Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, VioletBrew. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 16:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Moving articles

edit

Please don't move articles from the scientific name to the vernacular name without first seeking consensus from other editors. Also we do not use fully capitalized vernacular names on the English Wikipedia (see MOS:LIFE), so even if a move were justified, it could not be to something like "Trout Lily Miner Bee"; it would have to be to "Trout lily miner bee". If you want to start a discussion on moving this particular article, do so at Talk:Andrena erythronii. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:52, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your buzzing contributions, :-). Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉]) 14:59, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:National general status working group in Canada has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:National general status working group in Canada. Thanks! Perryprog (talk) 20:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: National general status working group in Canada (February 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EDG 543 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 23:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, VioletBrew! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 23:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:National general status working group in Canada has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:National general status working group in Canada. Thanks! Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:59, 24 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: National general status working group in Canada (July 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Clarityfiend (talk) 20:44, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:National general status working group in Canada

edit

  Hello, VioletBrew. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:National general status working group in Canada, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:04, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply