WendyP123

Wikipedia does not permit incivility or personal attacks against other editors

You are entitled to disagree with anything I say, of course, but you are not entitled to making personal attacks such as this:

Well Mr Cantor the reason you aren't referred to a as an "activist " is because your career is your activism . Your kind can come up with ridiculous theories and impose them on minorities validated only by data manipulation or exclusion . Whats fascinating is that you have any career at all as you spend ample time here trying to keep some minor cornerstone of your useless work validated . Your attack Jokestress because she represents the community you need to smear and discredit so you don't lose your job. Like Dr Money it's not the truth that matters but your 'theories".[1]

Please read the relevant rules (WP:NPA, WP:civility, WP:etiquette), and follow them by altering your comment at The Man Who Would Be Queen talk page to express your ideas in a manner acceptable to WP. WP is not a battleground. If there is any specific edit or behaviour of mine you believe violates any WP rule, please address it in the appropriate forum. Using WP to express your hostility against me (or against scientists in general) will not result in an improved WP.
— James Cantor (talk) 14:03, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

I'd like to second that recommendation. Your comments are rude and constitute a personal attack. It's not always obvious to new editors, but Wikipedia is not a chat room, and the discussion pages are for improving the articles. If you've got something to tell Cantor personally, then you can send him an e-mail message. Your comments on Wikipedia should be about improving the article so that Wikipedia says what the high-quality reliable sources say about a subject.

If you need help or have questions, consider contacting editor assistance. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:11, 22 March 2009 (UTC)