VineFynn

Welcome

Hello, VineFynn, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents / Department directory

• The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
• The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

• Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
• Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

• Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
• Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

• Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

VineFynn, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:05, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

I've been on wikipedia for nearly a decade. VineFynn (talk) 11:23, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Sorry I went off half-cocked in my response to you in that Australian Unemployed Workers' Union article 'edit history'

I know my response to you was out of order, you were acting in good faith and I made very wrong assumptions about that. I've posted an apology to you in that section of the "Talk" area there, plus a minor edit on the article which comes with an edit history 'note' apologising to you there also. Unfortunately there has been a lot of problematic activity on that article since late August that I've noticed in the last few weeks I've been watching there, but I can certainly see your intentions were not that way at all. Would go back and change that note on my initial edit in the 'history' if I could, but I don't think WP lets us do this :( JayBee00 (talk) 04:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the apology, I appreciate it a lot. For my part, I hadn't read the disputes on the talk page well enough to realise they also included the organisation's status as a union. Obviously the revert was appropriate given the controversy.VineFynn (talk) 05:40, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for thanking me for my edit

Thanks!

If you would like to contribute to the article "critique of political economy", I'd love to help you get started.

Have a good day.

Pauloroboto (talk) 11:28, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

I already contribute to it on occasion. You have a nice day also :) VineFynn (talk) 12:21, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Economics talk

Hello VineFynn. Curious about your edit summary restoring a SOAPBOX message here. A sockpuppet's post would be even more bright-line deleted than one called unconstructive or vandalism, which can be a matter of judgment. In the context of the massive off-wiki canvassing and tempest in a teapot at Recession, I see no basis to restore that comment. I may archive it shortly. SPECIFICO talk 13:18, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi mate, my reasoning was like I mentioned in the edit summary- it didn't seem like vandalism, which is what your edit summary said was your reason for deleting it. Maybe unconstructive, but I wouldn't ordinarily delete somebody's first talk page entry simply for stating a strongly-held belief of fact. I'd give them a little tutorial about wiki policy or whatever. You can do whatever you want though.

Comment about sockpuppetry was just because the user has no prior edits- was just brainstorming that they might be an alt; a sockpuppet isn't an automatic delete, there are legitimate privacy reasons not to declare one. Who knows? I don't really care either way tbh. CheersVineFynn (talk) 09:22, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)