User talk:Vision Thing/Archive2

Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party has been accepted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Nazism. For the Mediation Committee, ^demon[omg plz] This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to open new mediation cases. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

This message delivered: 20:16, 5 April 2007 (UTC).

Request for Mediation

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediator accepting this case is a non-MedCom member, and your input is once again required; please sign the relevant section on the case page, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate with this editor. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree again, so please check as soon as possible. Once all the editors have re-signed, Mediation will be able to begin. Kindest regards, anthony[review] 10:05, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Types of socialism

Vision Thing- You edited Types of socialism to read:

Some individualist anarchists such as Benjamin Tucker, and Pierre-Joseph Proudhon referred to their philosophy as socialism. However, the meaning of the term "socialism" has changed over time, and his philosophy "cannot be considered collectivist in any politically meaningful sense."

Who is the he in the "his"? Is it Proudhon or Tucker? BobFromBrockley 14:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Article on Matrixism: a Religion Based on the Writings of Aldous Huxley

There is an article on a entheogenic new religious movement called Matrixism being created at User:Xoloz/Matrixism. There are numerous sources for this article yet it has because contentious because it deals with the subject of entheogens. Thought you might like to look at it and perhaps contribute. 206.124.144.3 05:22, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Firstbornisdead.jpg

Hello, Vision Thing. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Firstbornisdead.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Vision Thing. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:02, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Iron Maiden - Live After Death.jpg

Hello, Vision Thing. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Iron Maiden - Live After Death.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Vision Thing. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 09:28, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Anarcho-syndicalism

Hello, on the anarcho-syndicalism article you have reverted one of my edits without comment. As I stated in the edit summary, the sentence currently uses weasel words rather than attributing a particular source to the claim. Unfortunately this makes it an editorial not suitable for an encyclopedic work. If you could provide the actual quote from the source it would solve the problem, as we could determine if it is Ulrike or someone else, rather than simply a claim "being made". Thanks Etcetc 23:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Anarcho-capitalism

Hello again. You've also restored a source to this article, "Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought", with the edit summary, "restoring valid sources". As I wrote in my edit summary, the article in question does not source the claim provided, the claim being that it refers to anarcho-capitalism as a form of individualist anarchism. As I specified, the article actually claims that individualist anarchism died off and was "reborn" as anarcho-capitalism. This would make anarcho-capitalism a descendant of individualist anarchism, not an ideology that falls under the category of individualist anarchism.

I have taken the time to look through these sources to ensure that they really back up the claims made in the text, this is a long process and many of the sources are quite acceptable. However, some are not. If, in the future, you wish to restore sources you think I've improperly removed I would appreciate specific references to each individual source, as I have given myself. Thanks. Etcetc 23:37, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Individualist anarchism

Hello again. You have removed all the sources I provided to balance the claim that anarcho-capitalism is a form of individualist anarchism. I understand that many anarcho-capitalists and those who sympathize with them would like the article to portray anarcho-capitalism as a form of individualist anarchism, however, it is important for the sake of npov that we present both sides of this issue. The article currently includes an entire list of sources that as supposed to have refer to anarcho-capitalism as a form of individualist anarchism (in fact some of these sources do, and some do not), as such it is incumbent on us to provide a list of sources that would deny this claim so that the text can bear out the undeniable fact that the assertion is a controversial one. If you want to talk about this, please feel free to message me anytime, but please do not remove accurate sources that are relevant to the text. Thanks. Etcetc 23:56, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Individuaualist anarchism

Excuse me, but you removed 4 sources from this article with the claim that they are "unreliable". I would like to point out that all of these sources are published, one from a reputable historian, and all are properly cited. Your subjective views on what is and is not reliable are not a proper justification for removing proper sources. I would further like to point out that many of the sources you left, which from all appearances do not offend you in the same manner, are in fact completely inappropriate for wikipedia, including links to webpages without and citation information, self-published essays in uploaded in pdf format, and sources whose text does not in fact justify the claims being made in the article. Please cease this kind of disruptive behavior. Thanks. Etcetc 00:02, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Nazism

WP:RfM/Nazism; The Request for Mediation in progress with the Mediation Committee which lists you as a party is now progressing, and all parties are invited to contribute. The case is currently at the final stage of Mediation, at which parties are invited to post "Suggested Edits" which they wish to implement into one of the involved articles, as well as to support, oppose or propose amendments to existing suggestions. Further instructions are given at the Mediation location. Kindest regards, Anthøny 19:11, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Reverting

I have responded to your request for enforcement of user restrictions. That editor has been blocked per the restriction. However, I would also encourage you to discuss significant reversions and article changes on the associated article talk page. While we should be bold, we should also avoid causing conflicts and becoming disruptive for other editors. Always try to reach an agreeable solution with other editors and try to be nice even when others aren't. If I can help out in any way, let me know. Cheers! Vassyana 20:49, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Editwarring

You are also editwarring, and misusing edit summaries. Do not use edit summaries for anything else that to explain the edit. Please follow dispute resolution if you cannot find common ground with fellow editors. I have placed a similar notice in other editors' talk pages that are editwarring with you. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 00:05, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Arbitration

Hello. I've started an arbitration case against you due to your consistent edit warring across multiple articles. Your input is requested. :) -- infinity0 19:41, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Block

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy, by edit warring on Anarchism, despite previous warnings. You are blocked for 24 hours. Please discuss instead of continue to revert, treat other editors politely and respect consensus. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. Vassyana 14:43, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vision Thing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I think that this 24h block is not appropriate because I was blocked for making two partial reverts on Anarchism which undid the controversial changes. Also, I'm currently tired from dealing with infinity0 and I didn't thought to edit anarchism article today anymore, so this block will be strictly punitive and not preventative. -- Vision Thing -- 15:11, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Block has already expired. If you remain blocked, please follow the instruction on how to remove an autoblock. - auburnpilot talk 14:49, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Vision Thing

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Vision Thing. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Vision Thing/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Vision Thing/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Cbrown1023 talk 20:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Vision Thing dismissed

The Arbitration Committee has passed a motion to dismiss the Arbitration case entitled "Vision Thing". This has been passed with the rationale that there is a lack of usable evidence. For the arbitration committe, Cbrown1023 talk 00:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)