Virtuality1995
Welcome
edit
|
Hurricane Danny
editPlease read WP:NOTABILITY. If the storm were to cause impacts in the future, then it might be notable, but at the current time, there is no reason why it deserves an article more than the other storms. I'm not a deletionist, but Wikipedia has certain standards. There are times when articles are needed, but now is not one of them. If you have any questions, leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dustin (talk) 21:04, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi
editHi puffle it`s me Douglas form HHW — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fun Cake (talk • contribs) 21:25, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
HI
editNugget | |
QOA Fun Cake (talk) 20:19, 22 August 2015 (UTC) |
August 2015
editHello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Easter egg (interaction design) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:29, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Recent edit to 2015 Atlantic hurricane season
editHey there Virtuality1995! Thanks for helping keep the 2015 AHS page updated but your recent edit regarding retirement breached Wikipedia's policy on original research and predicting the future. While the damage caused by the storm could very well warrant its retirement, we have no official source indicating such and the meeting during which retirements are determined is not until April 2016. Regards, Cyclonebiskit (talk) 08:53, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Surface Pro 4, Nov 2015.png
editThanks for uploading File:Surface Pro 4, Nov 2015.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 02:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Welcome back to HHW
editAlan welcome back to HHW IDk why`s yoy left but i`m glad to see you back It`s a Cake of Fun! 18:19, 25 June 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fun Cake (talk • contribs)
Speedy deletion nomination of Cavaliers-Warriors rivalry
editHello Virtuality1995,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cavaliers-Warriors rivalry for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 21:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)