User talk:Weissmann~enwiki/Archive 1

Archive 1

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Werner Traud has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Redfarmer (talk) 11:28, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I hit the wrong button on my client. I've undid my changes. Redfarmer (talk) 11:30, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. •xytram•talkpics 08:38, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Please reade Wikipedia:Your first article. You cannot create a page just to justify something you have put in another article. All articles must reach Stub class to be kept, including WP:notability and References. Triwbe (talk) 11:59, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

This is stupid. Take a look here: Ralf Linke. --Weissmann (talk) 13:28, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Weissmann - you need to put comments in the discussion pages of each article. It's unlikely people will read responses here. •xytram•talkpics 13:54, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

• Ralf Linke - thank you I missed this one. This person may be notable, that is why it is still there (for now), but you have made no attempt at all to put any link or any reference to show that he may pass Wikipedia:Notability (people). I.e. the attributions that I have been writing to you about for days now. Editing Wikipedia is more than just copying information from old festival programmes. --Triwbe (talk) 14:19, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Difference between Ralf Linke and Christoph Traud? I don't understand. Please help. Thank you. Best --Weissmann (talk) 14:26, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

• Ralf Linke is a member of Erfolgsduo Hagen and they have at least produced 2 CDs. Now that does not make him immediately notable, nor is Erfolgsduo Hagen shown to be notable, but my experience of deletion is that (regardless of WP:BAND) if a band has a couple of published CDs and the article is not too promotional, the article will be kept. So what I have done is given you a chance to improve Erfolgsduo Hagen by adding at least one more reference from a reliable source before going for WP:AFD. I think, in this case, Ralf Linke should probably be merged as a section of Erfolgsduo Hagen. --Triwbe (talk) 15:42, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to sign your posts and comments with four tildes (~~~~), which will let others know who left it. --Bhadani 05:57, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi Badhani, thanks for your warm welcome. I like to be a Wikipedian in Germany and I hope I will be a good one for the english WP too. --Weissmann 10:04, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Joe Zawinul, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.Paul210 12:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ego Systems, Inc.

A tag has been placed on Ego Systems, Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

Little context in Siemens ST55

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Siemens ST55, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Siemens ST55 is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Siemens ST55, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:31, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Opera etc

Music Drama is a specific genre of Opera, in particular it's usually applied to the operas of Richard Wagner. Category:Music dramas is really for specific musical works that are considered to be part of that genre, so the general article about opera shouldn't be part of that category. David Underdown (talk) 11:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Dear David, let me thank you for your comment. Best --Weissmann (talk) 09:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Der Goggolori

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Der Goggolori, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

--Finngall talk 22:09, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Restoration of absolute nonsense

Hi. Any thoughts on why you think the below nonsense has ANY place in the Folk music of Ireland article?:

• "one of the first irish folkloric musicians in a little town that no ones heard of, but its there, believe me" (What rubbish.)
• "Another unknown yet incredibly gifted folkloric musician, living in the early 1800's ... played a variety of instruments including the flute, banjo, the saxaphone and the electric guitar" (Electric guitar in the 1880s? Absolute nonsense!)
• "have been put on display in the "Museam of the Great Irish Muscians" located in the northwestern part of Antarctica." (What complete and absolute BS.)
• "Uilleann ... [is pronounced] ... u-lay-an-pa-sa-twa-le-moch-uste-fol-twe". (Absolute twaddle!)
• ETC

You (re)inserted this nonsense vandalism with this edit. I can only assume that you included this stuff by accident. If not, an explanation would be appreciated. Guliolopez (talk) 01:52, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Dear Guliolopez, you*re right. It was a little accident. Sorry for this. All the best --Weissmann (talk) 05:15, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Bescay

A tag has been placed on Bescay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

 -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 09:00, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Riccardo Greco

A tag has been placed on Riccardo Greco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

 Blowdart | talk 07:37, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Dirk Büchsenschütz, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:01, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

OK, thanks. Best --Weissmann (talk) 12:05, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Josef Jost jun."

A page you created, Josef Jost jun., has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:

Patent nonsense and gibberish, an unsalvageably incoherent page with no meaningful content.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you Loren.wilton (talk) 12:04, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Erfolgsduo Hagen

A tag has been placed on Erfolgsduo Hagen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

 Guest9999 (talk) 16:31, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

I've removed the speedy delete tag from the article but you should really get some reliably sourced information on what the act have done and why they are important into the article or it could still be deleted in this way. Good luck and happy editing, Guest9999 (talk) 16:41, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Flagging Festspiele Balver Höhle for further review

Hello, Weissmann~enwiki … I recently encountered the article about Festspiele Balver Höhle and in my opinion, it either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for Organizations and companies, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it violates a copyright.

I am considering tagging Festspiele Balver Höhle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for deletion according to the Deletion policy … I do not have time to examine the article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

I have created this initial entry on your Talk page because you are either the original author of the article, or else a recent contributor to it; I will leave more detailed information regarding my specific concerns about the article on its Discussion page … please respond either there or on this Talk page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

Be sure to read Ownership of articles, and remember that other editors may not share your opinion about the notability of the article's subject.

Also I understand that it may be more difficult to find references for foreign topics but personally I do not see a problem if the references are in German 3.

Removal of speedy deletion tag

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

1. Place {{hangon}} on the page directly below the deletion tag. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
2. Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. ... DO NOT remove the {{Db}} tag yourself! I have restored it ... please read Wikipedia:Three-revert rule and don't do it again, or you may get blocked from editing here. — •xytram•talkpics 13:54, 13 June 2008 (UTC) --> —Triwbe (talk) 10:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Dear Triwbe, I am busy. We have to work on the article. Need help! Best --Weissmann (talk) 12:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Weissmann FBH 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Weissmann FBH 1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

J Milburn (talk) 11:56, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Dear J Milburn, this image is taken from a paper printed in 1985 for the Festspiele Balver Höhle and its audience. I gues it is a kind of "Public Domain" (Wikipedia:Public domain), so we shouldn't have a copyright problem here. Best --Weissmann (talk) 12:02, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Weissmann FBH 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Weissmann FBH 2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

J Milburn (talk) 12:15, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Some further informations: Printed by Busch & Cordes, Balve, written by Agatha Allhoff-Cramer, design by Werbestudio Ahrens. Best --Weissmann (talk) 12:17, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Gabriele Krieger

A tag has been placed on Gabriele Krieger requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

 Phlegm Rooster (talk) 11:12, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Josef Jost

A tag has been placed on Josef Jost requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

 Triwbe (talk) 11:18, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Weissmann Hagen 3.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Weissmann Hagen 3.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 12:58, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Weissmann FBH 1994 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Weissmann FBH 1994 1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

J Milburn (talk) 13:41, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Best --Weissmann (talk) 13:44, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Weissmann_FBH_1998_2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Weissmann_FBH_1998_2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

OsamaK 11:43, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Dear Osama, this one is a promotional image taken by the Festspiele Balver Höhle. Best --Weissmann (talk) 11:26, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Von Landsberg-Velen

A tag has been placed on Von Landsberg-Velen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

 Ged UK (talk) 09:53, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Weissmann FBH 2007 1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Weissmann FBH 2007 1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

BJBot (talk) 05:19, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Weissmann FBH 1994 CD.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Weissmann FBH 1994 CD.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

BJBot (talk) 05:19, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Weissmann FBH 1994 1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Weissmann FBH 1994 1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

BJBot (talk) 05:19, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Weissmann FBH 1995 1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Weissmann FBH 1995 1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

BJBot (talk) 05:19, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Weissmann FBH 1995 CD.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Weissmann FBH 1995 CD.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

BJBot (talk) 05:19, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Weissmann FBH 1998 1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Weissmann FBH 1998 1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

BJBot (talk) 05:19, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Weissmann FBH 1998 3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Weissmann FBH 1998 3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

BJBot (talk) 05:19, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Weissmann FBH 2005 1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Weissmann FBH 2005 1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Weissmann FBH 1996 CD.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Weissmann FBH 1996 CD.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

BJBot (talk) 05:20, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of La piccola banda

I have nominated La piccola banda, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La piccola banda. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ged UK (talk) 10:07, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Christoph Traud

A tag has been placed on Christoph Traud requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

 Triwbe (talk) 06:54, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Subway (band)

A tag has been placed on Subway (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

 Triwbe (talk) 06:55, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tu es Petrus

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tu es Petrus, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Triwbe (talk) 06:56, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Flagging Erfolgsduo Hagen for further review

Hello, Weissmann~enwiki … I recently encountered the article about Erfolgsduo Hagen and in my opinion, it either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for Music, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it violates a copyright.

I am considering tagging Erfolgsduo Hagen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for deletion according to the Deletion policy … I do not have time to examine the article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

I have created this initial entry on your Talk page because you are either the original author of the article, or else a recent contributor to it; I will leave more detailed information regarding my specific concerns about the article on its Discussion page … please respond either there or on this Talk page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

Be sure to read Ownership of articles, and remember that other editors may not share your opinion about the notability of the article's subject.

I do not mean to imply that your contribution is unappreciated … perhaps you should read Your first article … and remember, there was a time when I knew less about how Wikipedia works than you know right now, and I am always available to help you become a more proactive contributor.

Removal of speedy deletion tag

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

1. Place {{hangon}} on the page directly below the deletion tag. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
2. Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. ... DO NOT remove the {{Db}} tag yourself! I have restored it ... please read Wikipedia:Three-revert rule and don't do it again, or you may get blocked from editing here. --> —Triwbe (talk) 07:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Peter Pan (2008 musical)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Peter Pan (2008 musical), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Triwbe (talk) 07:10, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Sahra Drone

A tag has been placed on Sahra Drone requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

 Triwbe (talk) 07:10, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Der Ruf ist ruiniert

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Der Ruf ist ruiniert, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Triwbe (talk) 07:11, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Wir sind die Sieger

A tag has been placed on Wir sind die Sieger, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

 Triwbe (talk) 07:11, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Phantastische Reise zu Kapitaen Nemo

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Phantastische Reise zu Kapitaen Nemo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Triwbe (talk) 07:12, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jürgen Klostermeyer

A tag has been placed on Jürgen Klostermeyer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

 •xytram•talkpics 08:36, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Helmut Winschermann

A tag has been placed on Helmut Winschermann requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

 Triwbe (talk) 11:46, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Frank Hoffmann

A tag has been placed on Frank Hoffmann requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

 Triwbe (talk) 11:48, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robin Hood - Ein Abenteuer mit Musik

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Robin Hood - Ein Abenteuer mit Musik, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Triwbe (talk) 11:49, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Angelika Nützsche

A tag has been placed on Angelika Nützsche requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

 Triwbe (talk) 11:50, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ayleen Schneider

A tag has been placed on Ayleen Schneider requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

 Triwbe (talk) 11:50, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Der Zauberer von OZ

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Der Zauberer von OZ, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Triwbe (talk) 11:51, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Wolfgang Schwericke

A tag has been placed on Wolfgang Schwericke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

 Triwbe (talk) 11:51, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Box 58

A tag has been placed on Box 58 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

Triwbe (talk) 11:52, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Image

Hi there, can you please help what may be the copyright status for this image for the article Anti-tobacco movement in Nazi Germany? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 16:07, 13 June 2008 (UTC)