WTCM47
WTCM47 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't know what anyone is talking about. I did not have multiple accounts. Please, I just want to edit. You may be blocking me because I did a rude note on talk page. I am sorry about that if you are blocking me because of that. I just was angry that he reverted 7 of my edits.
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon::==( o ) 22:50, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
WTCM47 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Okay, I'm going to tell the truth. I have created multiple accounts and abused them. I started editing Wikipeia as an IP address user. I vandalized often. I created an account called Lmnodogsuphomie101. I wanted to make reasonable edits. I got into an argument with A guy saved by Jesus and ended up being blocked. I started the account Mets1237 as a fresh start from my vandalism. Jpgordon recognized me and I was blocked. I created Mets12372 as another fresh start even though I did no vandalism with the account Mets1237. I got angry and started posting disturbing messages on my talk page. After a few weeks I realized this was getting me knowwhere. I created this account to do good edits. I made 180 edits including this one. I thought no one would no my past. I was wrong. I lied on my unblock request. To Sumerize this up I started editing Wikipedia for vandalism and later realized I should not vandalize. So I stared making constructive edits. I perfectly understand why you should block me. Wikipedia is a wonderful place and I would like to continue editing on Wikipedia. Please just give me one more chance. If I do anything that you do not like, you can block me forever and I will not be able to say anything. I know I don't deserve to be unblocked but I would like you to consider that I am really sorry. If I do not get unblocked then I hope that I made Wikipedia a better place. I hope I made a difference in Wikipedia. I just want to leave a legacy. If not then I guess I am done with Wikipedia. If I do not get unblocked from Wikipedia then I would respect your decision and not do anymore unblock requests. Goodbye, WTCM47 editor on Wikipedia from June 2015- February 2016. I enjoyed my time while I edited Wikipedia and I hope that you will consider unblocking me and I promise I will make constructive edits.
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- You don't get to remove declined requests on active blocks. Do it again and your talk page access will be revoked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 06:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
edit
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WTCM47, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 01:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
WTCM47 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Unfortunately there is now way I can prove I will notvandalize again. I SWEAR on my life I will never vandalize Wikipedia again. I realize what I did wrong. I was a sock puppet. The last sock I didn't do honestly but I did sock before. What I did was wrong. Vandalizing is wrong. I will never vandalize again. Take my word for it. I am completely sorry for my actions. If you do no believe me you can keep an eye on me and if I do one think you do not like you can block me. I beg you to give one more chance editing Wikipedia. If you think of a way for me to prove I will not vandalize again I will do. If I do any sort of vandalism again you can block my IP address forever including account creation again. I learned from my mistakes. Socking only makes it worse when I vandalize on another account before. If you decline my unblock request can you suggest ways to maybe improve my request or what to talk about in my unblock request. Please believe me. If I get unblocked I will mostly edit sports articles and current tv shows and movies. I hope you will consider unblocking me.
Decline reason:
Given that you were socking after your last beautifully worded unblock request, I see no reason to beleive in your sincerity to work within Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Huon (talk) 23:38, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Talkpage access revoked due to abuse. Acroterion (talk) 23:17, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Minesweeper
editHi WTCM47,
I am a professor researching a historic figure. I noticed that you reached out to Minesweeper in the past. I need to talk to Minesweeper about an article they created in 2004. Can you help to put us in touch? I already left a UserTalk message at Minesweeper's page. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by A&ApProf (talk • contribs) 14:23, 18 September 2018 (UTC)