Vivekumraoglendenning
File permission problem with File:Amla Ruia Water Mother.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Amla Ruia Water Mother.jpg, which you've attributed to http://groundreportindia.org/monthly/columns/2017/03/the-groundwater-revolution-economy-self-sustainability-woman-empowerment-solar-energy-and-education/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mz7 (talk) 01:25, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
The article Amla Ruia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails to receive intellectually independent coverage across the two sources (BBC and NDTV-piece) that were available in my search and seemed semi-descent. The latter is solely written in terms of awarding her a non-notable award.
The Better India source over this article ain't a RS. IIMLN awards are miles away from being notable. The Hindu leadership award is equally non-notable stuff. Ref-4 is the NDTV piece that I described above. Homepage ofher own trust isn't a RS. The Times Foundation is an associate of Ruia and that explains the puff piece that they have penned; well ain't RS.
That's it.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ∯WBGconverse 14:18, 9 February 2019 (UTC)