Re:Vandalism

edit

Please, when you remove vandalism from WP pages please also revert the content which has been lost: otherwise the articles get shorter and shorter. See for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Public_domain_image_resources&diff=prev&oldid=93280085 the spammer had deleted a whole section which you didn't revert but the fact the article looks "fixed means no one else checked.

However, please carry on helping! --BozMo talk 12:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Nonsense

edit

Ok. Thanks for the advice. --MarshalOctopus 03:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Re: Saddam's Execution

edit

And to you! I haven't participated in this kind of rapidly changing page before, but it's quite exciting. Great to see the article slowly come together with the help of the community. --Hopex 05:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Re: Saddam

edit

Thanks for you help keeping vandals and such at bay, what a crazy page!! :) Viperphantom 05:48, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, it has been crazy. Just doing my part to help.  :-) Thanks for doing yours, too! --Jhortman 05:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

NPWatcher approval

edit

You've been approved to use NPWatcher. Please give me any feature requests or bugs. I'm also happy to help if you have any problems running the program, or any questions :). Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if I've made a new release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Finally, enjoy! Martinp23 21:06, 5 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Removal of speedy tag on Qwert.net

edit

Hi, was just wondering why the speedy tag was removed from the Qwert.net article when it does not meet the Wikipedia:Notability (web) guidelines, especially as the article was created by the website author. §ĉҺɑʀκs 01:52, 7 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup tag

edit

I see that you put a cleanup tag on Julia's Laws of Gravity in the vicinity of Julia Dawson. I'm sorry, but did you even LOOK at it? It's utter nonsense: it doesn't need clean-up, it needs imediate execution. --Calton | Talk 15:34, 7 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Öhlins

edit

Um, Öhlins is quite a well-known suspension company in many different fields of racing. It is not nonsense, I am not new to Wikipedia, and my username is Wadems with an "S" at the end (You posted a blurb on user Wadem talk page). ♫ Bitch and Complain Sooner ♫ 17:17, 7 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Techmaster P.E.B.

edit

I'll take off the tag and just leave a note in the talk page to add sources. Thanks for sending me back to it. :--Nwbpwnr 03:51, 9 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism- I'm not sure if this is the right place for me to talk to you, however I feel that I have been wrongly blamed for vandalising the Illegal immigration topic. I didn't do anything like that. All I did was change the article and provide cited references where the article was not cited. When others reverted it without telling me why, I changed it back. I did not change the article anymore when someone decided to talk to me about it. --Flashstar 03:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

That AOL guy you commented on...

edit

No contributions for quite some time, and then an attack page created... think it could be a cracked password? User:Logical2uTalk 22:45, 16 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Rating the ToK

edit

Hi. I'm trying to get members of the Psychology Project to get together and rate the both the quality and importance of the Tree of Knowledge System. Hope you're interested. Have a great day! EPM 19:26, 17 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Request for peer review

edit

The article Clinical psychology has just been listed for peer review. You are invited to lend your editing eyes to see if it needs any modifications, great or small, before it is submitted to the Featured Article review. Then head on over to the peer review page and add your comments, if you are so inspired. Thank you!! Psykhosis 20:35, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wow that was a quick as lightening!! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 17:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes I've been to the ends of the earth today - I have been working on Tibetan and Cambodian new articles!!! More Tibetan articles to come in a few minutes so watch out!! Keep up the new paging ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 17:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Phew! That me done for today - I think I've covered a lot today!! Is the bust of Kornél Sámuel appropriate for wikipedia do you think? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 20:01, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Amazingly there are still thousands of places even in France and Germany that still don't have an article. Roth an der Our has pictures which makes a major difference - but that region in particular has taken several weeks already!!! -adding a few every couple of days!! Hopefully each place will not only have an article but will be long and detailed with pictures eventually!! Hey - I'll let you get to it but nice meeting you. All the best ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 20:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

entry for Jet City Improv

edit

Hi, you flagged my entry for Jet City Improv as reading like an advertisement, but I'm a little confused. I'm trying to follow the format for the verified wikipedia entry for Unexpected Productions, another local improv company--I mimicked their sentence structure almost exactly and tried to stay as neutral as possible. Can you tell me what I should do to change the entry? I want to play by the rules here.  :)

Thanks!

fusion mechanism question

edit

Thanks for tagging my page fusion mechanism with insufficient context. I realized you were right and added some more content. I need your opinion: do you think it now has enough context? I just want someone elses opinion before I remove the insufficient context tag you put up. Dancanm 19:50, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cell Fusion

edit

Cell fusion is now up and running. Feel free to help if you've got anything. Dancanm 19:52, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

WP:CVU status

edit

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

canon article

edit

it is all well and good that the article didnt seem to have any basis, i was just wondering why you told me. i, to my knowledge, have never seen nor edited said article. if you could clarify, would really appreciate it. thanks. Ono 15:37, 24 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Filmmaking Announcement

edit

A PROPOSED PROJECT MERGER with WikiProject Films is under consideration. All opinions and questions are strongly encouraged! Girolamo Savonarola 01:34, 9 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Handango's blatant advertisement

edit

Hi - you had rightly marked the Handango article as blatant advertisement, but someone removed your mark. So I added it again, but without reverting as some people had added legit info in the mean time. Best --Calmansi 17:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Films coordinator elections

edit

The WikiProject Films coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 09:49, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter

edit

The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:38, 2 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Task force roll call notice

edit

Hello! Your username is listed on the Filmmaking task force participants list, but your user contributions show no activity within the past 18 months. Consequently, we've taken your name off of the list. If you still consider yourself an active editor of the task force, we encourage you to please add your name back to the Active Members list. Thanks! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 22:23, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Junction punch

edit
 

The article Junction punch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable cocktail. reference is a dead link to a student newspaper.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 12:44, 17 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, SteviethemanDelivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply