Wikipedia

User talk:W.carter/Archive 20

< User talk:W.carter
Latest comment: 5 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic The Signpost: 30 September 2019
Archive 15←Archive 18Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21Archive 22Archive 23

Take a look

Latest comment: 6 years ago12 comments2 people in discussion

..at the article about Kenneth Gärdestad if you find time for it. I will nominate it for DYK in a few days time and any help is appreciated. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 23:09, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

He sadly died today.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:59, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
I have created an article about Fallet Kevin. I am planning to nominate it for DYK in a few days time. Any help is appreciated. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 16:24, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi BabbaQ. It's really nice that you like what I do on articles you ask me for help with, but you don't have to thank me all the time for my edits. One "thanks" per article is quite enough.   We are after all working colleagues, only doing what's best for the articles and I'll help out when I can and have the time. cart-Talk 20:05, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Thank you, thank you, thank you ;) No, but seriously it is only as appreciation. Good work on the article. Regards.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:13, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Haha!   Just do me a favor and drop the "Regards". There is an editor at Commons who only use it (and use it often!) when they say something negative, so to me that word is starting to sound like a "four-letter curse". I'll check the article again tomorrow or so to see if it needs some polishing. cart-Talk 20:26, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Ooooh, I surely will not use that word again :) Lol. Yes, please do that. Appreciate it!--BabbaQ (talk) 20:50, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
The photo was a nice touch. :) --BabbaQ (talk) 12:49, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
I took the liberty to re-write the entire article about Lill-Babs. She desevered a better article than she had. Take a look.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:28, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Great job   BabbaQ! Yes, she certainly deserves a really good article. I don't have much time for editing today or tomorrow, but I'll see what I can do a bit later. I guess the article will get some helping hands from the RD too. cart-Talk 09:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

The article about Netta that I created is appearing in the ITN section today. As Israel won ESC. Yeah: :)BabbaQ (talk) 16:32, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Great job BabbaQ, Grattis! :) With the number of views that ITN usually generates for an article, there will be a lot of help with the article. cart-Talk 16:41, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Userbox

Latest comment: 6 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Hi W.carter. I have a "need" (well more like a nice idea) for a music-themed userbox and wonder if you'd be interested in helping out? The learning curve looks a bit steep for this bear of very little brain. Doug butler (talk) 23:38, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi Doug butler, I'm all for helping out bears if I can. :) What kind of userbox did you have in mind? Text and links, colors, image? Just give me the info/thoughts in plain language and I'll see if I can make it into a box. cart-Talk 09:28, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
For as long as I can remember I've been an aficionado of Shine On You Crazy Diamond by Pink Floyd, which to me outshines (sorry) by far anything they did subsequently. My idea of a graphic is an inversion of their famous Dark Side of the Moon prism logo with a diamond replacing the prism. I've had a go at a graphic 145x145 pixels. Doesn't look too bad as a first attempt, could send to you as an attachment. Many userboxes have sledgehammer captions: I was thinking of just "Shine On". How does that sound? Doug butler (talk) 09:47, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Doug butler, the biggest problem is that you can't use the cover images in any way in userboxes. If you click on the images you will see that they are Non-free media. That means they can ONLY be used in the article about them. If I used such a picture in a userbox it would be deleted. That is why people try to create pictures themselves or use alternative free images. If you have an image you have made yourself that doesn't violate any copyrights, you could upload it on Commons and post a link to it here. If the image needs some TLC, I can do that for you once it's upload. The text sounds good, where would you like to link it? What colors should the userbox and text have? I can work on this later tonight, right now I'm at work (Sweden time). cart-Talk 10:16, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Hope this image differs enough from the prism logo to be acceptable. Not sure I'm happy with the incoming beam being dead horizontal, but the physics of it is OK. Could add some "sparkle" perhaps. Haven't thought about colors and fonts. You choose. Do you know the song BTW? Very sad story behind it. Doug butler (talk) 12:23, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Another idea: behind the diamond and the beams, the letters SYD in dark grey reaching top to bottom, so they're barely discernible, a tall fat font using about half the black area. Feel free to reject the idea. Doug butler (talk) 12:41, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Ok, here we go Doug. I made two new pictures after your directions: File:Refracting diamond 1 - shine.jpg and File:Refracting diamond 1 - SYD.jpg. I put links to them on your original drawing. The first suggestion for the userbox is now ready and it can be tweaked as much as you like. The code for the box is on this page: User:W.carter/Userbox SYD and you find the code for the transclusion here: User:W.carter/userboxes. If you open the file at User:W.carter/Userbox SYD, you can edit and play with it yourself if you like ( I have left some tips in the code for you ). Once you now have the code in place for this, I'm sure you can figure out how to change the image or the colors. The codes for web colors are here: Web colors. The size of the text is set to 14 in line | info-s = {{{info-s|14}}}, you can change that too if you like. Or you could have a think about it and tell me to fix it for you. cart-Talk 17:29, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

