WP Editor 2012

Re: Question iCarly

I'm not familiar with these locations. I'm fairly busy at the moment in real life, so most of my edits the week are just minor things. However, I'd be happy to take a look at this when I get a chance. I'll let you know as soon as I've done so. In the meantime, you might want to try Googling this to see if someone at Nickelodeon or someone with the show has mentioned this anywhere (it could even be from Twitter, as long as the account is verified). If you can find something from a reputable source that concretely states that they have moved production locations, I see no problem with adding it to the article. Kevinbrogers (talk) 18:34, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Re: 2012–13 United States network television schedule

I unprotected it; it was set to expire soon anyway so I didn't mind doing so .It can be recreated now. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 21:15, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

iCarly episodes

Hello. Neither a blog nor Youtube is appropriate for reliably referencing information on Wikipedia. Please wait for a reliable third-party source to reference the number of episodes in the current season. Many thanks for your understanding. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:46, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:06, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Re:

Thank you for your message. I'm super happy you have dedication for that article, but that article isn't just using that ad for a source. It's also using this. So were going to assume that article has a fourth season. But If you find a reliable source that makes season 4 questionable, please share that on the article's talk page. Happy editing! (:

Webclient101 (talk) 04:57, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, WP Editor 2012. You have new messages at Talk:ICarly (season 7).
Message added 22:44, 9 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I moved your message to the article talk page and replied there Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:44, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of 2012–13 United States network television schedule for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2012–13 United States network television schedule is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012–13 United States network television schedule (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. gwickwire | Leave a message 02:19, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

re: production dates

Hello. The date for iGo to Japan is accurate because according to some sites, season 2 of iCarly began filming in April 2008, and iGo to Japan was the first episode of that season filmed, so it is reasonable. The dates for iDate a Bad Boy and iFight Shelby Marx are just educated guesses. I based hem off of their prod codes and kind of estimated when they were filmed. The date for iQuit iCarly is May 2009 because set photos show that Miranda Cosgrove's birthday was celebrated. Just FYI. JaciFan 16:45, 27 November 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JaciFan (talk • contribs)

December 2012

[[

Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Crash & Bernstein into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:16, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WP Editor 2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I use a shared sever and I am not able to edit at this time.

Decline reason:

Per the block log we won't be unblocking this proxy, You will have to use your native ip. Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:53, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Your account is not blocked. Could you please attempt editing the sandbox, and then - if you are still blocked - follow the instructions here? - Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:23, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

• Those instructions are for dealing with an autoblock, but your account is not showing as autoblocked, so I think that is unlikely to help. You may have been affected by an autoblock which has now expired, in which case you will now be able to edit, and if so please remove the unblock request, so that administrators don't waste their time checking it out. Alternatively, you may be affected by an IP block, in which case you will need to tell us what IP address is blocked. That information will be included in the message you see when you when you try to edit and are told that you can't. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:10, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

The ip is 99.19.12.152. I am able to ,edit from other ip though but those are mainly public. --WP Editor 2012 (talk) 16:27, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

• here is the block log for that ip. It doesn't at first blush suggest we will be amending the block anytime soon. Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:51, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, WP Editor 2012. You have new messages at Talk:List of Victorious episodes.
Message added 19:12, 14 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:12, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

I've given my view on the Talk Page. - Alec (talk) 17:36, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Carlo's Bake Shop

Hi. A belated welcome to Wikipedia. Just so you know, sites with user-generated content, such as personal blogs, open forums, wikis, imdb, Patch Media, etc., cannot be used as sources under Wikipedia:USERG, which is part of the Reliable Sources policy.

In addition, it makes little sense to blindly revert a passage that is phrased in the future tense about an event that took place eight days ago. (Please see WP:DATED.) Since the NorthJersey citation you added is more than sufficient for the actual opening of the shop, detailing when the announcement of it was made is unnecessary anyway.

If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 15:45, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, WP Editor 2012. You have new messages at Geraldo Perez's talk page.
Message added 16:34, 6 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:34, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

FYI

See message I left at User talk:ICarlytranslator#June 2013 ([1])related to a valid edit revert you did. I don't edit on eswiki so don't know their rules. If you do you edit there you may wish to look into referencing on that article on eswiki. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Potential admin

Hi, I notice you're on Wikipedia:List of administrator hopefuls. Wikipedia would benefit from more admins. If you have been editing for more than 12 months (preferably 24+ months), and have been editing fairly consistently for the past 6 months (preferably 12+ months) with at least 100 edits a month (this tool will help) - or an explanation for any gaps, and haven't been blocked in the past three years - or a good explanation for a recent block, don't have a recent history of edit warring or arguing with other editors, feel you can explain why you wish to be an admin, can demonstrate some understanding of Wikipedia's procedures and processes, or know where to go for guidance, and are confident enough to go through a RfA, please get in touch with me. We can talk about it some more, and if all looks OK, I'll nominate you. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 09:35, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi. I notice you haven't responded. No worries. I'll mark you down on my list as not interested at the moment, but if you do change your mind, please do get in touch so we can talk about how likely you are to meet the criteria to become an admin, or what you need to be doing to improve your chances. Regards SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 09:00, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Re: Henry Danger

What you reverted to is more aesthetically pleasing in terms of grammar, but I just wanted to note that there's no such thing as a "correct summary," as summaries must be written using your own words and cannot be copy-paste, even if sourced. Cheers! Amaury (talk) 15:26, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Re: Girl Meets World

