Concerning your removal of my edit on Pan European Game Information

edit

Hello.

You’ve recently reverted my edit on Pan European Game Information with the reasoning that the icons are not official ones and that the font is incorrect. There is a Labelling and Advertising Guidebook from PEGI dated April 2011 which states (p.10) that “the descriptors with text must be used [..] whenever the PEGI content descriptors are being used in a monolingual context (box, website, advertisement, trailer, etc.)”. English Wikipedia seems to be fitting that description of a monolingual context (even though it’s not being the reviewed material itself), so in terms of officially correct\allowed representations I think the annotated icons are not invalid. Please correct my reasoning if it is wrong.

Regarding the incorrect font used for the annotations, could you please specify which font was used in the original icons, so the icons can be corrected? I’ve tried googling it but there didn’t seem to be any official memo about it, and all I managed to find was the abovementioned guideline (which discusses only fonts for the word “PROVISIONAL”). DaemonDice (talk) 12:42, 29 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

PEGI

edit

  Hello, Volapükian. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
  • instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you.