On second thoughts the SYD version does look a bit hagiographic; I'm really happy with the "shine", a very classy addition, and I can't think of any way to improve it. Thank you for your excellent work. Doug butler (talk) 22:23, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Fallet Kevin

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

On 22 May 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fallet Kevin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 20 years after confessing to the murder of a four-year-old boy, two brothers had all suspicions against them dismissed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fallet Kevin. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Fallet Kevin), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:41, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Socken and sogne

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi W.carter

I have written a very quick description of the Danish sogn in Parish (Denmark). My knowledge extends only to Denmark (and to some extent to Norway before 1814), but I think it is fair to day that things developed differently on the two sides of the Øresund.

I don't know if it happened generally in Sweden, but as I understand it, a large number of churches were demolished in Skåne in the late 19th century. If this was a general development in Sweden, it might explain why the socken in Sweden lost importance faster than the sogne in Denmark. In Denmark, the closure of churches is very rare and almost exclusively a city phenomonon. Besides, the civil registration issue was discussed in 1920, during the reunification process with South Jutland, when Copenhagen considered changing the Danish civil registration system to the municipalities (i.e. the Prussian system). However, such a decision was never taken, which is why South Jutland still uses a different authority for civil registration than the rest of Denmark. It was one of a very small number of laws that were not harmonized during the reunification in 1920.

Best regards. Valentinian T / C 20:12, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi Valentinian, thanks for your reply. In Sweden the situation is a bit more complicated since sockens and parishes are not the same thing. Parish is for church administration and socken is for civil administration, that is why it was important to get the socken page up to speed. Not using the socken had nothing to do with the demolition of churches, sockens were simply replaced by other more modern ways of sorting the country first with stad (town) and later with kommuner (municipalities). There are some basic facts about this in Swedish municipal reforms of 1862. As of now all the sockens have become districts, also something else than parishes. In some rural parts of the country, people still keep the old way of referring to areas and it is frequently used by archeologists since it is a convenient way of talking about where finds are made. The borders of parishes have of course also undergone some change with time, but that is totally separate from sockens. I will read your article more thoroughly later and see if I can incorporate facts from it in socken. All the best, cart-Talk 20:38, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:51, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Thank you for the kitten.

Frogger48 (talk) 20:44, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This is Dr Sunil Kumar Verma from India. I see that you have contributed significantly on my biography article "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunil_Kumar_Verma" which is a good article category article as per the talk page of the article.

I noticed that something wired is going on on my article. Some one is adding humiliating content by false names/account which is created by someone just to add something only on my article. It is probably an attempt to defame me by someone who is affected by my professional activities. May I request you to please look into this matter and ensure that nothing humiliating is added on my article. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.6.108.43 (talk) 20:31, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello Dr Verma, I'm sorry to say this kind of vandalism happens from time to time. Unfortunately, I'm home with the flu at the moment, so not really up for battling vandals and I might do this the wrong way. I see that the matter has come to the attention of administrator Shyamal and editor Shellwood and I humbly ask one of them to revert the vandalism and perhaps put the article under a temporary protection. Best, cart-Talk 22:20, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Really sorry to hear about your health. I pray for your quick recovery.

