Watchlords

August 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that the username you have chosen, "Watchlords", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of something other than yourself. Please note that you may not edit on behalf of a company, group, institution, product, or website which relates to the entity in question, and Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are promotional or accounts that are shared. If you are willing to use a personal account, please take a moment to create a new account or request a username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our Conflict of interest guideline and Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 12:19, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Watchlords

A tag has been placed on User:Watchlords, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is an "attack page", and appears to be primarily intended to disparage or threaten its subject. This includes biographies of living people that are unsourced and entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks; attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I am One of Many (talk) 21:44, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Watchlords (talk) 22:12, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

It addresses facts, not fictions. I expected this type of reaction by supporters of Invicta and as such have posted the page on line. Everything posted is supported by facts, documents and photos. If Wikipedia deletes this content it will reinforce what many already think, that corporations and their allies can bully regular users.

I run a watch forum and claim made is supported by verifiable facts. If I say Michael davis is a felon, the records are there. If i say he claimed to be a SEAL, the records are there. If he claims to have graduated from a college, the records are there. If Invicta sold fake sandstone dials, the records are there.

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Watchlords (talk) 22:42, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

This page may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion for the following reasons: as a page that serves no purpose but to disparage or threaten its subject or some other entity. This includes libel, legal threats, material intended purely to harass or intimidate a person or an article about a living person that is entirely negative in tone and unsourced, where there is no neutral version in the history to revert to. See CSD G10.

because in its current form it serves only to promote an entity, person or product, and would require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic. However, the mere fact that a company, organization, or product is an article's subject does not, on its own, qualify that article for deletion under this criterion. Nor does this criterion apply where substantial encyclopedic content would remain after removing the promotional material; in this case please remove the promotional material yourself, or add the

tag to alert others to do so. See CSD G11.