User talk:WATP/Archive 2
Back FC
editWhy apply for speedy deletion?
Allanmac9 00:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
And what is notable criteria?
Allanmac9 00:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Actually, I am looking at the criteria. Its very unfair, clubs in the Scottish Amateur League(Lowland clubs usually) are allowed pages.
Oh wait whats this? your club is "Probably Notable" if you have supplied a player to a national side, wait we have - Andy Gray, albeit that he didn't get chosen untill he was at Dundee United. And alot of clubs in Scotland have never supplied a player to the National side, I ask how many players for East Stiringshire have gone on to supply a player for the national side, same with Gretna, same with Elgin.
Oh whats this again? 10+ Caps, nail on the head there, how many caps did Andy Gray win? 100+ appearence for a club? he made over 100 appearences for two top level clubs. He played for in all 7 premier divison sides of their respected nations, winning the Cup Winners Cup with one of them, Everton.
Oh another one, clubs, who don't normally charge an entrance fee for spectators, i'll have you know that you do need to pay to get in to a Back Fc game, who do you think we are, a school side?
Also why do England get to ahve pages for clubs from the first 8 divisons of football? I'm sure the Amateur seen is probably in the top 6 of the Scottish divisons.
Explain your rules to me again, thank you.
Allanmac9 01:22, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Well since you deleted the page, I encourage you, actually I dare you to put these funny deleting things on these pages too since they are also amateur sides in Scotland playing at the same level but in a different region.
St Patrick's Former Pupils F.C. Oban Saints F.C. Eaglesham Amateur F.C.
All the clubs playing in this league, Central Scottish Amateur Football League and this league Kingdom Caledonian Football League
Oh and if you don't delete all of them, i'll just make a new Back FC page:). I could go as far to say that your discriminating my club.
Explain yourself...
Navigation Popups
editI am a new popup user and I can't figure out how to do instant reverts. Would you be so kind to clue me in?Scottydude 22:41, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks so much. I really appreciate it.
Nicknames
editI am trying to discuss the topic of nicknames for Rangers fc and I keep having my comments removed by another user.
Can you help ?
I see that you do have a barnstar for 'crossing the OF divide'
I wanted to discuss the possibility of adding some other common nicknames to the page Rangers FC but instead of just applying them I thought it would be proper to discuss them first. However, one user will not let me even discuss them as he personally does not like the nicknames that I am refering to.
Should other users not have their say before things are added/deleted?
Should one member be aloud to decide what should and should not be topic for discussion on a talk page?
Hope you can help, thanks!
ps User is using pop-up software.
WikiProject Rock music invitation
editHello WikiProject Alternative music member.
WikiProject Alternative music, in my eyes, has proved to be successful "improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock", and improving their quality as well. One specific example I have witnessed is The Smashing Pumpkins article. The page has gone from a mediocre work, to GA status, to FA nomination. Only appropriate, as the Pumpkins are undeniably one of the most influential alternative rock bands on the 1990's and beyond.
This is the stuff I wish to achieve with the somewhat recently ressurected WikiProject Rock music. I hope to also attract attention to rock music articles of all sorts, and hopefully change some to GA or FA status. I invite you to come join us, and not only be a member of alternative Wikipedians, but the rockin' ones as well.
Rock on.
-- Reaper X 03:14, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
FAID 18-25 February
editBirmingham City F.C. has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
Stuart McCall, Andy Goram and Richard Gough
editCan you please explain why you edited out the pieces on Stuart McCall, Andy Goram and Richard Gough? Is it not fact that they chose not to play for the country in which they were born?
The point about McCall 'turning his back on the land of his birth' is factual, yet you have changed this to 'his heart eventually overcame his head, and he switched to Scotland.' There is no citation for this and it is pure speculation. There's no need to let the truth get in the way of a good story though, as we've found before with your amendments to 'History of Rangers FC.'