While you communicate with editors, please also inform them to refer to the article published in outlook (https://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/questions-in-a-petri-dish/295745). You can see that while the reporter of outlook contacted the Nobel committee, the Secretary-General of the Nobel Assembly for Physiology or Medicine, Professor Urban Lendahl made a statement that since there was no official representation from India, this matter was not pursued (see towards end of the article).

Most statements written in my bio by vandaler are wrong and unsupported. Specially the concluding one, which is humiliating too - "This matter did not receive any more attention once it was realized that artemisinin and artemisin are entirely different chemicals. However, Verma's claim that artemisinin is a variant of artemisin, caused him significant embarrassment in the scientific community". Fact is as written in outlook article cited - and also stated by Professor Urban Lendahl that the matter did not receive further attention since it was not pursued by India as a country and there was no official representation. May I request the author to either support his statements either by references or delete them.

I am also leaving for a meeting in German Embassy in Delhi. Hope the senior editors will see the matter and take appropriate action or do editing as appropriate. Regards. 27.6.108.43 (talk) 22:55, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Request to document 2015 Nobel prize controversy created by Dr Verma

Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Dear Carter,

Dr Verma's created a big controversy in 2015 regarding that year’s Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine by claiming the major chemical (artemisinin, for which the prize was awarded), was a minor modification of another chemical (artemisin) which was already and described by Indian Scientists a century ago. This claim was published by leading new papers of India, some of which also raised questions of impartial behaviour of the Nobel Committee - one of the newspaper (Outlook India) is provided by Dr Verma above. If you go through this article, you will find that it has clearly quoted Dr Verma's statements on the matter and provide adequate evidence.

I strongly feel that this significant matter should be added to Dr Verma's Wikipedia page as it is an important part of this scientific endeavours. If this is not appropriate for whatever reason, I propose that a separate Wikipedia page describing the whole controversy should be created as there is enough verified/published references in this matter.

Dr Verma's statement is true that this ID was created just for this edit as I don't want to reveal my identity for various reasons. I look forward to hear from you for the next line of action so this controversy could be documented in Wikipedia.

--Amrev (talk) 21:49, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi Amrev, if there was a controversy, it could be included in the article but in a neutral and encyclopedic way. Any such "hot" material should not be included by any of the parties involved in the controversy in any way, in this case it also applies to Dr Verma. This rule: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, exist to ensure that the text is properly checked for facts and written in a neutral way. If you are involved in it, it is almost impossible for you to remain totally impartial.
The problem here is that the creator of this article is no longer active on Wikipedia and I have no real knowledge about the subject. My area of expertise is language, article form, encyclopedic style and layout. It was my job to refine these aspects of the article in the work to get it to good article, that is why my name appears so often in the later history of the article.
I suggest you try to get hold of an experienced editor who is familiar with the subject to help you with a draft of the text you want to add. You can ask at The Teahouse, a place where new editors can ask for advice and get help with things like this. Additionally, if you look at the top of your screen, you will find a link to your own private "Sandbox". That is the area where you can prepare text before adding it to an article. If you and your co-writer want me to help you fix up the style of the text when you are done, you are welcome ask. --cart-Talk 22:22, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello Amrev (talk) 03:07, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Apologies if the text is posted multiple times. Could you please check/edit the following...

Title: 2015 Controversy (Not sure what should be the title)

In 2015, Verma actively criticised the basis of this years Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine award to Tu Youyou for the discovery of the chemical artemisinin and her work on malaria (news website references). Artemisinin is an active compound present in a medicinal plant called Artemisia annua that is used for curing malaria. In his social media post (Referenced either directly to the facebook post or the newspapers which mention the social media post], Verma claimed artemisinin was a variant of artemisin that was already known to Indian scientific community (again news website references). To substantiate his claims, Verma provided a snapshot of an article from a book, "Indian Medicinal Plants" published in 1918 by Lieutenant Colonel K. R. Kirtikar and Major B. D. Basu (reference to the book and/or snapshots of the pages and reference to the news web sites). The book clearly described the use of "artemisin" in India to cure intermittent and remittent fever (the common phrase for used for malarial fever till 1880).

The controversy resulting from Verma's claims was published in many news papers (newspaper referenced to the articles). According to Outlook India's article, "Questions In A Petri Dish: The Nobel for medicine has gone to a Chinese researcher. Has the work of Indian scientists been overlooked" (reference), Verma stated “If a minor variant of a well-known compound extracted from a plant found around the world can be given the Nobel, poorer countries will be the losers, as scientists from technologically advanced societies can always find plants with similar chemical compounds elsewhere and extract the ingredient from them. Communities with traditional cures will lose out”.

The controversy abruptly ended when in contrast to Verma's claims, it was realised that artemisinin is not a minor variant of artemisin and the two are entirely different chemicals (a figure with chemical strctures and their International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry names will be added and referenced. Please also note that artemisinin already has an article in wikipedia while artemisin will be linked to US's National Library of Medicine).

Amrev (talk) 03:17, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Amrev: Like I said before, I'm not the right editor to help you with this since I don't know anything about the subject. Right now, I have the flu and I'm in no shape to edit any articles. Please ask at the The Teahouse (just click on the link) for an editor to help you. All I can see from this is that the text is far too long and detailed, it is unreferenced, not encyclopedic in style and sounds more like some personal vendetta. When you wrote about this incident on Talk:Nobel Prize controversies, you called it "the most silly controversy", so perhaps it is not significant enough to even be mentioned in the article. Pleas check with someone who has better knowledge about this. cart-Talk 06:40, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Did a complete re-write of the article about Leif Axmyr. Take a look when time permits. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 00:12, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:11, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello, W.carter. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:48, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy New Year, W.carter!

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
 
Happy New Year!

W.carter,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Ceannlann gorm (talk) 22:52, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Hellvi

