Hello Voltdye, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Voltdye, good luck, and have fun.Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 10:52, 17 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

February 2018

edit

  Your addition to Anne Churchland has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. – Joe (talk) 17:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Loksmythe (talk) 17:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:18, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute has been accepted

edit
 
Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Noah!💬 19:40, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Minor edits

edit

  Hi Voltdye! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 14:55, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for letting me know! I thought it was a more subjective thing. From now on I will keep it in mind. (Not sure how to @ you in this response. Hopefully you will see it?)