Weavil-blues

October 2016

Hello, I'm Cahk. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Helge Solum Larsen without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cahk (talk) 08:10, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Hello, I'm NOTNOTABLE. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Helge Solum Larsen without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not remove material that is properly cited. Instead, if you must, bring it up on the talk page. NOTNOTABLE (talk) 20:33, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:21, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

• It may also be of concern that you've invoked the approval of a lawyer in two of your edit summaries. Please read Wikipedia's policies re: WP:LEGAL. If you have a conflict of interest WP:COI, you may discuss the issues at the article talk page. Thank you, 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:21, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

It is not relevant for Wikipedia purposes whether the edits have been reviewed by the subject's family and/or lawyer. What is relevant is that the edits are backed up by published reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 21:34, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:27, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Weavil-blues. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Helge Solum Larsen, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2016 (UTC)