Waov12

=

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Academic dress (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to McGill, Commencement and Scarlet

Academic dress of McGill University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to McGill

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited McGill University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scarlet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Travel + Leisure rankings in lead of McGill University

I've opened a discussion of the Travel + Leisure ranking in the lead of McGill University. Please weigh in. Thanks! ElKevbo (talk) 01:59, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

It's unacceptable to continually edit war with other editors without even trying to discuss your differences with them. The discussion has been open for over a week and you haven't bothered to say anything. So if you have an objection to my edits, make your case. ElKevbo (talk) 00:41, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

McGill's Rankings

See the talk page please. Biomedicinal

Consensus can't be achieved as you say nothing on the talk page where I did express my opinion; the guidelines stipulate the prohibition of giving undue weight to rankings in the lead. Biomedicinal

I saw you wrote in the edit summary:"If consensus cannot be achieved, then do not change or edit for your own personal gratification". If you check the history of that page, such lengthy ranking information had been left in the lead for a long period since I typed my opinion, which is the last response to this issue, on the talk page. So, I changed it since no further objection was seen, implying consensus. Instead, it is you who refuse to discuss in details and revert other's edit for your "personal gratification". By the way, this isn't my personal preference, but the rules in the guidelines. Biomedicinal