Vintageceilingfans
Vintageceilingfans (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I just joined wikipedia and I now understand It is possible to be blocked so I'll never do that again.
Decline reason:
Blatant disruptive sock -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:14, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Vintageceilingfans (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What do you mean I'm a sock? I'm a person.
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon::==( o ) 20:44, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BLOCK XCTOME ON YOUTUBE -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:19, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Vintageceilingfans, you are accused of operating multiple accounts in a manner not proscribed in the policies. Hasteur (talk) 20:33, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Your block has been raised at the Administrators' Noticeboard
editHello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. I realise that you cannot reply there (or here atm), but another editor has raised your blocking as being possibly incorrect. I'm minded to at least allow you access to this talk page, but will wait to see what other editors/admins have to say first. Mjroots (talk) 20:12, 20 May 2011 (UTC)