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi there, thanks for creating the Hellvi page. Hope to see it at DYK soon! In case you're interested, there's a paper here that explores the mask a bit. There are also brief discussions of the possible symbolism of eye modification at Sutton Hoo helmet#Dragon motifs and Gevninge helmet fragment#Discovery. --Usernameunique (talk) 20:01, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello Usernameunique, that is very kind of you. :) I'm not going to take the article to DYK tough. I'm just seeing if I can finish up my very long project of making articles (or putting into context) all the geographical features on Gotland. Almost there. Since I know the archeologists who made the 2011 real excavation, it was nice to be able to write something about the mask. I'm not sure the earlier Odin hypothesis about the mask is relevant anymore sínce they found the missing eye during the 2011 excavation and the mask is no longer one-eyed. I remember how exited they were over the find. There are photos in the refs of both eyes [1] [2]. I might add some more to that section. Cheers, cart-Talk 20:23, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Yes, looks like you're making good progress. Looking forward to seeing it completed, and to Vallstena in particular. Some people do think the mask is still significant, including Price & Mortimer, who suggest that the recently discovered eye was removed and buried in the house ("Conservator Magnus Mårtensson (Personal Communication, 2011) has observed no tool marks on the rivets, and has therefore speculated that it may well have fallen out due to corrosion, or when the mask was first dug up by the detectorist. In our opinion, and that of the excavator, the singular fact that only the eye was found more likely suggests that it was deliberately removed. The obvious inference is that the ‘eyeless’ Roman mask had been given two new eyes, presumably after its arrival in Sweden. After this was done, one of the eyes had then been removed, making the mask one-eyed. The relative sequence is impossible to determine, but it seems likely that the mask was nailed to the roof-supporting post in the Hellvi building and the extracted eye buried in the floor below (Figure 12). It is probably not coincidental that the post chosen was directly in front of a wall cache containing valuable and possibly ritual objects.") The British Museum's curator of the European Early Medieval Collections also brought up this mask specifically when I spoke to her about the topic this summer, and seemed to think that it, more so than some other examples of individual eyes (e.g., the Gevninge helmet fragment and the Uppåkra helmet fragment), supported the idea that eyes were intentionally modified (she found the specific reason for the modifications less clear). --Usernameunique (talk) 23:30, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
@Usernameunique: That sounds like a very interesting and plausible hypothesis. I'm no archaeologist or historian but since I lived on Gotland for nearly three decades, I somehow soaked up its history and general knowledge about the place. At first I just did major articles like Visby City Wall, Spillings Hoard, Havor Hoard, Bulverket, Lummelunda Cave and such. But since Gotland has (and still do) interacted with so many other cultures and countries, I soon found names of places and events realted to the island popping up in the most unlikely places. I mean, who'd have thought that I would be able to put together List of Gotland-related asteroids! So I decided to at least provide some kind of "infrastructure" with small articles for the island; articles that can be expanded later by me or others. Admittedly, it is sometimes hard not to add "just a little bit more" when you are writing about places like Mästerby, Gnisvärd or Tofta. :) It is a rewarding job, since I get small 'pings' rather frequently when some article has been linked to one in the Gotland bunch. Fell free to add anything you think is relevant, if you like, to Hellvi or any other article. cart-Talk 00:49, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Havor Ring.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Havor Ring.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Socken

