Welcome

edit

Deletions from Work permit

edit

(Changes here)

  Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. --CliffC 21:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


RE:Work permit

edit

Actually, you are a little misguided here. You cannot just delete legitimate content from pages. You need to discuss these changes on the articles' talk page, before doing it. - Rjd0060 02:11, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I noticed that you started a discussion. However, I see no reason to remove this information. There is no reason you cannot add that other info about Italy and Germany, however why do you want to delete everything? If you respond, please reply to the correct section of my talk page. - Rjd0060 02:24, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
If you are saying that the information isn't properly sourced, then that is no reason to delete it right away. Feel free to add {{fact}} to the sentences that need proper sourcing, but please don't delete the information. - Rjd0060 02:33, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
That would be the best way to go. Sorry about all the problems you are having. I see that you are new to Wikipedia and hope this doesn't discourage you to continue to edit, as I am sure you are trying to better the article. - Rjd0060 02:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

Please stop adding the link http://www.diyexpat.com/visa%20guide/greencards.html to wikipedia. Per our policy on external links, this site should not be linked to as, as it's primary purpose is to promote the sale of a book. Pastordavid (talk) 16:32, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Maybe you have a look at the copyright page Dave. If you take out a footnote because you don't like it but leave the text, it's a violation of the copyright policy of Wikipedia. (Unless you're employed by Wikipedia, then it's "their" policy, not yours.) You hate the referred to site because of its commercial orientation (oooo horror!), but obviously don't read enough German to see the commercial aspect of the lawyer's company which is also there. At least be consistent,

Furthermore, the contraction "it's" is short for "it is". You want to say "its". VivaBelgicaBE 16:44, 7 December 2007 (UTC)Reply