Vishgohel

Seeking for lifting the BAN on my account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vishgohel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Admins, I am seeking for lifting the BAN from my account & promise to contribute as per the guidelines. Eagerly waiting for the response.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲_水 15:01, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request - Admitting mistakes & want to contribute more as per the Guidelines (promise)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vishgohel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Accepting the usage of my account as SOCKPUPPETS

• Understand what you did and why you have been blocked - Yes, I have done things which were not aligned as per guidelines. I was wrong & want to make it right.
  
  

From Yunshui

• To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, - Now, this block is not necessary as I have read lots of articles & will do a fresh start
  
  
• the block is no longer necessary because you

1. understand what you have been blocked for - Admitting it & promise to be constructive with obeying Wikipedia Guidelines
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and - Read lots of articles & rules. This will not happen in future for sure
3. will make useful contributions instead - Definitely, will make sure for positive & useful contributions with Table Coding, Citations & Entertainment Domain to start with.
   
   

Apologize again & looking to work towards more contributions (Constructive & Positive).

Question - Can I create Zivame Company Page through Articles for Creation (AFC) process? Vishgohel (talk) 07:17, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This appeal contains very little substance. Please explain in your own words what you did wrong, and what you will edit about if unblocked. In particular, why do you want to create an article about Zivame? MER-C 11:19, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.