As for your assertion that the changes were badly worded, don't be so silly. If you can't find a proper reason to delete something I have written, don't insult my intelligence by denouncing my considerably superior linguistic skills. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scaitch Trinita (talk • contribs)
Celtic F.C. Notable players
editWhy did you change the celtic noteable palyers page after a edited it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Liam D1 (talk • contribs)
Removal of famous fans
editThere are a lot of policies flying about. Could we have a link please, that'd be reet nice. (Quentin X 23:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC))
Ally McCoist
edithow is the material unsourced it it had verifiable sources in the original edit —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobscot (talk • contribs)
why is my editing unsourced the original content was listed with full sources —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobscot (talk • contribs)
it doesnt explain why YOU think its unsourced material —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobscot (talk • contribs)
original sources cited on 11th january so whats the problem —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobscot (talk • contribs)
www.highbeamresearch.com or findarticles.com both have detailed information on all the points added
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4161/is_20050828/ai_n14899029 http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4161/is_20010930/ai_n14537466
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobscot (talk • contribs)
ta —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobscot (talk • contribs)
could we come to an agreement or comprimise on celtics noteable palyer?
Backpass Bazza
editI am only editing it to include known facts about the said professional footballer to include a more broad perspective. The vast majority of his passes are backwards or to the side and generally hamper any attacking moves as evident by his many displays in Scotland and Blackburn colours. As a result, I am forced to conclude that it is indeed you who is vandalising the Barry Ferguson page by unincluding these commonly held views by a vast majority of Scots and football fans in general. PS: Backpass and Sideways Barry are two common names for the said professional footballer. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.41.236.119 (talk) 20:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC).
The discussion of adding nicknames to Rangers F.C.
editIn your opinion it is inappropriate. Are we not supposed to discuss these things, giving the entire community a chance to voice their opinions? Are you the owner of this page? (Rangers F.C.) Are you or Dudeswiper in charge of this page?
I believe that you are stopping discussion. I believe that to be against Wiki policy. I could have just added the nickname but instead I chose to discuss the potential addition. You will not even let me do that......
I appreciate your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.113.199.109 (talk • contribs)
Nacho Novo
editQuite why you feel the great man's acting talents should be ignored, is a question I feel even you, with your above-genius intellect, can't answer.
Trigger's Spanish cousin for ever!!!!!!!!
What do you honestly think will impress his grandkids more? Appearing in an all-time classic sitcom adored by millions, or playing for a well-supported pub team?
MERVYN KING! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sillypantsendon (talk • contribs) 22:17, 3 March 2007 (UTC).
Rangers FC
editAb99,
!!!
If you doubt the veracity of my addition please seek other sources (a quick Google search should suffice). I am happy for you to edit my contributions but I think that you have been draconian about this.
Please revert or I will raise a complaint about you.
Please look at the following link:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/scotland/sportscotland/asportingnation/article/0047/print.shtml
I am assuming from all the discussion on this page that you are in fact a Rangers fan and should not be protecting the editing of this page. If you do not revert to the version I last left I will take this further.
Sincerely- K02 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kenneth02 (talk • contribs) 11:06, 12 March 2007 (UTC).
AIV
editThank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you!
Edits
editI'm talking about the deletion concerning nicknames for Rangers FC and their fans. Are you claiming that I am inaccurate when I state the most common nickname for Rangers among SPL fans is 'The Huns'? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kenneth02 (talk • contribs) 17:39, 13 March 2007 (UTC).
- Fair enough. I can see the point in that. Although I would argue that surely you will wax partizan when you are reviewing edits of the Rangers page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kenneth02 (talk • contribs)
Thanks...
editFor reverting my user page and updating my stats! ... discospinster talk 20:29, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Dear Archibald99,
Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.
hey dude
editi have this really cool idea about a thing that could cause less violence in the world. please help me with it. thanks! if you want to e-mail me at [email protected] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by *cute neo bunnyese* (talk • contribs) 18:52, 23 March 2007 (UTC).