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Du tycks ha missuppfattat vad socken i Sverige är och var distrikt är. Du har i wikidata felaktigt angivit att distrikt ersätter socknar det stämmer inte alls. Du har också i artiklar om tex gammelgarn skrivit helt tokigt och blandat ort med socken.Yger (talk) 12:56, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Hej Yger, tack för att du hörde av dig. Nej, jag har inte missuppfattat vad skillnaden på distrikt och socken är. På Gotland är det dock så att distrikten har samma geografiska utsträckning som de gamla socknarna, så det är endast den administrativa benämningen som har ändrats. Se t ex på Gammelgarns sockens svenska artikel där det står "Gammelgarns socken ingick i Gotlands norra härad, ingår sedan 1971 i Gotlands kommun och motsvarar från 2016 Gammelgarns distrikt." Kanske det är ordet "reconstitute" som du hänger upp dig på. Det innebär ju att socknen försvann och att platsen istället går under beteckningen distrikt. Området är ju exakt detsamma men benämningen på det har ändrats. Vad gäller de olika platser som benämns med samma namn, som till exempel Hablingbo så har ju svenska wiki separata artiklar för alla de olika begeppen med det namnet (socken, kyrkby, distrikt, församling, landskommun). Denna uppdelning är dock för detaljerad när det gäller engelska wiki. Jag valde därför att ge artiklarna det övergipande namnet som då är socknens och i den artikeln även förklara vilka de andra användningarna också kan vara. På det sättet kan senare artiklar knoppas av ifall någon vill översätta samtliga de olika betydelserna till engelska. Genom att endast använda det gemensamma övegripande namnet, så följer jag även det språkbruk som används på Gotland. Jag har bott där i omkrng 30 år och är mycket väl insatt i stället.
Eventuellt kan det ju vara på sin plats att förklara ombildningen från socken till distrikt i artiklarna och jag tar gärna emot förslag på hur detta kan göras.
Vad gäller ditt exempel Gammelgarn så ser jag ingen sammanblandning där mellan socken och kyrkby/ort eftersom det inte finns någon kyrkby där. Gammelgarn är endast namnet på det större området. Det enda jag kan se är att det kan vara på sin plats att byta ut ordet "settlement" mot "area". Skulle det vara bättre tycker du? Tacksam för mer återkoppling. cart-Talk 13:34, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Yger, jag kollade igenom några av de andra artiklarna och ser att i vissa som kom till innan jag började jobba med det här projektet, som t ex Västerhejde, så är faktiskt småorten och socknen hopblandade. Jag ska naturligtvis se till att röja upp det på bästa sätt. Tack för att du sa till annars hade jag nog inte upptäckt det. cart-Talk 13:49, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Nej du har fel (och det är jag som skrivit all dessa artiklar på svwp). Socknen användes för att registrera fastigheter i och gjorde så till perioden 1968-1990. Fornminne har registrerats per socken och gör så fortsatt (samma med hembygds och museisaker). Lantmäteriet håller fotsatt ordning på socknarna, ingen ändring 2016. Befolkningsrapportering skedde fram till 2016 per församling . 2016 skapades det abstrakta begreppet distrikt av SCB, för att användas för befolkningsrapportering. Så socken finns fortsatt och distrikten är enbart en forsättning av en aspekt av församlingarna. Att de sedan täcker samma område är värt nämna. Socknarna finns kvar och distrikten är inte en efterföljare till socknar (som inte upphört). Jag är just på väg stötta en användare i Visby (VisbyStar) som vill jobba med hembygdsfolk på Gotland runt Gotland socknar. Kanske du är intresserad vara med?Yger (talk) 13:57, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Yger: Aha, då förstår jag vad du menar. Jag vet ju att arkeologer fortsatt använder sockenindelningen men trodde det var mer av tradition än att de faktiskt fanns kvar, även om man på Gotland ju är väldigt glad i att använda ordet socken istället för distrikt. Jag ska se till att rensa upp bland artiklarna (och wikidata) och göra dom mer korrekta men samtidigt begripliga för alla engelsktalande som blir förvirrade av att vi har samma namn på så många olika saker. Det kan dock ta lite tid eftersom det är många sidor att fixa, så du får ha lite tålamod. Det ska bli bra till slut. Mitt största problem här på eng-wiki är ju annars att reda upp skillnaden mellan församling och socken. Många ersätter hej vilt socken med "parish". Tack för din inbjudan, men just nu har jag tillräckligt med jobb att fixa klart och reda ut det här lilla projektet. Jag har sett 'Visby Star', eller snarare det användarnamn han hade tidigare, och hans bilder på Commons där jag också är mycket aktiv (Min sida). Jag bor dessutom numera i Lysekil, men vill ändå se till att alla platser på Gotland får ett omnämnande här på den engelska internationella avdelningen. Jag har märkt att många artiklar här länkar till ställen på Gotland i och med all historia och internationella kontakter. cart-Talk 14:16, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Tack för bra svar! Ja att förklara socken och dess skillnad mot församling är en utmaning för engelsktalande, där även jag går bet. Parish är ju begreppet som används och där finns det i Sverige fyra olika begrepp som motsvara det. Lycka till med ditt fixanade.Yger (talk) 15:14, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Editing.

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello W.carter,

I'm kind of back and did some editing in some articles. Also, I found several incomplete and problematic areas in the article Joanna Angelett (I noted, that the article has been even placed in the “Category:Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2017”), and tried to fix it in the best possible way, and corrected dead links as well. About two and a half months ago I sent an email to Angelett Gallery with request to supply me with the photos, that illustrates an important event, mentioned in the text — the presentation of the internationally recognized project Tree of Life by Angelett to the Governor of Australia in Canberra, and the photos of some works, which also have been mentioned in the article, and today I received two requested photos and tried to fit them into the corresponded sections. I hope that all is done reasonably well.