Well, I feel embarrassed. I misread the hidden note and thought there was a "not" still in there. Awkward... Amaury (talk) 16:51, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Re: Game Shakers

I'm curious: what makes you feel like October 13 may be the incorrect air date? Is it because it's a Tuesday? If so, there are times when shows air on a special date/time for one reason or another. Only time will tell, however. :) Amaury (talk) 14:34, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

That's mainly it, I know they have done this before, but Zapit has been acting very weird lately. I do think something is up and is not airing that day. Will see what happens. The futon should finally update this week, so will have a better idea.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Schneider's Bakery

Using rowspan to merge cells makes tables difficult to read with screen readers, making them less accessible to some with disabilities. See Wikipedia:Accessibility dos and don'ts. Rowspan is discouraged. I won't edit war on this, but I think it is discourteous to some users. Sundayclose (talk) 16:53, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Okay I did not know about that. I put it back the way it was. Just next time may I advise if you explain in the edit summary and check the edits that are fine before you revert. I left the series section alone as that part is not too confussing and should be understood easy. if not I can do that at another time. WP Editor 2012 (talk) 21:52, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

June 2016

[[

File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of Henry Danger episodes. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk) 20:43, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Yes, this is not a path you want to go down. I suggest you drop this while it's still your choice. FWIW. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:55, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:List of Henry Danger episodes#Number of episodes for second season

[[

File:Farm-Fresh eye.png|15px|link=|alt=]]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of Henry Danger episodes#Number of episodes for second season. Amaury (talk) 20:50, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, WP Editor 2012. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, WP Editor 2012. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

] about some of the results.

Blocked?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WP Editor 2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not sure to the reason I was blocked, I have no relation to the sock or case that I was tagged in. I don't edit much as I don't usually need to, but do every so often. Sure I have disagreements between users, but I have just dealt with users by just going to the take pages or ignoring it completely after 3 times. I don't spend to much time here as my time is usually spent over at the Henry Danger wiki editing [2], I am a well respected user over there and cary my work over here at times. WP Editor 2012 (talk) 20:45, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 22:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Jpgordon: :@Berean Hunter: I never have used more than one account. I do edit on a library computer most of the time when I am on this account. I have read the case that was file and in today's :@Zzuuzz: seemed spectacle. [3]. Plus the users in question have not really edited and has just attacked users, and I have not once did that when I disagreed with other users.WP Editor 2012 (talk) 23:23, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Spectacle? I fully concur with the previous checkusers who have looked at this. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 23:36, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, I miss read your statement on the report. Anyway I am not related in anyway to his/her socks of simulation12 or the accounts that reported me. I do edit on shared networks, but only have created this account. WP Editor 2012 (talk) 00:13, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

WP Editor 2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #21428 was submitted on May 05, 2018 02:25:30. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 02:25, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Unblock request 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WP Editor 2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand the rules of Wikipedia for Wikipedia:Sock puppetryand have never used more than one account. My edits are constructive and useful when editing on the site. I make sure I talk about issues if I disagree with a user. One user I have interacted with has also has doubts with the case as seen here [4]. Please reconsider my block.WP Editor 2012 (talk) 19:16, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I have to agree with my colleagues above - the CheckUser evidence is unambiguous. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:35, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I support the unblocking of this account as I edit with this user on the Henry Danger Wiki. This user is WP Editor 2012 and User Checker Fred at the Henry Danger wiki. I edit with him under my account Bigteddy https://henrydanger.wikia.com/wiki/Administrators and he is a great and very useful admin over there and wouldn't do anything to harm Wikipedia. Bigteddy1 (talk) 19:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Bigteddy1 for coming here and supporting the unblock. I do edit over at the Henry Danger wiki on a daily bases as user Checker Fred. I have been voted best admins during our Henry Danger wiki awards and would never do anything to harm Wikipedia. [5] and [6]

DoRD can I ask you want evidence/edits are linking me to the account of simulation12 or any other of his/her accounts? I see no resemblance between the accounts I have two users that have there doubts Bigteddy1 and Geraldo Perez with the comments on his page that I link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WP Editor 2012 (talk • contribs) 19:53, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

CheckUser evidence. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:56, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

I have never used another account in my life. I do use public places to edit, but never have created another account. I only want to help Wikipedia not harm it. WP Editor 2012 (talk) 20:04, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

I checked my account with others listed in the case with these and no matches detailing that I am a sock or related to these accounts.

https://tools.wmflabs.org/betacommand-dev/UserCompare/Simulation12.html

https://tools.wmflabs.org/interaction-timeline?wiki=enwiki&user=WP%20Editor%202012&user=Simulation12

https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py?users=Simulation12&users=WP+Editor+2012&users=&startdate=&enddate=&ns=&server=enwiki

DoRD zzuuzz Berean Hunter Geraldo Perez

I see no relation top any of the accounts. WP Editor 2012 (talk) 20:28, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Your ping to User:Geraldo Perez won't have worked, so fixed. There are matches not only in the articles but in the general topic areas. Consider also some of the sockpuppets.[7][8][9] IMO the CheckUser data is as clear as day. The person who has been trolling Bigteddy1 is either the same person, or is sat right alongside, this user. And the same applies to Simulation12. This has been the case multiple times over a long period with the chances being entirely minimal. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 21:23, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Restaurant Express

The article Restaurant Express has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 26 April 2022 (UTC)