WDMGray

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zero Petroleum (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zero Petroleum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Zero Petroleum, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 14:19, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi,

Thank you for taking the time to review the Zero Petroleum article. I have read the feedback and hope you can take the time to read my further thoughts and provide some advice on how we can work together to amend this to suit requirements.

This is, of course, a page for a business but I do not feel it is advertising in any way more than Shell, Cadburys or any other company is advertising. As an example, this is a list of solar power companies present on Wikipedia Category:Solar energy companies. Many of these have far fewer credible sources than I have put in this article. Please can you explain how these companies' pages do not classify as advertising and the Zero Petroleum page does?

Zero Petroleum is one of the leaders in developing innovative technology for net zero, and its presence on wikipedia would provide a valuable source of information. Its work has been spoken about extensively in major global media, and those citations have been made in the article. As such, I welcome your advice on what changes can be made or what more that can be done to achieve this company's rightful mention on Wikipedia in a neutral manner.

Many thanks,

Will WDMGray (talk) 11:29, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I read your draft and it looked OK to me. With regards to what you say here, please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. In short, the existence of other articles on Wikipedia and their problems does not justify the existence and problems of another article, like your draft. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 12:39, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for feeding back. If the draft looked OK, how do I go about getting it accepted to be published? Thank you for the 'otherstuffexists' link - that is understood. However, on the basis of the article being credible in its own right, how can I get it approved to be published? Thank you. WDMGray (talk) 12:42, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, WDMGray! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Numberguy6 (talk) 14:19, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Zero Petroleum has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Zero Petroleum. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 03:49, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zero Petroleum has been accepted

Zero Petroleum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:56, 4 January 2023 (UTC)