April 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page David Farrer has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 14:06, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page David Farrer. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 14:10, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on David Farrer. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 14:11, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

David Farrer

edit

Please acknowledge the edit summaries provided by various editor who have reverted your contributions to this article. The discussion should be carried out on the talk page not escalate into an edit war. Favonian (talk) 14:13, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Can you please stop edit warring on the page David Farrer? If you think the information you have should be included in the page, I would suggest that you start a discussion at Talk: David Farrer if you haven't already done so. Please note that if you carry on edit warring you may be blocked from editing without notice --5 albert square (talk) 14:17, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the final warning that you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to David Farrer. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 14:25, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Talk: David Farrer

edit

There is a discussion at Talk: David Farrer that you may be interested in --5 albert square (talk) 14:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistently edit-warring at David Farrer including violation of the 3-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite 16:57, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

July 2011

edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Keith Newton (prelate). Thank you. — AJDS talk 16:05, 9 July 2011 (UTC)Reply