User talk:Warwickabrown

Welcome!

Hi Warwickabrown! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:04, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ryan Rhoten (January 26)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Fancy Refrigerator was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 15:07, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Warwickabrown! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 15:07, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Warwickabrown. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Ryan Rhoten, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:04, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Ryan Rhoten has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ryan Rhoten. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:22, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ryan Rhoten

Hello, Warwickabrown. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ryan Rhoten, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Ryan Rhoten

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Ryan Rhoten has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:10, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:10, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

August 2026

Hello, I'm Gurkubondinn. An edit that you recently made to A Streetcar Named Desire (1984 film) seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. ‑‑gurkubondinn 13:44, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

excuse me but I wrote and researched all my edits including every source. You are mistaken. Please verify via the sources than simply inventing a claim. The only thing I used AI for is the plot. I spent a lot of time putting this together and improving the credibility of the article. I'll be restoring my edits Warwickabrown (talk) 14:27, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

You are not allowed to use an AI for anything, there are no exceptions in WP:NOLLM for writing plot summaries. ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:31, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

fair enough. Revert that section. I added awards music soundtrack and production all sourced from original and reliable sources like Washington Post. The rest of my edits are well researches, written and sourced Warwickabrown (talk) 14:34, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Are you saying that Diff/1367739926 was done without any LLM assistance? ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:37, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

the only thing I used it for was the plot. I quoted my sources including interviews with Ann Margret and Marvin Hamlish, tv reviews at the time, golden globes and emmys pages and a article about tenesee Williams and Hollywood censorship. Every source cited. Is it so hard to believe? I've vastly improved this article which was a stub with much richer content all cited!! Warwickabrown (talk) 14:41, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Yes, I have a hard time believing that Diff/1367739926 is not AI-generated. You should read the WP:USED-AI? essay, but we can take this to the WP:AIN noticeboard if you want to get more opinions. ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:42, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

I understand your concern, but I want to clarify my process. I conducted all the research myself using sources such as Film Score Monthly and Discogs, and every factual claim is cited. The research, sourcing and editorial decisions were entirely my own.

I would ask that you point to specific elements of the edit that concern you rather than a general impression, as 'I find it hard to believe a human wrote this' is not a concrete objection. I don't want to have to do a wholesale rewrite of something I already poured a lot of time into. I took time to make it as factual and neutral as possible because I've had issues with rejections in the past where things were considered opinion or unverified. I'm happy to happy to discuss any specific concerns you have about accuracy, neutrality or sourcing, (outside of the plot which I already said I used AI for) and I welcome a review at WP:AIN if you feel that is necessary. Warwickabrown (talk) 14:58, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

That doesn't address the question. Did you use AI to help you with this response? ‑‑gurkubondinn 15:01, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Please refer me to WP:AIN for more opinions. With feedback I can rewrite the article. I've said many times that AI was used for the plot only. I'm happy to rewrite sections that the consensus agree need revision but I'm not attempting a wholesale rewrite on your opinion alone. Warwickabrown (talk) 15:05, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

 Sure thing; WP:AIN § User:Warwickabrown

But can you answer my question, did you use AI to reply to me? ‑‑gurkubondinn 15:23, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Streetcar named desire 1984.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Streetcar named desire 1984.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 8 August 2026 (UTC)