Regards, Chris OxfordChris Oxford (talk) 19:41, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi Chris The text and references look ok to me. The photos could be a bit better placed. It's not necessary to have them exactly where they are mentioned in the text, they just need to be nearby It is more important to place them so the layout doesn't disturb the section or so you don't get text "sandwiched" between two photos (see MOS:SANDWICH. I'll tweak this for you in the article so that you'll see what I mean. You can tweak it further after that if you like. cart-Talk 20:19, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

It is absolutely great. I like it exactly as it is. Thank you, W.carter very much for your help. The article looks just excellent now. And it was really good to hear from you. All the very best. Chris OxfordChris Oxford (talk) 21:45, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

LeClerc tanks for the Swedish Army?

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi! Hope you are having a good 2019 so far. Sorry I haven't been around much lately, had a fair bit on my plate recently among other things. Hopefully I'll be around a bit more this year.

I'm hearing reports that Sweden's next MBT may end up being the LeClerc. Is there anything in the news about this over at your end? Ceannlann gorm (talk) 15:03, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

@Ceannlann gorm: Sorry, I can't help you. I'm out of touch wrt military stuff now. I'm not as active on WP as I used to be either. Just trying to tie up some loose ends on projects I started. cart-Talk 15:17, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
@W.carter: Ok, thanks anyhow. I'm in something of the same boat as you with regards to contributing to the wiki, in part because some of the recent changes with how Wikipedia is run have left me a bit cold. :( Oh well, if you need anything, just give me a shout, I'll be checking up on my talk page & such somewhat more regularly in the coming months. :) Ceannlann gorm (talk) 15:36, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:51, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

I was origionally Frogger 48, I want to start off fresh from my past mistakes.

ABCD5798 (talk) 05:10, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:17, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

 
News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

Lisa

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I just created an article about the murder of Lisa Holm, if you find time for it please take a look.BabbaQ (talk) 13:51, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't think I have the time right now. Too much going on IRL. Hope you get some other help with it. cart-Talk 14:58, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Grievous Blunder

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

<Sith apprentice emergency survival mode>My most humble apologies, my Master! (Urgently glances furtively around for a good scapegoat)</Sith apprentice emergency survival mode> Ceannlann gorm (talk) 12:15, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks to your blunder there are now tags on the articles helping other people to not make the same mistake. In the long run, it ended up well. :-) cart-Talk 12:30, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Thank you my Master! (flees) Ceannlann gorm (talk) 12:42, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Brofiorden

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I found your picture of an old jetty at Brofjorden and liked it enormously. So much so that, seeing you had released it free of copyright for commercial use, I have used it on the cover of a novel I have written, "At Maunston Quay". On the inside front cover I have given you full credit for the image. I hope you are cool with that. Indie published, the sales are very low unfortunately! However, I would like to send you a copy of the book, if you'd like that. I have been to Sweden myself many times, mainly Stockholm, of course, but also Uppsala and Gothenburg. You can reach me at (e-mail removed as a courtesy for the sake of Bot activity). I wanted to seek you out and let you know what I have done - I found another of my covers in a similar way and reached out to the photographer just the same. Again, I hope you don't mind my using your great photo! Hopefully lots more people will see it. Ian 86.171.189.36 (talk) 07:46, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello Ian, that was very nice to hear. :-) I happy to know whenever one of my photos get used somewhere. I have put a note about the use as cover art on the photos file page (link). I will contact you on your e-mail later. I wish you all the best and I hope you sell many copies of your book! cart-Talk 08:12, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:37, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:53, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello from Germany after a long time :-)

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello W.carter I started a new article - not ready yet. If I ready then I send you the info. In the last years real life was a very strong master - in the next too. all the best.--Maxim Pouska (talk) 09:24, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi Maxim Pouska I'm rather busy here too, but when you think the article is ready, you can tell me and I'll see if I have time to help you. Good luck! --cart-Talk 09:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:W.carter/Archive_20&oldid=999156465"