Watson system

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Watson system, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 02:24, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Yukio Mishima and Kosaburo Eto

Hi Watson system. The problem I see with the claim that Mishima committed suicide under the influence of Eto's actions is that, as User:MarnetteD says, it appears to be your own original research, not the opinion of academics or other analysts. Mishima's own writings in this instance are a primary source. Therefore, using Spiritual lectures for the young Samurai in order to claim that Mishima killed himself under the influence of Eto's actions constitutes your own interpretation of Mishima's writings. Policy on using primary sources states: "Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation". You need to find a secondary source, for example, a published history, or a respected biography of Mishima, that states that Mishima's suicide was substantially inspired by Eto. After all, there is a long tradition of ritual suicide in Japan - we can't just presume, without historians and biographers telling us, that Eto's example was key. I hope this helps. VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 02:46, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Neutrinos

Hello,

I noticed that you added a section to the Neutrino article regarding the claimed detection of faster-than-light travel. In it, you linked a source, Sankei Shinbun 9 September 2011. I attempted to look up the source to verify it, but was unsuccessful (my lack of knowledge of Japanese no doubt contributed to this.) I was just wondering if you had a link to the article in question (a Japanese version would still work, as I could run it through Google Translate). I'm curious as to if you meant to cite Sankei Shimbun, the newspaper, instead; I'm also interested in why they ran such an article several weeks before the report. Thanks for your help with Wikipedia! Seleucus (talk) 04:01, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi Seleucus.
The Sankei Shimbun is a reputable paper and is considered as one of the five "national" newspapers in Japan. The commentator is Dr. Yoichro Suzuki (鈴木洋一郎). He is a Professor of the University of Tokyo and was co-researchers in Super-Kamiokande with Prof. Masatoshi Koshiba. As you know the University of Tokyo is the highest educational institutin in Japan and has produced many Nobel Prize winners till now. I wonder what the problem is? The article is [ニュートリノ実験　専門家驚き」(the Neutrino experiment---scientists surprised at it)．(But it is written Japanese) Make sure it again.--Watson system (talk) 07:02, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I just wanted to add a link to the article so other people could see it. No problem Seleucus (talk) 13:30, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. I'm glad you see my opinion.--Watson system (talk) 13:51, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Constructions of the University of Tokyo

Please do not add machine translations of other language Wikipedia articles to the the English Wikipedia, as you did with the above, unless you are able to convert them properly into English. Much of the article you have created is virtually unintelligble.--Jac16888 ^Talk 14:29, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

It is not machine translation, and is translated exactly original Japanese text into English, so it seems lumbering. I can see how you'd misunderstand of my translation. This style was could not been translated by machine, if have question my assertion, please try it in Web translation service. I want rewrite it in national style by bilingual person.--Watson system (talk) 15:39, 31 October 2011 (UTC) oo

And now, your English is machine translation, isn't it? ....Cherry-bye.--Dr. Watson system (talk) 02:12, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Smoking ban

I do not understand what you are trying to do.

Why do you keep taking out of the article two other pictures? There is no problem with these two pictures. They have been in the article for some time. Please stop adding back into the image (even hidden) this image. We are agreed that this image is not suitable. Discussion will not change the problems with it. Having it it hidden in the article is pointless. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 16:32, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

I made reply note of smoking ban.--Watson system (talk) 16:58, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chishō Takaoka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Load (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Watson system. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)