WHOSHE71
May 2016
edit
Hello, I'm Amccann421. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tazz has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Amccann421 (talk) 21:53, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Amccann421. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Steve Lombardi without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Amccann421 (talk) 23:08, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Steve Lombardi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been or will be undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. If you think it's true, prove it. Amccann421 (talk) 05:08, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tazz with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:06, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Steve Lombardi. Amccann421 (talk) 04:37, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tazz. Materialscientist (talk) 08:51, 24 May 2016 (UTC)