Re: Vandalism
editI beg to differ but i fail to see how it is vandalism i am merely stating facts. It will be re-edited and if you revert it i will report YOU for vandalism
Joseph Borovsky
editHi there; I have not amended your tag, but for the record Dr Joseph Borovsky is indeed a real life physicist employed at Los Alamos. I wonder, in view of the very poor quality of the article but in the light of its essential factuality, whether {{prod}} might be better than {{db-bio}}?--Anthony.bradbury 00:04, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Football AID 25 March - 1 April
editWembley Stadium has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
Ibrox Stadium
editMy amendment to the Ibrox Stadium article is not vandalism. The reference to Castle Grayskull is accurate and verifiable, and does not breach copyright. It may be considered offensive by Rangers fans but that does not make it unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopaedia. I have consulted several regular users of Wikipedia on this and they agree with me unanimously. There is even a reference to this on the Wikipedia page on Castle Grayskull. If that has been deemed suitable for inclusion on that page, then there is no rational justification not to include it on the Ibrox Stadium page too. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Youngdegsy (talk • contribs) 17:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC).
Thanks for your reply. However, I do disagree with you and will have to take this to dispute resolution using the formal procedure. This revisal is not unsuitable, as you suggest. I note that you didn't comment on my point about the Castle Grayskull page. One of the main purposes of Wikipedia, or indeed any encyclopaedia, is to provide relevant, factual information. Ibrox is known as Castle Grayskull by fans across Scotland. Whether a reference to it would be unusual or not, or even unique, is scarcely relevant. To suggest that this is neither notable nor encyclopedic is, with respect, a clear indication of bias. Youngdegsy 18:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, seeing you have been involved in previous Afd debates I invite you to contribute to this discussion to clarify certain issues about football player notability. I think clearer guidelines are needed to avoid repeated inappropriate nominations for deletion and time consuming discussions. Cheers! StephP 17:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Celtic players
editHello You seem to be good at naming former players and I was wondering if you could tell me of any American,South Americans or Italians to have played for Celtic other than the obvious ones of course e.g Annoni and Di Canio —Preceding unsigned comment added by LiamD1 (talk • contribs)
- Wit about wee J-Nenio and Ralphie Shide?--Vintagekits 22:40, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Alternative music and sources
editAs part of the Alternative music WikiProject, we're gathering a list of sources on this page. Could you take a look and perhaps add any written references you have access to? Thanks! CloudNine 10:03, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Football AID 8 April - 15 April
editLiverpool F.C. has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
Celtic player list
editCould you remove my talk from the celtic player list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LiamD1 (talk • contribs)
cheers for the info —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yatesy1988 (talk • contribs)
Rangers Pictures for the French Wiki
editHello, I'm a french man who is currently working on the french Rangers FC article (nick : Obsidian 7). I've seen you have interesting pictures for the Rangers... And it's hard to find ! So can you publish them on WikiCommons where I can use them ? Specially the card display for the recent history section and the photo of John Fleck for the formation section , but also the Greig's statue for the Ibrox article. And if you have more pics, it will be fully appreciated ;-).
For information, the Rangers FC page on the french wikipedia : French Rangers FC article (it's not fully terminated).
An other question : Is the "Rangers Greatest Team Ever" considered as official for the club ?
Thank you and sorry for the bad english !
Obsidian 7 74.105.28.210 23:16, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the fast answer ! Your pics will be well used :-D !
- I'll make my own research for the greatest team, maybe I'll be lucky !
- Obsidian 7 00:17, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Image:Franz Ferdinand.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Franz Ferdinand.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShadowHalo 04:18, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Scotland footy peer review
editJust wanted to let you know I've made a few comments here. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help get the article ready for featured article nomination or if you'd like me to explain myself further! Cheers for now. The Rambling Man 16:26, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Football AID 15 - 22 April
editBernd Schuster has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
I am gay, apparently
editu r gay—Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.50.168.6 (talk • contribs)
Celtic FC`
editHey, i see you're cleaning up the Celtic page, need any help, just say !
From a Massive Celtic fan ! Celticfan383 18:55, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Football AID 22 April - 29 April
editLeeds United A.F.C. has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
NME
editI wasn't vandlising the NME wikipedia page. It's the truth, believe it or not. I've done nothing but speak my mind on the matter.
{{Scotland-footy-goalkeeper-stub}} etc
editHi - I see you have recently created a new stub type. As it states at Wikipedia:Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 07:35, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Naperville Central alumni
editWhy did you delete my revision of Naperville Central Alumni?—Preceding unsigned comment added by WickiMaster (talk • contribs)
What is your interest in Naperville Central Alumni and why do you feel the need to police a community website? It kind of ruins the point of Wikipedia if someone like yourself is making moral judgements for personal reasons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WickiMaster (talk • contribs)
Alternative music WikiProject newsletter
edit
Issue 1 - April 2007 | |
|
Swidden, CattleGirl, UncleMontezuma, Dark Devil, RedHotRageSlave, Kudasai, Sjones23, Triviumchick1990 and Mr Richardson joined the alternative music ranks during April.
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
Delivered by CloudNine 14:22, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Last change
editSorry, I shouldn't have sworn. I see you picked up on the edit I was making and reworded it- thank you. May I suggest that you explain who Rangers are, or link to their wiki page, so that people can see that they are a real football club and that the page isn't a wind-up.
Glad to help both with the info and the suggestion.
Champions again. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.151.193.246 (talk) 16:50, 1 May 2007 (UTC).
Football AID 6 May - 13 May
editJairzinho has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
The French's back
editHello, you have an other pic that can be usefull for the french wiki :
Can you put it on your WikiCommons account ?
Good luck for making the Rangers article a featured article ! I hope I can do the same thing on the French Wiki by the end of the month.
Obsidian 7 05:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Re: my last edit to the Rangers article. How was/is it looking to you? The section below the (above) image was indented about two inches, but I was wondering if it was the same for you. - Dudesleeper · Talk 15:27, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- I thought my bookmarks sidebar was the reason it needed the extra linebreak, but apparently not. Now just the "Notable players" heading is indented on my screen. - Dudesleeper · Talk 15:37, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Your username
editPlease do consider amending your username. Some people find it offensive. Cloveoil 21:14, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Discussion continued, as requested*
Explain please. WATP (talk) • (contribs) 21:19, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Explain what, specifically? Cloveoil 21:23, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- What exactly offends you about it. WATP (talk) • (contribs) 21:26, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:The_Long_Blondes_-_Giddy_Stratospheres.ogg
edit
Thanks for uploading Image:The_Long_Blondes_-_Giddy_Stratospheres.ogg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 22:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Rationale now asserted - Thanks :) ShakespeareFan00 23:10, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Image:The_Rakes_-_Retreat.ogg
edit
I have tagged Image:The_Rakes_-_Retreat.ogg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 22:46, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Rationale now asserted - Thanks :) ShakespeareFan00 23:09, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 14th, 2007.
edit
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 20 | 14 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
According to his article, he made his Scotland debut in '92, and he was at Rangers between '92 and '94. How come he got the chop from the internationalists list? - Dudesleeper · Talk 09:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Your dates appear to be right. I'll correct his article. - Dudesleeper · Talk 09:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Or mebbe not. ;) - Dudesleeper · Talk 09:28, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Scott Brown
editI'm under the impression he has joined Celtic already - BBC Sport and Celtic say so. Mattythewhite 15:20, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- But Jean-Claude Darcheville had been stated to join in the summer, and Alan Gow is a pre-contract agreement. Mattythewhite 15:26, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi WATP/Archive 2, as a WikiProject Scotland participant, please check out this this thread and consider adding the bot results page to your watchlist so we can manually update the New Articles page. There are some false results for the first batch, but I'm sure we can collectively tune the rules to improve the output.
If we get enough people watching the results page, we'll be cooking with gas as they say :) This looks like a great helper in finding new Scotland related material. Cheers. --Cactus.man ✍ 02:07, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- Brilliant, in the midst of my edit-conflicted effort, you plonked it right in there - thanks. Just what we need, keep up the great work.--Cactus.man ✍ 19:08, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. :) WATP (talk) • (contribs) 19:20, 17 May 2007 (UTC)