Vmathews102

Hi how are you? :) Djenkins10 (talk) 19:51, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi Vicky. Instead of linking the full URL like you did with your articles, you can just type two brackets around each since they are articles within Wikipedia. Click edit on your talk page to see how I linked your articles below:

Clinical behavior analysis <--- this one could use some work if you know enough and have access to enough resources for it. I personally do not know much about it. But seeing as how SU is starting an ABA program, it wouldn't be a bad idea for an SU student to put in some work here.

Hindsight bias <--- could definitely use some work. On the talk page there are several places people have pointed out that need improvement.

Child development stages <--- this one's too broad.

Behavior management <--- this one could be beefed up.

Comfort object <--- this one could be expanded with more psychology-related references, such as writings by Winnicott.

ScottPKingPhD (talk) 14:30, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Peer Review

I like detailed information on Hindsight Bias you added. I find Hindsight Bias to be very interesting, so reading this was quite enjoyable! You are adding really good information about the topic that was not there before. I found very little grammar mistakes and your information is coming from really good secondary sources. Keep up the good work! Beg4myskillz (talk) 15:52, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Beg4myskillzBeg4myskillz (talk) 15:52, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

The additions to the article were good. They were objective with no opinion added to them, and your grammar seemed to be correct throughout the changes. The information was good and fairly detailed, but there is a possibility of some more elaboration, especially with examples. I think your information was well written and seemed to flow as well. Overall, it was a good article. JBelkin24 (talk) 16:46, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Jacob Belkin

I found the article to be very interesting. I learned a lot about the topic and you did a good job of adding relevant information. Ilusion of control by proxy section was very well written and surprised that it wasn't there before you started editing the article. I agree that maybe there should have a been a little more examples to back your information but otherwise minimal grammer mistakes and great job of not using any opinions. Like everyone else said you did a really good job!~~IZRozin22 — Preceding unsigned comment added by IZRozin22 (talk • contribs) 17:48, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks guys for the feedback and overall I'm glad you enjoyed reading my edits! Thanks for all the help! Also...for IZRozin22, I'm not exactly sure what you are talking about when it comes to illusino of control by proxy section? I think you might have commented on the wrong article? Vmathews102 (talk) 01:49, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your input regarding the section I added on the article. I'm glad that the section I added was interesting to read. Yea, there has been a lot of editing involved, but I would have to say that one lady, who is a psychologist, did help me out a lot on going about this project. Wmiguel08 (talk) 17:16, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Help us improve the Wikipedia Education Program

Hi Vmathews102! As a student editor on Wikipedia, you have a lot of valuable experience about what it's like to edit as a part of a classroom assignment. In order to help other students like you enjoy editing while contributing positively to Wikipedia, it's extremely helpful to hear from real student editors about their challenges, successes, and support needs. Please take a few minutes to answer these questions by clicking below. (Note that the responses are posted to a public wiki page.) Thanks!

Delivered on behalf of User:Sage Ross (WMF), 16:51, 10 April 2013 (UTC)