoffensively for those who cringe at "branding". I'd also appreciate you letting me know if you ARE happy with it as it now stands. Also, may I suggest you try your hand at another article? Again, sorry about the to and fro. Warm regards. FeatherPluma (talk) 01:26, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Siyaram Silk Mills

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Siyaram Silk Mills, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:20, 16 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of ARQ (Investment engine)

edit

Hello Victor foli,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged ARQ (Investment engine) for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Famousdog (c) 12:08, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply